Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for this pairing is extremely limited. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no individual benchmark scores listed in the database, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has one entry: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 16408 points. This places the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel part sits at the 50th percentile, but with an average benchmark score of zero, meaning no comparable workload results have been recorded for it.

Because there are no head-to-head benchmark entries, the analysis must rely on the single recorded score for the NVIDIA card and its nearest rival comparisons. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell’s 16408 point score puts it essentially tied with the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, which scores 16415 points, a delta of 0%. It is narrowly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT by 0.3% (16361 points) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M by 0.4% (16351 points). The only rival that beats it is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, which posts 16504 points, a 0.6% advantage over the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

This data indicates that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, despite its massive hardware specifications, delivers a 3DMark performance profile that is tightly clustered with mid-range workstation and older consumer cards in this specific test. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no comparable data point, so no direct performance delta can be established. The absence of any benchmark entries for the Intel part means the database cannot currently quantify its real-world performance in any workload.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies and process technologies. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Intel’s 3 nm process node, employing the Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP). The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses the GB202 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm node, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and belongs to the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation.

Transistor counts and die sizes illustrate the scale gap. The Intel part does not have recorded transistor or die size data. The NVIDIA chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. This is a fully discrete, high-end workstation GPU.

The clock behavior differs significantly. The Intel Arc Pro B370 runs at a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost clock. The NVIDIA card runs at a 1590 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost. Memory architecture is entirely different: the Intel part uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, while the NVIDIA card has 96 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 512 bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Compute unit counts show the NVIDIA part’s enormous scale. The Intel GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GPU has 24064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part’s FP32 throughput is 126.0 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Intel part. FP16 performance is 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA versus 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card uses a dual-slot form factor with a 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Intel part is an IGP with no dedicated slot width, power connectors, or dimensions listed. The NVIDIA card requires a 1000 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector; the Intel IGP has no power connectors.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell boosts to 2617 MHz, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 boosts to 2400 MHz.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 512 bit bus and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses Intel’s 3 nm process, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses TSMC’s 5 nm process.

Q: What is the NVIDIA card’s benchmark score and percentile?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any recorded benchmarks?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B370; its average benchmark score is zero and it has no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a 600 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell |

|---|---|---|

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 92,200 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 750 mm² |

| Transistor Density | not listed | 122.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1590 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2617 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 96 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 512 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 1.79 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 1280 | 24064 |

| TMUs | 40 | 752 |

| ROPs | 20 | 192 |

| RT Cores | 10 | 188 |

| Tensor Cores | null | 752 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 502.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 1,968.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 6.144 TFLOPS | 126.0 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 600 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | not listed | 1000 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Length | not listed | 304 mm |

| Height | not listed | 137 mm |

| Width | not listed | 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2025-03-17 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | Workstation Ada |

| Launch MSRP | none | 8,565 USD |

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell wins decisively on every measurable hardware specification in the database. It has substantially more shading units, texture mapping units, raster output units, ray tracing cores, and tensor cores. Its FP32 throughput is over 20 times higher than the Intel part, and its FP16 throughput is over 10 times higher. The NVIDIA card also has dedicated 96 GB of GDDR7 memory with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, versus the Intel part’s system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA card’s pixel rate of 502.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,968.0 GTexel/s dwarf the Intel part’s 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s.

The single recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA card, 16408 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, places it at the 59th percentile. This score is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M. It trails only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 by 0.6%. This result indicates that despite its enormous compute resources, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell’s performance in this particular DirectX 12 workload is comparable to much smaller cards.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its actual performance remains unquantified in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking with a zero average score means it cannot be directly compared to the NVIDIA part on any synthetic or real-world test. The Intel part’s advantages are limited to its 3 nm process node, which is smaller than the NVIDIA part’s 5 nm node, and its dramatically lower power draw of 25 W versus 600 W. The Intel GPU is an integrated processor with no slot width, no power connectors, and a portable device dependent display output, making it suitable for compact, low-power systems.

The NVIDIA card’s 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth and 96 GB capacity make it suited for workloads that require large datasets resident in VRAM. Its 752 tensor cores and 188 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for AI inference and ray tracing workloads. The Intel part, with only 10 RT cores and no tensor cores listed, lacks these dedicated acceleration blocks. The NVIDIA card’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and four DisplayPort 2.1b outputs support high-resolution multi-monitor professional setups. The Intel part’s IGP interface ties it to the host processor’s memory and display capabilities.

The release dates show the NVIDIA card launched earlier, on 2025-03-17, while the Intel part has a 2026-01-26 release date. The NVIDIA card’s predecessor is the Workstation Ada, while the Intel part’s predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded.