Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core differences between the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. They differ in shading units (2560 vs 6144), TMUs (160 vs 192), ROPs (80 vs 96), and FP32 compute (12.29 TFLOPS vs 24.58 TFLOPS).

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 456.0 GB/s bandwidth from 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) memory, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA provides 432.0 GB/s from 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Both use 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The Intel card has a 400 W TDP with a suggested 800 W PSU, while the Lisuan card has a 225 W TDP with a suggested 550 W PSU. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and are dual-slot designs.

Q: What display outputs does each card support?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel card also supports PCIe 5.0 x8, whereas the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the release timing for these two products?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual was released on 2025-09-04, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16. The Intel card has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD; the Lisuan card has no listed launch MSRP.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel rate?

A: Both cards achieve 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate. Their texture rates are also identical at 384.0 GTexel/s, despite the Lisuan card having more TMUs and ROPs.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is built on the BMG-G21 chip using Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M / mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The compute configuration differs substantially. The Intel card has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 20 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no dedicated ray tracing cores are listed. This gives the Lisuan card a raw FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, exactly double the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS. FP16 performance follows the same 2:1 ratio, with the Lisuan card at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the Intel card.

Memory architecture is similar in capacity and bus width: both use 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The Intel card runs memory at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Lisuan card runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for 432.0 GB/s. The interface differs: Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while Lisuan uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6; the Intel card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3.

Power delivery and physical dimensions also diverge. The Intel card has a 400 W TDP and requires an 800 W suggested PSU, while the Lisuan card has a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested PSU. Both use a single 16-pin connector. The Intel card is 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide; the Lisuan card is 268 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. Both are dual-slot designs. Display outputs are the key external difference: Intel provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while Lisuan provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins decisively in raw compute throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance is double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. The same doubling applies to FP16 work: 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. This makes the Lisuan card the clear choice for workloads that scale with shading unit count, such as dense parallel computation, large matrix operations, or rendering tasks that heavily utilize shader cores. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs provide more parallel execution resources across the board.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in memory bandwidth, delivering 456.0 GB/s compared to 432.0 GB/s from the Lisuan card. This 24 GB/s advantage, combined with faster effective memory clock (19 Gbps vs 18 Gbps), gives the Intel card an edge in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios where data movement is the limiting factor. The Intel card also supports PCIe 5.0 x8, which offers a newer generation interface than the Lisuan card's PCIe 4.0 x16, potentially reducing host transfer bottlenecks in systems with PCIe 5.0 support. DisplayPort 2.1 support on the Intel card is a generational leap over DisplayPort 1.4a on the Lisuan card, enabling higher display bandwidth for future high-resolution, high-refresh-rate monitors.

Power efficiency strongly favors the Lisuan card. It delivers double the FP32 compute at 225 W TDP, while the Intel card consumes 400 W. The Lisuan card also requires a 550 W suggested PSU versus 800 W for the Intel card, making it more system-friendly in constrained builds. The Intel card's 20 ray tracing cores give it a feature the Lisuan card lacks entirely, which matters for ray-traced rendering or gaming workloads that use dedicated RT hardware.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G21 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Battlemage (Pro Series) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 272 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 2375 MHz | 2250 MHz |

| Memory Bandwidth | 456.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 20 | null |

| FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.58 TFLOPS | 49.15 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 400 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 800 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 300 mm | 268 mm |

| Height | 110 mm | 112 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-09-04 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 1,199 USD | null |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark scores for these two cards. Both cards have zero average benchmark scores and zero wins in direct comparison. Their percentile versus all GPUs is identical at 50, placing both in the middle of the performance distribution. Without direct measured results, the analysis must rely on the architectural specifications and computed throughput values provided.

The most significant numerical gap is in compute throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, again exactly double. This doubling is consistent across both precision levels, indicating a fundamental difference in shading unit count: 6144 versus 2560, a 2.4x ratio in raw shader resources.

However, the Intel card counters in memory bandwidth. Its 456.0 GB/s is 24 GB/s higher than the Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s, a 5.6% advantage. The pixel rate is tied at 192.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is also tied at 384.0 GTexel/s, despite the Lisuan card having more TMUs and ROPs. This suggests that the Intel card's higher clock speeds (2000 MHz base, 2400 MHz boost) partially compensate for its lower resource counts, whereas the Lisuan card's clock rates are not listed.

Power consumption shows a stark divergence. The Intel card draws 400 W TDP, while the Lisuan card draws 225 W TDP. When normalized for compute, the Lisuan card achieves 0.109 TFLOPS per watt (24.58 TFLOPS / 225 W), while the Intel card achieves 0.031 TFLOPS per watt (12.29 TFLOPS / 400 W). The Lisuan card is roughly 3.5x more power-efficient in raw FP32 throughput per watt. The suggested PSU requirement reflects this: 550 W versus 800 W.

The memory clock difference is modest. Intel runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), Lisuan at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This 125 MHz clock advantage, combined with the identical 192-bit bus, produces the 24 GB/s bandwidth gap. Both cards use GDDR6, so the effective bandwidth difference is directly proportional to the clock speed difference.

Interface and connectivity differences are generational. Intel supports PCIe 5.0 x8, which provides a newer protocol generation than the Lisuan card's PCIe 4.0 x16. DisplayPort 2.1 on the Intel card supports higher data rates than DisplayPort 1.4a on the Lisuan card. The Intel card also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card is limited to Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The Verdict

The data indicates two fundamentally different design priorities. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is built for raw compute throughput. Its 6144 shading units and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance place it in a different performance class than the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 2560 shading units and 12.29 TFLOPS. For any workload that scales with shader count, such as general-purpose GPU compute, simulation, or high-resolution rendering without ray tracing, the Lisuan card has a clear 2x advantage in theoretical peak performance. Its lower 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU also make it easier to integrate into existing systems.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is better suited for workloads that prioritize memory bandwidth and modern connectivity. Its 456.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the Lisuan card by 24 GB/s, and its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, and Vulkan 1.4 support represent newer standards. The 20 dedicated ray tracing cores give it a hardware feature the Lisuan card lacks, which is relevant for ray-traced rendering pipelines. Its 400 W TDP and 800 W suggested PSU indicate a higher power draw, but the card compensates with faster memory clocks and a more advanced feature set.

For users selecting between these two, the choice hinges on workload type. Compute-heavy tasks that leverage massive shader parallelism favor the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Bandwidth-sensitive tasks, ray-traced workloads, or systems requiring the latest display and PCIe standards favor the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. The Lisuan card offers double the FP32 and FP16 throughput at nearly half the power draw, making it the more efficient compute solution. The Intel card offers superior memory bandwidth, dedicated ray tracing hardware, and newer interface standards, making it the more feature-complete solution for modern rendering environments.

Both cards sit at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs, and neither has recorded benchmark scores or wins in the database. The architectural evidence, however, shows a clear compute advantage for the Lisuan card and a clear feature advantage for the Intel card. The release dates differ by roughly six months, with the Intel card arriving on 2025-09-04 and the Lisuan card on 2026-03-16. The Intel card has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD, while the Lisuan card has no listed launch MSRP.