Intel Arc Pro B65 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Pro B65 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Both entries list empty benchmark arrays, zero average benchmark scores, and zero wins for either side. This absence of measured data means that any comparative performance analysis must rely entirely on the architectural specifications and computed throughput values provided in the database.

The raw compute figures, however, point to a clear division of capabilities. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, exactly double the 12.29 TFLOPS recorded for the Intel Arc Pro B65. In FP16 compute, the LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), again precisely twice the Arc Pro B65's 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1). These numbers indicate that for raw shader throughput, the LX 7G100 holds a 100 percent advantage over the Arc Pro B65 in both precision formats.

The shading unit counts corroborate this gap. The LX 7G100 contains 6144 shading units, 3584 more than the Arc Pro B65's 2560. Texture mapping units follow the same pattern: 192 on the LX 7G100 versus 160 on the Arc Pro B65, a 20 percent difference. Raster operation units stand at 96 for the LX 7G100 and 80 for the Arc Pro B65, a 20 percent delta as well.

Yet the pixel rate and texture rate figures are identical across both cards: 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s respectively. This means that despite the LX 7G100's higher shading unit count and FP32 throughput, the fill-rate ceilings are the same. The database shows that both cards are bound to the same pixel throughput, which suggests that the Arc Pro B65's higher memory clock partially compensates for its narrower bus.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The Arc Pro B65 carries 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), producing 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 432.0 GB/s. The Arc Pro B65 therefore offers 176.0 GB/s more bandwidth, a 40.7 percent advantage, alongside 20 GB more capacity.

The pixel rate equality at 192.0 GPixel/s is notable because the LX 7G100 has 16 more ROPs. The database does not include a per-clock breakdown, but the Arc Pro B65's boost clock of 2400 MHz matches the only clock figure listed for the LX 7G100, which is the memory clock. No base or boost clock is recorded for the LX 7G100's core, so the fill-rate parity cannot be fully attributed to clock speeds.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in raw compute workloads. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is double the Arc Pro B65's 12.29 TFLOPS. Applications that scale with shading unit count, such as general-purpose GPU compute, physics simulations, or shader-heavy rendering passes, would see a direct benefit from the LX 7G100's 6144 shading units versus 2560 on the Arc Pro B65. The FP16 advantage, 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, also positions the LX 7G100 ahead for workloads that can use reduced-precision arithmetic.

The Intel Arc Pro B65 wins in memory capacity and bandwidth. With 32 GB of GDDR6 and 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth, it provides more than double the capacity of the LX 7G100's 12 GB and a 40.7 percent bandwidth advantage. Large datasets, high-resolution texture pools, or workloads that require holding substantial working sets in VRAM would favor the Arc Pro B65. The 256-bit bus width also gives it a wider memory path, which can be advantageous for access patterns that are not perfectly coalesced.

In terms of interface generation, the Arc Pro B65 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This gives the Arc Pro B65 a newer bus standard, though the database does not record transfer rates for either interface. For display output, the Arc Pro B65 provides four DisplayPort 2.1 connections, whereas the LX 7G100 provides four DisplayPort 1.4a connections. The newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard on the Arc Pro B65 supports higher bandwidth per connection, which matters for multi-monitor high-resolution setups.

The LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3, while the Arc Pro B65 supports Vulkan 1.4. Both cards list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc Pro B65's Vulkan 1.4 is a newer API revision, which may offer additional features for compatible applications.

The Arc Pro B65 also includes 20 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100's database entry lists no ray tracing core count. The Arc Pro B65's architecture, Xe2-HPG, includes dedicated RT hardware, whereas the LX 7G100's TrueGPU architecture does not record any such units. This suggests that ray-traced workloads would rely on the Arc Pro B65's RT cores, while the LX 7G100 would handle ray tracing through its general-purpose shading units if at all.

Power draw differs as well: the LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, while the Arc Pro B65 has a TDP of 200 W. Both cards are dual-slot and use a single 8-pin power connector, and both suggest a 550 W power supply.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 records 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, exactly double the 12.29 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc Pro B65.

Q: How do the memory capacities compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6. The Arc Pro B65 also leads in bandwidth at 608.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Do the two cards have the same pixel fill rate?

A: Yes, both record a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, despite the LX 7G100 having 96 ROPs versus 80 on the Arc Pro B65.

Q: Which card supports a newer PCIe interface?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Does either card include dedicated ray tracing hardware?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 lists 20 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 does not record any ray tracing core count in the database.

Q: What are the display output differences?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 provides four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in every major specification category recorded in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B65 uses the BMG-G21 chip with the Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Clock speeds differ only in the memory domain: the Arc Pro B65 has a base and boost clock of 2400 MHz and memory at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the LX 7G100 has no core clocks recorded and memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ: 32 GB GDDR6 on 256-bit at 608.0 GB/s versus 12 GB GDDR6 on 192-bit at 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units, TMUs, and ROPs all differ: 2560, 160, and 80 on the Arc Pro B65 versus 6144, 192, and 96 on the LX 7G100. The Arc Pro B65 has 20 RT cores; the LX 7G100 has none recorded. FP32 and FP16 throughput differ by a factor of two as described above. TDP differs by 25 W, with the LX 7G100 at 225 W and the Arc Pro B65 at 200 W. Both are dual-slot with one 8-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Bus interface differs: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: DisplayPort 2.1 versus DisplayPort 1.4a, both with four ports. API support differs in Vulkan version: 1.4 on the Arc Pro B65 versus 1.3 on the LX 7G100. Dimensions are recorded only for the LX 7G100: 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. Release dates differ: the Arc Pro B65 is dated 2026-03-31, and the LX 7G100 is dated 2026-06-17. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B65 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage generation for the Pro Series. The chip is designated BMG-G21 and uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The database records 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The architecture includes 20 ray tracing cores, which provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced rendering workloads. The Xe2-HPG architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory subsystem uses a 256-bit GDDR6 interface with 32 GB capacity, and the card connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is built on the TrueGPU architecture, with the chip designated 7G106 and a generation name of 7G100. It uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the database records no transistor count, die size, or transistor density. The architecture does not list any ray tracing cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The memory subsystem uses a 192-bit GDDR6 interface with 12 GB capacity, and the card connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

The process node difference, 5 nm versus 6 nm, is the only recorded manufacturing distinction, with both cards fabricated at TSMC. The Arc Pro B65's smaller node and higher transistor count suggest a denser implementation, while the LX 7G100's larger shading unit count indicates a different design philosophy that favors raw ALU throughput over memory capacity or interface generation. The Arc Pro B65's dedicated RT cores and newer Vulkan and PCIe support point toward a feature-complete professional rendering card, whereas the LX 7G100's specification sheet emphasizes compute density and shader throughput over auxiliary features. The absence of core clock data for the LX 7G100 prevents a direct frequency comparison, but the recorded FP32 and FP16 figures already establish its compute advantage.