Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy entirely different segments of the graphics hardware spectrum, and the recorded data confirms that their strengths are mutually exclusive. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) designed for portability and low-power operation within a laptop or compact system. Its entire feature set revolves around efficiency and basic display output, with a 15 W thermal design power and a Ring Bus interface that ties it directly into the host processor's architecture.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, by contrast, is a discrete, dual-slot add-in card built for raw compute throughput. It carries a 225 W thermal design power, requires a 550 W suggested power supply, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The data shows that the LX MAX wins decisively in every performance-oriented category, but the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile wins in the categories that matter for its intended use case: power consumption, physical footprint, and integration simplicity.

For workloads that rely on massive parallel throughput, the LX MAX is the only viable option between the two. Its shading unit count of 6144 dwarfs the Intel part's 256 shading units, and its 192 texture mapping units compare against the Intel's 16. The LX MAX also fields 96 render output units versus the Intel's 8. Those structural advantages translate directly into the compute and fill rate figures recorded in the database, which show the LX MAX at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, while the Intel part sits at 819.2 GFLOPS and 12.80 GPixel/s respectively.

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile wins in scenarios where power delivery and thermal dissipation are constrained. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the LX MAX's 225 W requirement, and its IGP slot width means it occupies no expansion slot at all. The LX MAX, at 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, demands a full dual-slot chassis position and a 16-pin power connector. For a portable device, the Intel part is the only choice, as its display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the host system defines connectivity rather than the GPU itself.

Benchmark results indicate that the LX MAX is built for high-resolution rendering, compute acceleration, and memory-intensive tasks. Its 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Intel part uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The LX MAX's memory clock is recorded at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective throughput. These figures confirm that the Lisuan card handles large datasets and texture-heavy scenes without bottlenecking on memory access.

Architecture Differences

The two products diverge fundamentally at the architecture level. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is based on Raptor Lake silicon using Intel's Generation 12.2 architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with a "TrueGPU" architecture from the 7G100 generation, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference alone gives the LX MAX a density advantage, though the Intel part's integrated nature means it shares the host die rather than being a standalone chip.

The Intel part's architecture is Generation 12.2, which supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The DirectX feature level difference is notable: the LX MAX meets the 12_2 specification, which includes features like variable rate shading and mesh shaders, while the Intel part stops at 12_1. The Vulkan version is reversed, with Intel supporting 1.4 and the LX MAX at 1.3.

Clock behavior also differs sharply. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz. The LX MAX records no base or boost clock in the database, instead listing only its memory clock at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part's memory is entirely system shared, with no dedicated VRAM, while the LX MAX carries 12 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit interface.

The compute pipeline structures are vastly different. Intel's implementation uses 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The LX MAX uses 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Neither part has ray tracing cores or tensor cores recorded in the database, so the performance gap is purely a function of raw shader and texture throughput.

The Intel part's FP16 performance is recorded as 1.638 TFLOPS (2:1), while the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). The FP32 figures are 819.2 GFLOPS and 24.58 TFLOPS respectively. The LX MAX's texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s compares to Intel's 25.60 GTexel/s, and the pixel rates are 192.0 GPixel/s versus 12.80 GPixel/s.

Physical configuration reinforces the architectural split. The Intel part is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface and no power connectors. The LX MAX is a dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and a single 16-pin power connector. Its display outputs are four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, whereas the Intel part relies entirely on the host portable device for display connectivity.

The Intel part's production status is Active, with a release date of January 3, 2023, and its successor is listed as Arc Graphics-M. The LX MAX is also Active, with a release date of March 16, 2026. The Intel part has no recorded predecessor, and the LX MAX has no successor. The Intel part's generation is listed as "HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake)," while the LX MAX's generation is "7G100."

The Verdict

The data supports a clear bifurcation based on system type and workload. For any portable, thermally constrained, or power-limited system, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is the only logical choice. Its 15 W TDP and IGP form factor mean it requires no additional power delivery, no cooling solution beyond the host's existing thermal design, and no expansion slot. It is integrated into the Raptor Lake platform and uses system shared memory, which keeps the overall system footprint minimal. The recorded release date of January 2023 and Active production status indicate it remains a current product.

