Intel Arc Pro B390 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no benchmark scores for either the Intel Arc Pro B390 or the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Both entries show an average benchmark score of zero, with empty benchmark arrays and no head-to-head results. Consequently, there are no wins recorded for either product, and the win tally stands at zero for both sides. The percentile rank for each GPU against all other GPUs in the database is identical at 50, indicating that without actual performance measurements, the database assigns both a median standing. This absence of data means any comparison of frame rates, compute throughput, or synthetic test results is impossible from the available information. What can be analyzed are the theoretical specifications and architectural characteristics, which differ substantially between the two units.

FAQ

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system-shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, a system-dependent bandwidth, and a memory clock tied to the host platform. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and a fixed bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 3.2 times the 60.00 GPixel/s of the Intel Arc Pro B390. Similarly, the LX 7G100 achieves 384.0 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s for the Arc Pro B390, a 3.2x advantage in texture rate as well.

Q: How do the floating-point compute figures compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 (2:1). The Intel Arc Pro B390 provides 7.680 TFLOPS in FP32 and 15.36 TFLOPS in FP16 (2:1). The LX 7G100 is approximately 3.2 times faster in both precision formats.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W, uses no power connectors, and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a slot width of IGP. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, a suggested power supply of 550 W, and occupies a dual-slot form factor.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What are the release dates for these products?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a release date of 2026-01-26, and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a release date of 2026-06-17. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is built on Intel's 3 nm process node at Intel foundry, using the Panther Lake chip and Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process node at TSMC, with the 7G106 chip and a TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. These process differences are significant: the 3 nm node is smaller than 6 nm, but the actual transistor counts and die sizes are listed as unknown for both, so no density comparison is possible.

The Intel part is an integrated GPU (IGP) with a bus interface of IGP, meaning it shares system memory and has no dedicated VRAM. The Lisuan part is a discrete, dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The Arc Pro B390 has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 4 times the shading units, 4 times the TMUs, and 4 times the ROPs of the Intel chip.

Ray tracing support differs: the Intel Arc Pro B390 includes 12 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing core count. Neither product lists tensor cores. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The Lisuan GPU has no base or boost clock listed, but its memory clock is fixed at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel memory clock is listed as "System Shared."

Display outputs also diverge. The Lisuan LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has display outputs described as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its integrated nature. The Lisuan card has physical dimensions of 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The Intel IGP has no listed dimensions.

The Lisuan LX 7G100 has a predecessor field that is null, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 lists "HD Graphics-WM" as its predecessor. Neither has a successor listed. The Lisuan card uses a 225 W TDP and a dual-slot cooler, while the Intel IGP uses 80 W and requires no separate cooling solution beyond the host system.

The Verdict

The data indicates two fundamentally different product categories. The Intel Arc Pro B390 is an integrated graphics solution with system-shared memory, a 1536 shading unit count, and an 80 W power envelope. Its specifications point to a low-power, space-constrained design suitable for portable devices or compact systems where dedicated graphics are not an option. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, 6144 shading units, and a 225 W TDP, requiring a 550 W power supply and an 8-pin connector.

Based on raw compute metrics, the Lisuan LX 7G100 dominates every measured specification. It delivers 3.2 times the pixel rate, 3.2 times the texture rate, and 3.2 times the FP32 throughput compared to the Intel Arc Pro B390. It also has a 192-bit memory bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus system-dependent shared memory. The Intel part does lead in Vulkan version support (1.4 versus 1.3), and it includes ray tracing cores, which the Lisuan part does not list.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is also newer in the database by a few months, with a release date of 2026-01-26 versus 2026-06-17 for the Lisuan. However, release timing does not alter the specification gap. The Lisuan card uses a larger 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel uses a smaller 3 nm node from Intel, but without transistor or die size data, the actual efficiency cannot be determined.

Users with a need for high-throughput compute, large memory buffers, or multi-display setups would find the Lisuan LX 7G100 more capable based on the recorded data. Its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer support demanding workloads. The Intel Arc Pro B390 suits systems where power draw, physical space, and integrated operation are priorities, and where performance demands remain modest.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two products differ.

| Field | Intel Arc Pro B390 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|-------|--------------------|----------------------|

| Manufacturer | Intel | Unknown |

| Chip | Panther Lake | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1536 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 48 | 192 |

| ROPs | 24 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 12 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 60.00 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 120.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.680 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 80 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | null | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | null | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | null | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | null |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2026-06-17 |

Both products share DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 support. Neither lists a transistor count, die size, or launch MSRP in the database. Both are marked as Active production status, and both have a percentile rank of 50.