Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no shared benchmark results between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. The Intel part has no entries in the benchmark database, while the NVIDIA card has nine recorded tests. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. What can be established is that the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell holds a percentile rank of 72 among all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile. That gap indicates a substantial performance difference, but the absence of a common test suite means any head-to-head comparison must rely on the NVIDIA card's absolute scores and its position against other rivals.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell delivers 4648 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a modern DirectX 12 workload. Its Geekbench Vulkan score reaches 194168, and the Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 28427 with a GPU compute score of 14805. These numbers place the card near the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which averages 27425, a delta of -1.1% meaning the NVIDIA card trails by that margin. It also sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile at 27435, again -1.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 at 27565, a -1.6% gap. Against the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26683, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 1.7%. The average benchmark score for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is 27135.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded scores, so it cannot be positioned against these rivals or against the NVIDIA card using measured data. The database shows zero wins for each product in head-to-head comparisons, confirming that no direct tests exist.

The Verdict

From the available data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the only product with measurable performance. It holds a 72nd percentile rank among all GPUs, which puts it in the upper quarter of the database. Its average benchmark score of 27135 places it in the same performance band as desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, both of which are established high-end parts. The 1.7% lead over the RTX A4000 shows it outperforms that previous-generation workstation card.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no benchmark entries and an average score of zero. Its 50th percentile rank is purely positional, not derived from measured results. This means the data cannot support any claim of competitive performance for the Intel part. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the only option with verified performance, and it performs at a level consistent with high-end desktop GPUs from the previous generation.

Buyers seeking a card with documented benchmark results should choose the NVIDIA part. The Intel Arc Pro B370 offers no measured data to justify selection on performance grounds.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use entirely different underlying designs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor, whereas the NVIDIA card is a discrete add-in board. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and its memory bandwidth is system dependent. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock for the NVIDIA card is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate.

Compute resources differ sharply. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 ROPs. The NVIDIA card has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Ray tracing cores number 10 on the Intel part versus 70 on the NVIDIA card. The NVIDIA card also includes 280 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists none. Pixel rate for the Intel GPU is 48.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card reaches 197.3 GPixel/s, 575.4 GTexel/s, and 36.83 TFLOPS FP32. Half-precision rates also differ: the Intel part delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA card delivers 36.83 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Clock speeds show a different design philosophy. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The NVIDIA card starts at 1230 MHz base and boosts to 2055 MHz. Despite the lower base clock, the Intel part boosts higher, but its much smaller compute footprint limits overall throughput.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the Intel part is an IGP with no separate bus interface. Power requirements reflect the form factor difference: the Intel GPU has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors, while the NVIDIA card has a 140 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The NVIDIA card is single-slot with dimensions of 241 mm length, 111 mm height, and 20 mm width. The Intel part is an integrated processor with no listed dimensions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell delivers 36.83 TFLOPS FP32, which is six times the 6.144 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc Pro B370.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have dedicated video memory?

A: No. The Intel part uses system-shared memory for both size and type, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. The NVIDIA card has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory.

Q: How does the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA card averages 27135, while the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT averages 27425. The NVIDIA card trails by 1.1%.

Q: What is the transistor count of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell?

A: The GB203 chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die with a density of 120.6 million transistors per mm².

Q: Are both GPUs compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes. Both the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has a 140 W TDP and requires a single 16-pin connector with a 300 W suggested PSU.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell wins in every measurable category. Its pixel rate of 197.3 GPixel/s is more than four times the Intel part's 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture rate of 575.4 GTexel/s compares to 96.00 GTexel/s on the Intel GPU, a six-fold advantage. FP32 throughput of 36.83 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS gives the NVIDIA card a 6x lead in raw compute. Memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s versus system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth makes the NVIDIA card the clear choice for memory-intensive workloads. The 24 GB GDDR7 capacity also dwarfs the Intel part's reliance on shared system RAM.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP versus 140 W means it consumes far less power. It requires no power connectors and fits as an integrated processor, making it suitable for compact systems where a discrete GPU cannot fit. Its boost clock of 2400 MHz exceeds the NVIDIA card's 2055 MHz boost, though this does not translate into higher throughput given the smaller compute configuration. The Intel part also has no listed dimensions, reinforcing its role as an embedded or mobile solution rather than a standalone card.

For workstation use with large datasets, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the only logical choice. Its 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 36.83 TFLOPS FP32 performance handle professional rendering and compute tasks. The Intel Arc Pro B370 cannot match these specifications and has no benchmark data to suggest otherwise. For ultra-low-power integrated graphics in portable or embedded devices, the Intel part's 25 W TDP and system-shared memory model fit that niche.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm Intel process. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses a GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process. The NVIDIA chip has 45,600 million transistors, while the Intel chip's transistor count is unknown.

Memory configurations could not be more different. The Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 24 GB GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock at 28 Gbps effective.

Compute units show a massive gap. The Intel GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GPU has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 70 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card adds 280 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists none.

Clock speeds: Intel runs at 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. NVIDIA runs at 1230 MHz base and 2055 MHz boost.

Rates: Intel achieves 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate, 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). NVIDIA achieves 197.3 GPixel/s, 575.4 GTexel/s, 36.83 TFLOPS FP32, and 36.83 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1).

Power and form factor: Intel has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no bus interface. NVIDIA has a 140 W TDP, single-slot width, one 16-pin power connector, a 300 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. NVIDIA dimensions are 241 mm by 111 mm by 20 mm; Intel has no listed dimensions.

Display outputs: Intel is portable device dependent, while NVIDIA provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Both share the same API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates differ: Intel on 2026-01-26, NVIDIA on 2025-03-17. Production status is active for both. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded, and neither product lists a successor.