Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits these two workstation GPUs into entirely different performance classes. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell holds every recorded benchmark win, which is expected given the scale of the hardware difference. The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database, so its wins cannot be quantified in any test. The recorded data shows 0 wins for Intel and 0 wins for NVIDIA in the head-to-head comparison table, but the NVIDIA side has nine individual benchmark scores available for analysis while the Intel side has none.

Looking at the use-case split, the RTX PRO 4500 demonstrates its strength across DirectX workloads. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7025 indicates strong modern DirectX 12 performance. PassMark results show varying performance across DirectX versions: 397 in DirectX 9, 320 in DirectX 11, 204 in DirectX 10, and 119 in DirectX 12. The Vulkan score of 221768 in Geekbench suggests robust compute and graphics throughput in that API. For compute-oriented tasks, the PassMark GPU compute score of 19255 and the G3D score of 33360 place the card well above average performance levels.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, with its integrated graphics design and system-shared memory, targets a fundamentally different workload profile. Its 25 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it serves portable or compact systems where discrete graphics are not feasible. The database shows no benchmark scores for this part, meaning its performance characteristics remain unmeasured in the current records. The use-case split, therefore, is not about choosing between two comparable performers but about recognizing that the NVIDIA card operates in a performance tier the Intel part cannot approach based on recorded data.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear separation of roles. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, with its 76th percentile ranking among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 31532, is the choice for workloads that demand high throughput in 3D rendering, compute, and modern graphics APIs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX with an average score of 31676 and a delta of -0.5 percent, meaning the RTX PRO 4500 sits within half a percent of that card's average. It also sits 1 percent above the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q and NVIDIA Quadro M5000, both averaging 31220 and 31206 respectively, and 1.1 percent below the Intel Arc Pro A30M at 31894. These tight deltas indicate the RTX PRO 4500 competes in a narrow band of high-end workstation performance.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no benchmark scores, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. Its 3 nm process node and Xe3-LPG architecture are modern, but the 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs represent a fraction of the NVIDIA card's resources. The verdict from the data is straightforward: pick the RTX PRO 4500 for any measured performance requirement, and treat the Arc Pro B370 as a low-power integrated solution whose performance the database cannot currently quantify. The 200 W TDP and dual-slot footprint of the NVIDIA card require a proper desktop workstation, while the Intel part's 25 W TDP and IGP form factor suit embedded or portable designs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are impossible because the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded scores in any test. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, however, provides a complete picture of its own capabilities across nine benchmarks. The strongest absolute result is the Geekbench Vulkan score of 221768, which dwarfs its other recorded figures and indicates exceptional compute throughput in Vulkan environments. The PassMark G3D score of 33360 represents the overall graphics performance measure, while the GPU compute score of 19255 quantifies non-graphics compute workloads.

In DirectX performance, the pattern is uneven. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7025 shows modern API strength, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 119 is the lowest of the DirectX family. PassMark DirectX 9 scores 397, DirectX 11 scores 320, and DirectX 10 scores 204. This inversion between 3DMark and PassMark for DirectX 12 likely reflects different workload characteristics between the two test suites. The PassMark G2D score of 1336 provides a 2D graphics baseline.

Since the Intel card has zero recorded benchmark scores, the head-to-head section must rely entirely on the NVIDIA side of the ledger. The delta percentages against nearest rivals frame the NVIDIA card's position: 0.5 percent below the TITAN RTX, 1 percent above both the GRID M60-1Q and Quadro M5000, and 1.1 percent below the Arc Pro A30M. These margins are small, suggesting the RTX PRO 4500 delivers performance consistent with its direct competitors despite its newer architecture.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B370, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no recorded tests.

Q: What is the highest recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell?

A: The highest score is 221768 in the Geekbench Vulkan test. The next highest is 33360 in PassMark G3D, followed by 19255 in PassMark GPU compute.

Q: How does the RTX PRO 4500 compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA TITAN RTX?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 has an average benchmark score of 31532, while the TITAN RTX averages 31676. The delta is -0.5 percent, meaning the RTX PRO 4500 sits just half a percent below the TITAN RTX in average performance.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell ranks in the 76th percentile, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 uses 32 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM.

Q: Are both GPUs listed as active production parts?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell have a production status of Active in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use entirely different architectures. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on the Xe3-LPG architecture, which is part of the Arc Graphics-WM generation based on the Panther Lake chip. It uses a 3 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on the GB203 chip, with a 5 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The compute resources differ dramatically. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster operation units, and 10 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 ray tracing cores, and 328 tensor cores. The pixel rate for Intel is 48.00 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. NVIDIA delivers 269.6 GPixel/s and 789.5 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance shows 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 for Intel and 50.53 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. The FP16 rates are 12.29 TFLOPS for Intel at a 2:1 ratio and 50.53 TFLOPS for NVIDIA at a 1:1 ratio.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the Intel card's display outputs are portable-device dependent. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel card uses an integrated graphics processor interface. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Intel card has no power connectors and an IGP slot width.

Specification Differences

The specification table shows only the fields where the two GPUs differ, and nearly every field differs.

Manufacturer: Intel versus NVIDIA.

Chip: Panther Lake versus GB203.

Architecture: Xe3-LPG versus Blackwell 2.0.

Generation: Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) versus Blackwell PRO W (x000).

Process node: 3 nm versus 5 nm.

Foundry: Intel versus TSMC.

Transistors: unknown versus 45,600 million.

Die size: unknown versus 378 mm².

Transistor density: null versus 120.6M / mm².

Base clock: 300 MHz versus 1635 MHz.

Boost clock: 2400 MHz versus 2407 MHz.

Memory clock: System Shared versus 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective.

Memory size: System Shared versus 32 GB.

Memory type: System Shared versus GDDR7.

Memory bus width: System Shared versus 256 bit.

Memory bandwidth: System Dependent versus 896.0 GB/s.

Shading units: 1280 versus 10496.

TMUs: 40 versus 328.

ROPs: 20 versus 112.

RT cores: 10 versus 82.

Tensor cores: null versus 328.

Pixel rate: 48.00 GPixel/s versus 269.6 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: 96.00 GTexel/s versus 789.5 GTexel/s.

FP32: 6.144 TFLOPS versus 50.53 TFLOPS.

FP16: 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 50.53 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP: 25 W versus 200 W.

Slot width: IGP versus Dual-slot.

Power connectors: None versus 1x 16-pin.

Suggested PSU: null versus 550 W.

Bus interface: IGP versus PCIe 5.0 x16.

Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Dimensions: null versus 267 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width.

Release date: 2026-01-26 versus 2025-03-17.

Predecessor: HD Graphics-WM versus Workstation Ada.

Percentile: 50 versus 76.

Average benchmark score: 0 versus 31532.

Nearest rivals: none versus four entries including TITAN RTX, GRID M60-1Q, Quadro M5000, and Arc Pro A30M.

The two GPUs share identical API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, and both have no launch MSRP recorded in the database.