Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for this comparison is one-sided. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no entry in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF posts a score of 2910. This absence of data for the Intel part means no direct head-to-head percentage deltas can be calculated from our measurements. The NVIDIA card’s score places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database, a position that indicates it sits below the median performer in the overall distribution.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the NVIDIA card, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF finishes essentially tied with the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, which averages 2907, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the NVIDIA Pro card. It also lands within 0.1% of the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), meaning the two cards are statistically indistinguishable in this workload. The Quadro P600 posts 2923, putting it 0.4% ahead, while the GeForce RTX 4010 scores 2893, 0.6% behind. The practical takeaway is that the NVIDIA card delivers performance consistent with the mid-range GeForce RTX 40-series parts in this specific DX12 test, not a class-leading result.

For the Intel Arc Pro B370, the lack of a recorded benchmark score means the database shows zero wins for either side in head-to-head comparisons. The Intel part’s average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50, which is the median for all GPUs. That percentile figure should not be read as a performance statement; it reflects the absence of measured data rather than a tested result. Without a Steel Nomad score, any direct numerical comparison between these two cards is impossible from the available facts.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. Intel uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The NVIDIA part uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, made on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. Intel does not disclose transistor count or die size for its part.

Memory configuration diverges sharply. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM; capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF carries 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks are 1125 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer for the NVIDIA card, while the Intel part’s memory clock is listed as system shared.

Compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. NVIDIA’s card has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. Intel’s part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with no tensor core count listed. The NVIDIA card’s FP32 throughput is 24.05 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is the same at 24.05 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. Intel delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 128.8 GPixel/s for NVIDIA versus 48.00 GPixel/s for Intel, and texture rate is 375.8 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

Power and physical design also separate the two. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is rated at 70 W TDP, is dual-slot, uses no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W PSU. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x8 and measures 167 mm by 69 mm by 40 mm. The Arc Pro B370 runs at 25 W TDP, is an IGP with no slot width, uses no power connectors, and connects through the IGP bus interface. Display outputs for the Intel part are portable device dependent, while NVIDIA provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Clock behavior is notable. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The NVIDIA card starts at 405 MHz base and boosts to 1342 MHz. Despite the lower boost clock, the NVIDIA part’s massive shader count produces far higher throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF wins in every measured category because it is the only one with recorded data. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it produces a score of 2910, which is effectively equal to the RTX 4060 Ti family and slightly above the RTX 4010. The NVIDIA card’s dedicated 24 GB GDDR7 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth gives it a clear advantage in any workload that requires large working sets or high memory throughput, as the Intel part must rely on system memory that is not specified.

For compute-heavy tasks, NVIDIA’s 24.05 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance, along with 280 tensor cores, positions it well for rendering, AI inference, and simulation workloads. The Intel part’s 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 are lower but still usable for lighter tasks, and its 2:1 FP16 ratio indicates it can double FP16 throughput when needed.

The Arc Pro B370 wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 25 W TDP is far below the 70 W TDP of the NVIDIA card. For systems where heat and power draw are tightly constrained, such as thin laptops or compact integrated designs, the Intel part uses significantly less power. However, this advantage comes with a large performance deficit. The Intel card is an IGP, so it requires no separate slot or power connection, making it suitable for portable devices. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot SFF card with no power connectors but needs a 250 W PSU recommendation.

In terms of release timing, NVIDIA’s card launched on 2025-08-10, while Intel’s part is dated 2026-01-26. NVIDIA’s predecessor is Workstation Ada, and Intel’s predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. Both are currently active in production.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has 8960 shading units, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: The NVIDIA card uses 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card uses system-shared memory, so size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent.

Q: How do their FP32 compute performances compare?

A: NVIDIA delivers 24.05 TFLOPS FP32, while Intel delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA card is roughly 3.9 times higher in raw FP32 throughput.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 is rated at 25 W, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is rated at 70 W.

Q: Do both support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the NVIDIA card’s performance relative to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the NVIDIA card scores 2910 versus 2907 for the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the NVIDIA Pro card.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on intended use. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is the only one of the two with a measured benchmark score, and that score of 2910 places it on par with the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 8 GB models. For any workload requiring dedicated graphics memory, high FP32 throughput, or tensor core acceleration, the NVIDIA card is the only viable choice from the recorded specifications. Its 70 W TDP is modest for the performance class, and its dual-slot SFF design fits compact workstation builds.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, no dedicated memory, and no measured benchmark results. Its role is limited to portable devices where system-shared memory and minimal power draw are acceptable. The 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 output is sufficient for basic rendering or compute, but it cannot match the NVIDIA card’s 24.05 TFLOPS. The 10 RT cores and 1280 shading units on Intel’s part are entry-level figures compared to NVIDIA’s 70 RT cores and 8960 shading units.

For a builder choosing between a discrete SFF workstation card and an integrated solution, the benchmark data only supports the NVIDIA part. The absence of any Intel score means no performance equivalency can be established. The NVIDIA card’s release date of 2025-08-10 and active production status make it a current option, while Intel’s 2026-01-26 date suggests a newer but unverified part. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is the card to select when measured performance is required.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 45,600 million |

| Die size | unknown | 378 mm² |

| Transistor density | not listed | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 405 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 1342 MHz |

| Memory clock | System Shared | 1125 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1280 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 40 | 280 |

| ROPs | 20 | 96 |

| RT cores | 10 | 70 |

| Tensor cores | not listed | 280 |

| Pixel rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 128.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 375.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 24.05 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 24.05 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 70 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | None |

| Suggested PSU | not listed | 250 W |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | not listed | 167 mm x 69 mm x 40 mm |

| Release date | 2026-01-26 | 2025-08-10 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | Workstation Ada |

| Benchmark score | 0 | 2910 |

| Percentile | 50 | 19 |