Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server. Both processors have zero entries in the benchmark result set, and neither records a win in a shared workload. The absence of measured data means that no direct performance deltas can be quantified from the database at this time.

What can be established from the recorded specifications is the theoretical compute envelope each part occupies. The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers a peak FP32 throughput of 6.144 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server reaches 50.70 TFLOPS in FP32. That is an 8.25x difference in raw single-precision arithmetic throughput in favor of the NVIDIA part, based purely on the recorded peak rates. In FP16 workloads, the gap narrows for the Intel side because it uses a 2:1 ratio, yielding 12.29 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA part sustains 50.70 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card still leads by roughly 4.1x in FP16 peak throughput.

Texture and pixel throughput follow the same pattern. The Intel Arc Pro B370 records a texture fill rate of 96.00 GTexel/s and a pixel fill rate of 48.00 GPixel/s. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server records 792.1 GTexel/s and 270.5 GPixel/s, which translates to approximately 8.25x higher texture throughput and 5.64x higher pixel throughput. These figures are all derived from the clock rates and unit counts in the database, not from application-level tests.

Clock behavior differs substantially between the two. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, a ratio of 8x between idle and peak. The NVIDIA part starts at 1215 MHz base and boosts to 2415 MHz, a much narrower 1.99x range. The NVIDIA boost clock is only 15 MHz higher than the Intel boost clock, but the NVIDIA base clock is 915 MHz higher. This indicates that the NVIDIA card maintains a higher sustained frequency floor while the Intel integrated part spends more time at low clocks when idle.

The memory subsystem shows the largest structural divergence. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, no fixed bus width, and bandwidth described as system dependent. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server carries 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with a recorded bandwidth of 800.3 GB/s and a memory clock of 1563 MHz (25 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA memory bandwidth figure is fixed and independent of the host system, whereas the Intel bandwidth cannot be expressed as a single number because it varies with the platform.

Neither part has recorded benchmarks in the database, so the percentile field shows both at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. This is a default placement, not a measured ranking. Without benchmark scores, the percentile values should not be interpreted as evidence of parity or of any particular standing relative to other accelerators.

Where Each One Wins

The use-case split is defined entirely by the recorded physical and interface characteristics, since no benchmark wins exist in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and a bus interface listed as IGP. It has a slot width of IGP, meaning it occupies no expansion slot. Its display outputs are marked as portable device dependent, which indicates it is designed for systems where the display path is determined by the host device rather than by the GPU itself. This part is suited to compact, low-power platforms that do not support discrete graphics cards. The 300 MHz base clock and 2400 MHz boost clock suggest it can scale up when needed but has a very low floor for power saving. The predecessor is listed as HD Graphics-WM, placing it in Intel's integrated graphics lineage.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server is a discrete, single-slot accelerator with a 165 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 450 W power supply. It has no display outputs, which makes it a compute-only device. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, giving it a full-bandwidth connection to the host. Physical dimensions are recorded as 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. This part is built for server environments where rendering or compute workloads run without any display connection. Its predecessor is Server Hopper and its successor is Server Rubin, confirming its role in NVIDIA's server product stack.

Memory capacity favors the NVIDIA part decisively. The 32 GB GDDR7 frame buffer is a fixed resource that does not contend with the host CPU for bandwidth. The Intel part shares system memory, so its effective capacity and bandwidth depend entirely on the host platform's memory configuration. For workloads that require large resident datasets or sustained memory bandwidth, the NVIDIA part has a clear structural advantage. For workloads that fit within shared memory and tolerate system-dependent bandwidth, the Intel part avoids the overhead of discrete memory management.

Power consumption and cooling requirements are the main areas where the Intel part holds an advantage. At 25 W, it can be cooled by whatever solution the host system already uses. The NVIDIA part at 165 W requires a dedicated cooling solution and a power supply that can handle the load, indicated by the 450 W suggested PSU rating. The Intel part has no power connectors, which simplifies integration. The NVIDIA part requires a 16-pin connector, which limits compatibility with older power supplies.