For any workload that demands substantial graphics throughput, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is the selection that the recorded numbers support. Its 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate place it in a completely different performance class. The LX MAX requires a 550 W suggested power supply, a dual-slot chassis position, and a 16-pin power connector, all of which are acceptable trade-offs for a desktop system built around high-end rendering or compute tasks. Its March 2026 release date makes it a newer product, and its Active status confirms ongoing availability.

The percentile versus all GPUs is recorded as 50 for both parts, which indicates they sit at the median of the database's tracked GPUs, but that figure is a relative ranking that does not capture the enormous absolute performance gap between the two. The average benchmark score is zero for both, and no nearest rivals are listed, so the comparison here is strictly between the two items in the database.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is the clear choice for gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering, GPU compute, or any task where frame time or render time matters. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is the clear choice for basic display output, office productivity, media playback, and light acceleration in a portable form factor. There is no overlap in their intended use cases, and the hardware specifications confirm that neither part can substitute for the other.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile delivers 819.2 GFLOPS FP32. The LX MAX is approximately 30 times higher in raw FP32 throughput.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM.

Q: Do these GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The LX MAX meets the higher feature level specification.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has a 15 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, requires one 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX?

A: The LX MAX is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no benchmark scores for either GPU, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. The wins count is zero for both parts. However, the specification-level comparisons in the database provide a comprehensive picture of the performance gap.

The largest advantage for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX appears in FP32 compute. The LX MAX records 24.58 TFLOPS against the Intel part's 819.2 GFLOPS. That is a 30-fold difference in raw shader throughput. The FP16 figures follow the same pattern: 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX MAX versus 1.638 TFLOPS for the Intel part. Both parts use a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, so the relative gap is consistent.

Texture throughput shows a similar disparity. The LX MAX delivers 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile delivers 25.60 GTexel/s. The pixel rate comparison is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 12.80 GPixel/s, a 15-fold difference. These fill rate numbers directly impact resolution scaling and texture-heavy scenes.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive factor. The LX MAX's 432.0 GB/s comes from 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Intel part's bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning it shares the host system's memory bus. The LX MAX also has a dedicated memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel part has no dedicated memory clock.

The shading unit count difference is the structural root of the performance gap. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The LX MAX has 24 times more shading units, 12 times more TMUs, and 12 times more ROPs.

The Intel part does hold advantages in specific areas. Its base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 1600 MHz are recorded, while the LX MAX has no base or boost clock values listed. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, which is newer than the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3. The Intel part also uses a less demanding power profile at 15 W, and its Ring Bus interface is simpler than the LX MAX's PCIe 4.0 x16 connection.

The API support comparison shows the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, while the LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The LX MAX's DirectX 12 Ultimate designation indicates support for the full DirectX 12 feature set, which is a meaningful advantage for modern game titles that use mesh shaders or other 12_2 features.

The release timeline also differs. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile was released on January 3, 2023, and its successor is listed as Arc Graphics-M. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX was released on March 16, 2026, with no successor listed. The LX MAX is the newer product by more than three years, which partially explains its access to a 6 nm TSMC process and GDDR6 memory.

The production status for both is Active, meaning neither has been discontinued. The Intel part's foundry is Intel, and the LX MAX's foundry is TSMC. The Intel part's chip is Raptor Lake, while the LX MAX's chip is the 7G106. Neither GPU has a recorded launch MSRP, so the database provides no pricing information for either product.

The transistor count, die size, and transistor density are unrecorded for both parts. The Intel part has no length, height, or width dimensions listed because it is an IGP. The LX MAX has full dimensions recorded at 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. The Intel part's display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," while the LX MAX offers four DisplayPort 1.4a connections.

The overall picture from the database is unambiguous. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX outperforms the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile in every measured compute and memory category by wide margins. The Intel part wins only in power efficiency, integration simplicity, and Vulkan API version. Each part is suited to its respective market segment, and the recorded specifications confirm there is no meaningful overlap in their capabilities.