Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Pro B60 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. The recorded data shows no wins for either card in direct comparison tests. However, the Intel Arc Pro B60 has a complete set of individual benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark entries. This absence of data for the Dual variant creates a significant analytical gap.

For the Intel Arc Pro B60, the strongest recorded result is in PassMark G3D, where it scores 14580. Its PassMark G2D score is 763. Compute performance, measured by PassMark GPU Compute, reaches 7029. In legacy DirectX tests, the card scores 179 in DirectX 9, 122 in DirectX 11, 76 in DirectX 12, and 61 in DirectX 10. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 2646. The average benchmark score across all tests is 3182.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 sits at the 20th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with an average score of 3163, which is 0.6% behind the B60. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER averages 3075, which is 3.5% lower than the B60. On the other side, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 averages 3210, putting it 0.9% ahead of the B60, and the NVIDIA GeForce 920M averages 3287, which is 3.2% ahead. These deltas indicate that the B60’s average performance places it in a tightly contested mid-range band, with its closest competitor being the Quadro P1000, a professional-grade card from an older generation.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual shows a percentile ranking of 50, which is higher than the B60’s 20th percentile. However, the Dual has an average benchmark score of zero, as no tests have been recorded. The percentile figure for the Dual appears without supporting benchmark data, making direct performance comparisons impossible from the available information. The database records zero wins for each card in head-to-head tests, but this is a function of missing data rather than a performance verdict.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc Pro B60 compare to its closest rival in average score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60’s average benchmark score is 3182. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, scores 3163, which is 0.6% lower. The B60 edges out the Quadro P1000 by a narrow margin, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and GeForce 920M sit slightly ahead of it by 0.9% and 3.2%, respectively.

Q: What is the performance percentile of each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 ranks at the 20th percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual ranks at the 50th percentile. The Dual’s higher percentile is recorded in the database, but it has no benchmark scores to substantiate that ranking.

Q: Do the two cards have identical specifications?

A: Yes, in most core specifications they are identical. Both use the BMG-G21 chip, Xe2-HPG architecture, and 5 nm process node from TSMC. Both have 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, 20 ray tracing cores, 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, and the same clock speeds of 2000 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost.

Q: What is the main difference between the two cards?

A: The primary difference is thermal design power. The Intel Arc Pro B60 has a TDP of 200 W, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W. The Dual also uses a 16-pin power connector and requires an 800 W suggested power supply, whereas the B60 uses an 8-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Dual is physically larger at 300 mm length and 110 mm height, compared to 167 mm and 69 mm for the B60.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has a launch MSRP of 499 USD. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark wins for either card?

A: The database shows zero wins for both the Intel Arc Pro B60 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual in head-to-head comparisons. This reflects the absence of direct test data rather than a measured outcome.

Architecture Differences

Both cards are built on the same underlying silicon: the BMG-G21 chip using Intel’s Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage Pro Series generation. The process node is 5 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The shading unit count is 2560, with 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. Neither card has tensor cores listed. Compute throughput for both is 12.29 TFLOPS for FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture is identical: 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8 for both. Display outputs are four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connectors on each card. API support matches across both: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both cards have a dual-slot cooler design and were released on the same date, 2025-09-04, and both are listed as Active in production status.

The architectural differences are therefore confined to power delivery and physical implementation. The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws a TDP of 200 W via a single 8-pin connector. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual draws a TDP of 400 W via a single 16-pin connector. The suggested power supply scales accordingly, from 550 W for the B60 to 800 W for the Dual. The Dual’s physical dimensions are substantially larger, measuring 300 mm in length and 110 mm in height, versus 167 mm and 69 mm for the B60. Both cards share the same 40 mm width. These changes suggest the Dual variant is engineered for higher sustained power delivery, likely enabling more consistent clock retention under load, though the recorded base and boost clocks remain identical at 2000 MHz and 2400 MHz.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split between the two cards based on power envelope and physical design, while compute specifications remain identical. The Intel Arc Pro B60, with a TDP of 200 W, an 8-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU, is the lower-power option. Its benchmark scores place it at the 20th percentile, with an average score of 3182. It narrowly outperforms the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by 0.6% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER by 3.5%, while trailing the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 by 0.9% and the NVIDIA GeForce 920M by 3.2%. This places it in a competitive mid-range segment, with its strongest showing in PassMark G3D at 14580.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, by contrast, carries a TDP of 400 W, a 16-pin connector, and an 800 W suggested PSU. It is a larger card, at 300 mm length and 110 mm height, compared to the B60’s 167 mm and 69 mm. The Dual has no recorded benchmark scores, and its percentile ranking of 50 is unsupported by test data. The launch MSRP for the B60 is 499 USD, while the Dual’s launch MSRP is 1,199 USD.

From a strict data perspective, the B60 is the only card with measurable performance. Its average score of 3182 and its competitive position against known rivals make it a viable choice for workloads that match its benchmark profile. The Dual, lacking any recorded scores, cannot be verified for performance. The identical core architecture, memory configuration, and clock speeds suggest that the Dual should deliver comparable compute throughput per clock, but the database provides no evidence of a performance advantage from its higher TDP. The 400 W power budget may support more sustained operation under prolonged load, but the recorded boost clock of 2400 MHz is the same for both cards.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Intel Arc Pro B60 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual:

• TDP: 200 W versus 400 W
• Power Connectors: 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: 550 W versus 800 W
• Length: 167 mm (6.6 inches) versus 300 mm (11.8 inches)
• Height: 69 mm (2.7 inches) versus 110 mm (4.3 inches)
• Launch MSRP: 499 USD versus 1,199 USD
• Benchmark Scores: B60 has 8 recorded tests; Dual has none
• Percentile: 20th versus 50th
• Average Benchmark Score: 3182 versus 0

All other specifications are identical, including the chip, architecture, process node, transistors, die size, clocks, memory size, type, bus width, bandwidth, shading units, TMUs, ROPs, RT cores, pixel rate, texture rate, FP32 and FP16 TFLOPS, slot width, bus interface, display outputs, APIs, width, production status, and release date.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins on the basis of recorded performance data. Its benchmark suite includes a PassMark G3D score of 14580 and a PassMark GPU Compute score of 7029, which indicate strong rasterization and compute capabilities for its class. Its average score of 3182 places it ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by 0.6%, a meaningful margin in a professional context where even small deltas matter. The B60 also succeeds on power efficiency, with a 200 W TDP and a 550 W suggested PSU, making it suitable for systems with modest power budgets. Its compact dimensions, 167 mm length and 69 mm height, allow installation in smaller chassis. The launch MSRP of 499 USD reflects a lower entry point for the same core silicon.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on the basis of its higher power envelope and larger physical footprint. The 400 W TDP, 16-pin connector, and 800 W suggested PSU indicate a design intended for maximum power delivery, which could support sustained boost clocks in demanding professional workloads, although the database does not record any benchmark scores to confirm this. The Dual’s 50th percentile ranking, while unsupported by test data, suggests a higher standing in the database’s overall distribution. The larger 300 mm length and 110 mm height accommodate a more substantial cooling solution, which may reduce thermal throttling under sustained load. The launch MSRP of 1,199 USD positions it as a premium variant with a dual-slot cooler for high-end workstations.

For users prioritizing verifiable performance, measured efficiency, and compact installation, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is the only option with supporting evidence. For those requiring the highest power headroom and a larger cooling solution, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual offers that configuration, but its performance claims remain unverified in the recorded data.