The production status of both parts is active. The release dates differ by about two months, with the Intel part dated 2026-01-26 and the NVIDIA part dated 2026-03-16. Neither part has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use different underlying designs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM generation. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server uses the GB203 chip with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, belonging to the Server Blackwell generation.

The manufacturing process differs. Intel uses a 3 nm node at Intel's own foundry. NVIDIA uses a 5 nm node at TSMC. The transistor counts are not directly comparable because the Intel part records an unknown transistor count and unknown die size, while the NVIDIA part records 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die with a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

Compute unit counts show a wide gap. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part has 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, 112 raster output units, and 82 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part also has 328 tensor cores, while the Intel part records no tensor core count. The shading unit ratio is 8.2x, the TMU ratio is 8.2x, the ROP ratio is 5.6x, and the RT core ratio is 8.2x.

Tensor core presence is a major architectural differentiator. The NVIDIA part includes 328 tensor cores, which support AI and machine learning workloads. The Intel part records no tensor cores at all, meaning any AI acceleration would rely on the standard shader units. The FP16 performance ratio supports this split: the NVIDIA part achieves FP16 at the same rate as FP32 (50.70 TFLOPS for both), while the Intel part halves the FP32 rate to reach 12.29 TFLOPS FP16. The NVIDIA approach is built for compute-heavy workloads that need both FP32 and FP16 throughput at full rate.

Clock architecture also differs. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The NVIDIA part has a base of 1215 MHz and a boost of 2415 MHz. The NVIDIA part has a higher floor and a slightly higher ceiling. The Intel part has a much wider dynamic range, which is typical for integrated parts that must idle at very low power.

The memory architecture is completely different. Intel uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, no fixed bus width, and system-dependent bandwidth. NVIDIA uses 32 GB of GDDR7 with a 256-bit bus, an 800.3 GB/s bandwidth, and a memory clock of 1563 MHz (25 Gbps effective). The Intel memory clock is also listed as system shared, so there is no dedicated memory clock to compare.

The bus interface and form factor reflect their different deployment targets. The Intel part is an IGP with no slot width and no power connectors. The NVIDIA part is a single-slot PCIe 5.0 x16 card with a 16-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA part has no display outputs, while the Intel part has outputs dependent on the portable device.

API support is identical on paper: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The recorded API levels do not differentiate the two parts.

The NVIDIA part records a successor, Server Rubin, while the Intel part records no successor. The NVIDIA predecessor is Server Hopper, and the Intel predecessor is HD Graphics-WM.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 peak throughput?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server records 50.70 TFLOPS FP32, which is 8.25x higher than the Intel Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have dedicated video memory?

A: No. The Intel part uses system shared memory for both size and type, with a system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has 32 GB of GDDR7 with 800.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 records a 25 W TDP with no power connectors. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server records a 165 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector and a suggested 450 W PSU.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both record DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support.

Q: Which part has tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server records 328 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 records no tensor cores.

Q: What are the release dates for both parts?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 is dated 2026-01-26. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server is dated 2026-03-16. Both are listed as active in production.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Panther Lake | GB203 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 45,600 million |

| Die size | unknown | 378 mm² |

| Transistor density | not recorded | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 1215 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 2415 MHz |

| Memory clock | System Shared | 1563 MHz, 25 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | System Shared | 32 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 800.3 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1280 | 10496 |

| TMUs | 40 | 328 |

| ROPs | 20 | 112 |

| RT cores | 10 | 82 |

| Tensor cores | not recorded | 328 |

| Pixel rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 270.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 792.1 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 50.70 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 50.70 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 165 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | not recorded | 450 W |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| Length | not recorded | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |

| Height | not recorded | 111 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | not recorded | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

| Release date | 2026-01-26 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | Server Hopper |

| Successor | not recorded | Server Rubin |

| Launch MSRP | not recorded | not recorded |

| Benchmark score | 0 | 0 |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 50 | 50 |