Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual versus the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The wins counters for both cards are set to zero, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. This means the comparative performance data cannot be sourced from direct measurements; instead, the analysis must rely on the specification sheets.

Without benchmark scores, the use-case split falls back to architectural capabilities. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on the same 192-bit bus width, providing 432.0 GB/s. The Intel card offers double the memory capacity, which points toward workloads with large frame buffers or datasets that exceed 12 GB. The Lisuan card, with its higher shading unit count and FP32 throughput, appears oriented toward raw compute throughput in scenarios that fit within its smaller memory pool.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The newer PCIe generation on the Intel card provides a higher per-lane bandwidth ceiling, which can matter for data transfers between the GPU and host system. The Lisuan card's PCIe 4.0 x16 still offers substantial bandwidth but at a lower generation.

Display output differences also split use cases. The Intel card provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, supporting newer display standards. The Lisuan card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel card's DisplayPort 2.1 output is positioned for high-resolution or high-refresh-rate monitors that require the newer standard. The Lisuan card's DisplayPort 1.4a remains compatible with a broader installed base of existing displays.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is built on the BMG-G21 chip using the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. The process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. Its process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

The Intel card has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It also includes 20 RT cores. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It lists no RT cores and no tensor cores. The shading unit count on the Lisuan card is 2.4 times that of the Intel card, which directly feeds its higher FP32 throughput.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock listed in the database. Memory clocks are close: the Intel card runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the Lisuan card runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The compute throughput figures show the Lisuan card at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Lisuan card exactly doubles the Intel card's FP32 and FP16 throughput in both cases. Pixel rates are identical at 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rates match at 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and cooling architecture differ. The Intel card has a TDP of 400 W, uses a dual-slot design, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and recommends an 800 W PSU. The Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W, also dual-slot, uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 550 W PSU. The Intel card draws more power but also uses a newer PCIe interface.

API support shows both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards. The wins counter for each card is zero, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. Consequently, there are no measured deltas, no percentile comparisons, and no rival scores to interpret.

The only quantitative comparisons available come from the specification fields. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS versus the Intel card's 24.58 TFLOPS, again a precise doubling. Texture and pixel rates are equal at 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s respectively.

Memory bandwidth favors the Intel card at 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s for the Lisuan card, a difference of 24.0 GB/s. Memory capacity strongly favors the Intel card at 24 GB versus 12 GB. The Intel card also has a higher memory clock at 2375 MHz versus 2250 MHz.

Power consumption favors the Lisuan card at 225 W TDP versus 400 W for the Intel card. The Lisuan card's suggested PSU is 550 W, while the Intel card recommends 800 W. The Intel card uses a 16-pin power connector, the Lisuan card uses an 8-pin connector.

Physical dimensions are close: the Intel card is 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The Lisuan card is 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide. Both are dual-slot designs.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each card have, and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card supports the newer PCIe interface?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses PCIe 5.0 x8. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and recommends an 800 W PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 550 W PSU.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. For Vulkan, the Intel card supports 1.4 while the Lisuan card supports 1.3.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units.

Q: Are there any measured benchmark results comparing these two cards?

A: The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual versus the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The wins counters for both cards are zero.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the choice between these two cards depends on which specification category the workload prioritizes.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins on raw compute throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 are exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's figures. It also has more shading units (6,144 versus 2,560), more TMUs (192 versus 160), and more ROPs (96 versus 80). Its TDP is lower at 225 W versus 400 W, and it requires a smaller PSU (550 W versus 800 W). For workloads that are compute-bound and fit within 12 GB of memory, the Lisuan card's higher throughput and lower power draw make it the data-supported choice.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 is double the Lisuan card's 12 GB, and its 456.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s. It also uses the newer PCIe 5.0 x8 interface versus PCIe 4.0 x16, and supports DisplayPort 2.1 versus DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel card includes 20 RT cores, which the Lisuan card lacks entirely. For workloads that require larger memory footprints, higher memory bandwidth, or hardware ray tracing, the Intel card is the data-supported option.

The Intel card also has a higher memory clock at 2375 MHz versus 2250 MHz, and a higher base clock at 2000 MHz (the Lisuan card has no base or boost clock listed). The Intel card's process node is 5 nm versus 6 nm for the Lisuan card, though the Lisuan card's transistor count and die size are unknown.

The absence of benchmark data means no performance-per-watt, no real-world frame rate comparisons, and no percentile rankings can be cited. The verdict rests entirely on specification differences. Users who need the highest FP32 throughput per watt and can operate within 12 GB of memory should select the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Users who need 24 GB of memory, higher bandwidth, newer display outputs, or RT core support should select the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G21 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Battlemage (Pro Series) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 272 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 2375 MHz 19 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 24 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 456.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 20 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 384.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 400 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 800 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 300 mm 11.8 inches | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | 110 mm 4.3 inches | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | 40 mm 1.6 inches | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release Date | 2025-09-04 | 2026-06-17 |

| Launch MSRP | 1,199 USD | null |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 0 |

The database shows a 20 RT core advantage for the Intel card, a 3,584 shading unit advantage for the Lisuan card, and a 12 GB memory capacity advantage for the Intel card. The Lisuan card's FP32 throughput advantage is 12.29 TFLOPS, exactly the same magnitude as the Intel card's total FP32 output. The Intel card's TDP is 175 W higher than the Lisuan card's TDP. The Intel card's suggested PSU is 250 W higher. The Intel card's release date precedes the Lisuan card's release date by approximately nine months.