AMD Radeon RX 7400 vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Radeon RX 7400 has a full set of benchmark results, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the AMD card's absolute performance numbers and its position relative to other GPUs, with the Intel card's capabilities inferred only from its architectural specifications.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 achieves an average benchmark score of 2467 across all recorded tests. Its strongest result comes from PassMark G3D, where it scores 11897, placing it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 1103, while PassMark GPU Compute shows 5152. Legacy DirectX tests show 176 in DirectX 9, 97 in DirectX 11, 59 in DirectX 10, and 44 in DirectX 12, with a 2D score of 1209.

The nearest rivals for the AMD card in the database are revealing. The AMD Radeon 8040S averages 2440, just 1.1% behind the RX 7400. The NVIDIA GeForce 710M scores 2433, a 1.4% deficit. The Intel HD Graphics 610 averages 2425, trailing by 1.8%. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M rounds out the group at 2422, a 1.9% gap. These margins are remarkably tight, indicating that the RX 7400 sits at the very edge of its performance tier, barely outpacing integrated and entry-level discrete solutions.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual shows zero recorded benchmarks and zero average score, with no nearest rivals listed. The database cannot provide direct performance comparisons for this card. What the data does show is that the Intel card targets a different market position entirely, as evidenced by its specifications and the 50th percentile ranking assigned to it, which is substantially higher than the RX 7400's 17th percentile placement.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge fundamentally in their underlying architectures. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, part of the Navi III generation within the RX 7000 series. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual employs the BMG-G21 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage Pro Series generation. Intel also uses TSMC as the foundry but on a more advanced 5 nm process. The Intel chip packs 19,600 million transistors across a larger 272 mm² die, resulting in a higher transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. This represents a 47.4% increase in transistor count and a 33.3% larger die area compared to the AMD chip, with the denser packing enabled by the smaller process node.

Memory configurations differ dramatically. The AMD card carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card provides 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, achieving 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is three times the capacity and 58.3% more bandwidth for the Intel solution. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel card operates at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective.

Compute resources show a mixed picture. The Intel card has more shading units (2560 versus 1792), more texture mapping units (160 versus 112), and more render output units (80 versus 64). However, the AMD card has more ray tracing cores (28 versus 20). Despite having fewer shading units, the AMD card achieves higher raw FP32 throughput at 16.49 TFLOPS compared to 12.29 TFLOPS for Intel. The FP16 figures follow the same pattern: 32.97 TFLOPS for AMD versus 24.58 TFLOPS for Intel, both at 2:1 ratio.

Clock speeds show the Intel card running higher. Its base clock is 2000 MHz versus 1452 MHz for AMD, and its boost clock reaches 2400 MHz versus 2300 MHz. The AMD card has a game clock of 2200 MHz, while the Intel card has no recorded game clock. Pixel fill rates favor Intel at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 147.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rates also favor Intel at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 257.6 GTexel/s.

The Verdict

The data indicates two cards built for entirely different purposes. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 delivers measurable performance in the database, sitting at the 17th percentile with an average score of 2467. Its nearest rivals are all low-end or integrated solutions, with the closest competitor just 1.1% behind. This places the RX 7400 at the entry level of discrete graphics, barely separating itself from integrated graphics solutions.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual presents a different profile entirely. With no benchmark scores recorded, its 50th percentile ranking signals a mid-range market position. The specifications support this interpretation: 24 GB of memory, 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and a 400 W TDP all point to a professional or workstation-oriented product. The launch MSRP of 1,199 USD, stated once here as recorded, further confirms this positioning.

The thermal and power characteristics reinforce the separation. The AMD card draws a 43 W TDP and requires only a 200 W suggested power supply with a single 6-pin connector. The Intel card draws 400 W TDP and needs an 800 W power supply with a 16-pin connector. These are not competing products in the same segment. The RX 7400 is a low-power entry card, while the Arc Pro B60 is a high-power professional solution.

The architectural data shows Intel holds advantages in memory capacity, bandwidth, and physical dimensions, measuring 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The AMD card has no recorded dimensions. The Intel card shows an active production status and a later release date of September 4, 2025, compared to August 7, 2025 for the AMD card. The AMD card lists a predecessor of Navi II and successor of Navi IV, while the Intel card has neither recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the raw compute performances compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 delivers 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16, both at 2:1 ratios.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has a 43 W TDP with a 200 W suggested power supply and one 6-pin connector. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP with an 800 W suggested power supply and one 16-pin connector.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 20 ray tracing cores, despite the Intel card having more shading units overall.

Q: How does the AMD card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 leads the AMD Radeon 8040S by 1.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce 710M by 1.4%, the Intel HD Graphics 610 by 1.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M by 1.9% in average benchmark scores.

Q: What process nodes and die sizes do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 uses a 6 nm TSMC process with a 204 mm² die containing 13,300 million transistors. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses a 5 nm TSMC process with a 272 mm² die containing 19,600 million transistors.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 wins in raw floating-point compute. Its 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16 exceed the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS and 24.58 TFLOPS respectively, despite the Intel card having more shading units. The AMD card also leads in ray tracing core count with 28 versus 20. The lower 43 W TDP and 200 W suggested power supply make the AMD card far easier to integrate into compact or power-constrained systems. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while older than Intel's PCIe 5.0 x8, still provides adequate bandwidth for its class. The AMD card's display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections, offering flexibility for consumer displays.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins decisively in memory specifications. The 24 GB capacity is triple the AMD card's 8 GB, and the 456.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds 288.0 GB/s by a wide margin. The 192-bit bus width allows greater memory throughput for large datasets. The Intel card also has more shading units (2560 versus 1792), more texture mapping units (160 versus 112), and more render output units (80 versus 64). Higher clock speeds, with a 2000 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, contribute to its superior pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface doubles the per-lane bandwidth available to the AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x8. The four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs suit multi-display professional setups. The 50th percentile ranking indicates the Intel card occupies a higher performance tier than the AMD card's 17th percentile placement.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish, part of the Navi III generation. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture, no recorded codename, and belongs to the Battlemage Pro Series generation.

Process technology differs: AMD uses 6 nm while Intel uses 5 nm, both at TSMC. Transistor counts are 13,300 million for AMD and 19,600 million for Intel. Die sizes are 204 mm² and 272 mm² respectively. Transistor densities are 65.2 million per mm² for AMD and 72.1 million per mm² for Intel.

Clock speeds show AMD at 1452 MHz base, 2300 MHz boost, and 2200 MHz game clock, with 2250 MHz memory clock running at 18 Gbps effective. Intel runs at 2000 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost with no game clock recorded, and 2375 MHz memory clock at 19 Gbps effective. Memory capacity is 8 GB for AMD and 24 GB for Intel, both GDDR6. Bus widths are 128-bit for AMD and 192-bit for Intel, with bandwidths of 288.0 GB/s and 456.0 GB/s respectively.

Compute units differ: AMD has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Intel has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. Pixel rates are 147.2 GPixel/s for AMD and 192.0 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rates are 257.6 GTexel/s for AMD and 384.0 GTexel/s for Intel. FP32 throughput is 16.49 TFLOPS for AMD and 12.29 TFLOPS for Intel.

Power specifications diverge sharply: AMD has a 43 W TDP with a 200 W suggested power supply and one 6-pin connector, while Intel has a 400 W TDP with an 800 W suggested power supply and one 16-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards. Bus interfaces are PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and PCIe 5.0 x8 for Intel. Display outputs are one HDMI 2.1a plus three DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 for Intel. The Intel card has recorded dimensions of 300 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width, while the AMD card has none recorded. Production status is active for Intel with no status recorded for AMD. Release dates are August 7, 2025 for AMD and September 4, 2025 for Intel. The AMD card has a predecessor (Navi II) and successor (Navi IV), while the Intel card has neither recorded.