Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc Pro B370

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B370 and NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation occupy fundamentally different positions in the workstation GPU landscape. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built for the Panther Lake mobile platform, drawing just 25 W and sharing system memory. The NVIDIA part is a dual-slot discrete workstation card with 32 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory, a 200 W thermal design power, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two products, and neither has an average benchmark score in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370 carries a 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs, as does the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500. With no wins recorded for either side and no benchmark deltas available, the use-case split must be inferred from the architectural and specification data rather than from measured performance.

For integrated, low-power, portable workstation use, the Intel Arc Pro B370 is the clear fit. Its 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, and lack of power connectors mean it requires no additional cooling or power delivery beyond what a Panther Lake laptop or compact system provides. Display output is described as portable device dependent, which aligns with laptop and small-form-factor deployments where the GPU is part of the main processor package.

For dedicated, high-throughput workstation rendering, simulation, and AI inference, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 is the obvious choice. Its 32 GB frame buffer, 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 compute place it in an entirely different performance tier. The 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs indicate a part designed for sustained, heavy compute loads. The 82 ray tracing cores and 328 tensor cores extend its reach into ray-traced visualization and tensor-accelerated workloads.

The Intel part wins on integration efficiency and platform simplicity. The NVIDIA part wins on raw compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth. There is no scenario in the data where these two overlap; they serve different segments of the workstation market.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different foundries and process nodes. Intel uses its own 3 nm process for the Panther Lake chip, while NVIDIA uses TSMC's 5 nm process for the GB203 die. The Intel architecture is Xe3-LPG, part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The NVIDIA architecture is Blackwell 2.0, part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation.

Transistor counts differ dramatically. The NVIDIA GB203 die contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel die size and transistor count are listed as unknown in the database. The NVIDIA chip is a large, discrete GPU; the Intel chip is integrated into a mobile processor package.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with memory type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth. This is a fundamental architectural divergence: shared memory versus dedicated VRAM.

Clock behavior also differs. The Intel part has a 300 MHz base clock and a 2400 MHz boost clock. The NVIDIA part has a 1635 MHz base clock and a 2407 MHz boost clock. Despite the similar boost clocks, the NVIDIA part's much larger shader array and dedicated memory produce far higher throughput. The Intel memory clock is system shared, while the NVIDIA memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

The NVIDIA part includes 328 tensor cores; the Intel part lists no tensor core count. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA part adds a 16-pin power connector and requires a 550 W suggested power supply; the Intel part has no power connectors.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database for these two products. The wins counters for both sides are zero, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. Neither GPU has an average benchmark score. Both sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, which indicates that the database has not yet recorded sufficient performance data to rank them against the broader GPU population.

Without measured scores, the specification sheet provides the only quantitative comparison. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 delivers 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. That places the NVIDIA part at roughly 8 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel part. The FP16 numbers tell a similar story: the NVIDIA part delivers 50.53 TFLOPS at 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part delivers 12.29 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The NVIDIA part achieves 269.6 GPixel/s and 789.5 GTexel/s. The Intel part achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part is roughly 5.6 times faster in pixel fill and 8.2 times faster in texture fill.

Memory bandwidth is the largest gap. The NVIDIA part provides 896.0 GB/s from its 32 GB GDDR7 frame buffer. The Intel part's bandwidth is system dependent, meaning it varies with the host memory configuration. In any realistic system, shared memory bandwidth will be far below 896.0 GB/s, making the NVIDIA part's memory advantage even more pronounced.

The NVIDIA part has 10496 shading units versus 1280 on the Intel part, 328 TMUs versus 40, 112 ROPs versus 20, and 82 RT cores versus 10. Every compute resource on the NVIDIA part is substantially larger.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The following list covers only the fields where the two products differ.

Chip and process: Intel uses Panther Lake on a 3 nm process; NVIDIA uses GB203 on a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Transistors and die: NVIDIA lists 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die with 120.6M/mm² density. Intel lists these fields as unknown.

Base clock: Intel at 300 MHz; NVIDIA at 1635 MHz.

Boost clock: Intel at 2400 MHz; NVIDIA at 2407 MHz.

Memory clock: Intel uses system shared; NVIDIA uses 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective.

Memory size: Intel system shared; NVIDIA 32 GB.

Memory type: Intel system shared; NVIDIA GDDR7.

Memory bus width: Intel system shared; NVIDIA 256 bit.

Memory bandwidth: Intel system dependent; NVIDIA 896.0 GB/s.

Shading units: Intel 1280; NVIDIA 10496.

Texture mapping units: Intel 40; NVIDIA 328.

Raster output units: Intel 20; NVIDIA 112.

Ray tracing cores: Intel 10; NVIDIA 82.

Tensor cores: Intel none listed; NVIDIA 328.

Pixel rate: Intel 48.00 GPixel/s; NVIDIA 269.6 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: Intel 96.00 GTexel/s; NVIDIA 789.5 GTexel/s.

FP32 compute: Intel 6.144 TFLOPS; NVIDIA 50.53 TFLOPS.

FP16 compute: Intel 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1); NVIDIA 50.53 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP: Intel 25 W; NVIDIA 200 W.

Slot width: Intel IGP; NVIDIA dual-slot.

Power connectors: Intel none; NVIDIA 1x 16-pin.

Suggested PSU: Intel none listed; NVIDIA 550 W.

Bus interface: Intel IGP; NVIDIA PCIe 5.0 x16.

Display outputs: Intel portable device dependent; NVIDIA 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Dimensions: Intel none listed; NVIDIA 267 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width.

Release date: Intel 2026-01-26; NVIDIA 2025-03-17.

Predecessor: Intel HD Graphics-WM; NVIDIA Workstation Ada.

Foundry: Intel; TSMC.

Architecture: Intel Xe3-LPG; NVIDIA Blackwell 2.0.

Generation: Intel Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake); NVIDIA Blackwell PRO W (x000).

Manufacturer: Intel; NVIDIA.

The only fields where the two match are DirectX version (12 Ultimate 12_2), OpenGL (4.6), Vulkan (1.4), production status (Active), and percentile against all GPUs (50).

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation delivers 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, compared to 6.144 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc Pro B370.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has a 200 W TDP, a dual-slot form factor, a single 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: When was each GPU released?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation was released on 2025-03-17. The Intel Arc Pro B370 was released on 2026-01-26.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the ray tracing capabilities of each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has 82 ray tracing cores and 328 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores and no listed tensor cores.

Q: How do the process nodes compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 uses TSMC's 5 nm process. The NVIDIA GB203 die measures 378 mm² and contains 45,600 million transistors; the Intel die size and transistor count are listed as unknown in the database.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro B370
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,280
10,496 +720.0%
Shaders
1,280
10,496 +720.0%
TMUs
40
328 +720.0%
ROPs
20
112 +460.0%
SM Count
—
82
Execution Units
10
—
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2407 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
32,768
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
269.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
789.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.144 TFLOPS
50.53 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
768.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
789.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
50.53 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
10
82 +720.0%
Tensor Cores
—
328
XMX Cores
80
—
Power
TDP
25 W
200 W
TDP (W)
25
200 +700.0%
Suggested PSU
—
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Panther Lake
GB203
Generation
Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake)
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,600 million
Die Size
unknown
378 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
—
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
—
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
HD Graphics-WM
Workstation Ada
View Arc Pro B370 Details View RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Workstation Details