Intel Arc Pro B65 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data offers a single direct comparison point, and it is not a close contest. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER records a score of 6269.5. The Intel Arc Pro B65, however, has no benchmark entries in the database, meaning its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. This absence of data prevents a direct numeric delta between the two cards. The only score available belongs to the NVIDIA part, and it is a strong one: 6269.5 points in a modern DirectX 12 workload.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's score places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. This percentile is not a top-tier ranking, but it indicates the card sits ahead of a majority of recorded devices. The nearest rivals in the database clarify the picture further. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 posts an average score of 6270, a delta of 0 percent against the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8 percent behind at 6223, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 trails by 0.2 percent at 6282. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9 percent at 6327. These deltas are all within roughly one percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's performance is tightly clustered with a group of very different GPUs in this specific test. The Intel Arc Pro B65 cannot be placed in this cluster because no score exists for it.

What the data shows is a one-sided head-to-head: the NVIDIA card has a measurable result, and the Intel card has none. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 6269.5 score is essentially tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which suggests generational parity in this workload rather than a leap forward. The Intel part's absence from the benchmark table means any comparison of wins must account for missing information. The database records zero wins for the Intel Arc Pro B65 and zero wins for the NVIDIA card, but the only actual score belongs to NVIDIA.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply at the silicon level. Intel's Arc Pro B65 uses the BMG-G21 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. NVIDIA's RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, within the GeForce 50-series. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but the similarity ends there.

Transistor counts reveal a massive scale difference. The Intel chip contains 19,600 million transistors on a die size of 272 mm², yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The NVIDIA chip packs 45,600 million transistors onto a 378 mm² die, achieving 120.6M per mm². The NVIDIA die is not only larger, it is denser by a factor of roughly 1.67. This explains the substantial gap in raw compute resources.

The shading unit count tells a similar story. Intel provides 2560 shading units, while NVIDIA provides 8960, a 3.5x advantage. Texture mapping units follow the same pattern: 160 for Intel versus 280 for NVIDIA. Raster operation units are closer: 80 for Intel versus 96 for NVIDIA. Ray tracing cores number 20 on the Intel side and 70 on the NVIDIA side. The NVIDIA card also includes 280 tensor cores, while the Intel card's tensor core count is not recorded in the database.

Clock speeds are comparable. The Intel card runs a base clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The NVIDIA card runs a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2452 MHz. The boost advantage is small, roughly 2.2 percent, but the NVIDIA card's compute lead comes from its far larger execution resource pool, not its clocks.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. Intel uses 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus, with memory clocks at 2375 MHz for 19 Gbps effective, producing 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth. NVIDIA uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on the same 256 bit bus, with memory clocks at 1750 MHz for 28 Gbps effective, producing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card delivers 47 percent more bandwidth despite half the capacity. The memory type difference matters: GDDR7 is a newer standard than GDDR6.

Compute throughput follows the resource gap. Intel's FP32 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS, while NVIDIA's is 43.94 TFLOPS, a 3.6x advantage. FP16 performance for Intel is 24.58 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA achieves 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card does not halve its FP32 rate for FP16, which is a significant architectural distinction.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce the NVIDIA lead. Intel delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. NVIDIA delivers 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s. The texture rate advantage is particularly large, at roughly 1.79x.

Power consumption differs substantially. Intel rates its card at 200 W TDP with a single 8-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. NVIDIA rates its card at 350 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector and no suggested PSU recorded. The NVIDIA card uses 75 percent more power, which aligns with its larger silicon and higher throughput.

Both cards are dual-slot designs and use PCIe 5.0 x16 interfaces. Display outputs differ: Intel offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while NVIDIA offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The data points to a clear split in use cases, though the Intel side suffers from a lack of benchmark evidence. Based on the recorded specifications, the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in raw compute, memory bandwidth, ray tracing, and tensor operations. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is roughly 3.6x the Intel part's 12.29 TFLOPS. Its 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is 47 percent higher. Its 70 ray tracing cores dwarf Intel's 20. Its 280 tensor cores have no recorded counterpart on the Intel card.

The Intel Arc Pro B65 wins in memory capacity, offering 32 GB versus 16 GB. This is a decisive advantage for workloads that need large working sets, such as certain AI inference models, large dataset processing, or multi-application virtualization. The Intel card also consumes less power: 200 W versus 350 W. For systems with power constraints or smaller PSUs, the Intel card's 550 W suggested PSU is a lower bar than the NVIDIA card's unrecorded requirement.

The Intel card's lower transistor density, 72.1M per mm² versus NVIDIA's 120.6M per mm², suggests a less complex design that may run cooler or more predictably under sustained load, though the database does not provide thermal data. The NVIDIA card's higher pixel rate, 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, indicates stronger fill-rate-bound performance for high-resolution rendering.

The absence of benchmark data for the Intel card means the database cannot confirm any performance win for it. The only measured result belongs to NVIDIA. The Intel card's advantages are entirely spec-based: capacity, power draw, and display output configuration. The NVIDIA card's advantages are compute-based and, in the one recorded test, validated.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at a delta of 0 percent (6270 average score). It trails the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9 percent and the NVIDIA Quadro K620 by 0.2 percent, while leading the AMD FirePro W600 by 0.8 percent.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. Both use a 256 bit bus.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to the Intel Arc Pro B65's 608.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference?

A: The NVIDIA card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. NVIDIA's FP16 rate is also 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, whereas Intel's is 24.58 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 has a TDP of 200 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and no suggested PSU recorded.

Q: Are there any architectural similarities between the two?

A: Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, both use PCIe 5.0 x16 interfaces, and both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are dual-slot designs.

The Verdict

The data presents a stark choice, but it is a choice constrained by missing information. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has no benchmark scores in the database, so its real-world performance is unmeasured. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one score: 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it at the 36th percentile and within one percentage point of several very different GPUs.

For compute-intensive workloads, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice based on the recorded specifications. Its FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth is 896.0 GB/s versus 608.0 GB/s. Its ray tracing core count is 70 versus 20. Its tensor cores, 280, have no equivalent on the Intel card. For any task that depends on shading, ray tracing, or tensor operations, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's architecture is overwhelmingly better resourced.

For capacity-sensitive workloads, the Intel card offers a distinct advantage: 32 GB of memory versus 16 GB. This is a 2x difference in working set size. It also draws less power, 200 W versus 350 W, which matters for dense or power-limited systems. The Intel card's 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs versus NVIDIA's 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b may suit multi-display setups that favor DisplayPort.

The database cannot recommend the Intel card for performance, because there is no performance data. It can only note the specification-based strengths. The NVIDIA card has a measured result and a clear architecture lead in almost every compute metric. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the stronger GPU by every recorded performance metric, while the Arc Pro B65 offers capacity and power advantages that have no benchmark validation.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every major specification field. The chip differs: BMG-G21 for Intel versus GB203 for NVIDIA. The architecture differs: Xe2-HPG versus Blackwell 2.0. The generation differs: Battlemage (Pro Series) versus GeForce 50.

Transistor count differs substantially: 19,600 million for Intel versus 45,600 million for NVIDIA. Die size differs: 272 mm² versus 378 mm². Transistor density differs: 72.1M per mm² versus 120.6M per mm².

Base clocks differ: 2400 MHz for Intel versus 2295 MHz for NVIDIA. Boost clocks differ: 2400 MHz versus 2452 MHz. Memory clocks differ: 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Memory size differs: 32 GB versus 16 GB. Memory type differs: GDDR6 versus GDDR7. Memory bandwidth differs: 608.0 GB/s versus 896.0 GB/s.

Shading units differ: 2560 versus 8960. TMUs differ: 160 versus 280. ROPs differ: 80 versus 96. Ray tracing cores differ: 20 versus 70. Tensor cores are recorded only for NVIDIA: 280.

Pixel rate differs: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate differs: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 differs: 12.29 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 differs: 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP differs: 200 W versus 350 W. Power connectors differ: 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU differs: 550 W for Intel, none recorded for NVIDIA.

Display outputs differ: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Dimensions are recorded only for NVIDIA: 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 48 mm width.

Release dates differ: Intel was released on 2026-03-31, NVIDIA on 2025-12-31. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 749 USD. The Intel card has no recorded launch MSRP.