Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the fundamental difference in how the two GPUs are packaged?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width, no power connectors, and a bus interface of IGP. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a dual-slot discrete card using a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, with no power connectors but a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a boost clock of 1957 MHz.

Q: How much memory does each GPU offer?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU achieves a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell ranks in the 70th percentile. The Intel Arc Pro B370 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the manufacturing details of each chip?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel foundry, with the Panther Lake chip and Xe3-LPG architecture. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, with the GB206 chip and Blackwell 2.0 architecture, containing 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die.

Q: What is the FP32 compute output of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers 17.03 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on the Xe3-LPG architecture using the Panther Lake chip, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. It is an integrated part with no discrete memory, relying entirely on system shared memory. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and it has no dedicated tensor cores.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 21,900 million transistors across 181 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². This is a discrete card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute resources differ sharply. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part has 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 34 RT cores, and 136 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card has more than three times the shading units and more than three times the RT cores.

Clock behavior also differs. Intel runs at a 300 MHz base with a 2400 MHz boost. NVIDIA runs at 982 MHz base with a 1957 MHz boost. Despite the lower boost clock, the NVIDIA part achieves higher throughput because of its larger execution resource pool. The FP32 figures confirm this: Intel delivers 6.144 TFLOPS, NVIDIA delivers 17.03 TFLOPS. The FP16 numbers also differ, with Intel at 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) and NVIDIA at 17.03 TFLOPS (1:1), meaning NVIDIA does not trade off FP16 throughput.

Power envelopes are very different. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a TDP of 70 W. The Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors, while the NVIDIA card also has no power connectors but suggests a 250 W PSU. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot, measuring 167 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm, with four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The Intel part's display outputs are portable device dependent.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card was released on 2025-08-10, while the Intel part was released on 2026-01-26.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct comparison data between the two GPUs is not recorded in the database, so the analysis relies on each part's absolute scores and percentile positions. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries and an average benchmark score of zero, placing it in the 50th percentile. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a substantial set of recorded measurements and an average benchmark score of 25269, placing it in the 70th percentile.

The NVIDIA card's individual results show its strengths across different APIs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2374.5. In Geekbench OpenCL it scores 106087, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 113865. In Passmark G3D it scores 20049, with a GPU compute score of 8396. The G2D score is 1303. The DirectX legacy tests show 241 in DX9, 174 in DX11, 122 in DX10, and 80 in DX12.

The relative standing of the NVIDIA card against its nearest rivals helps contextualize its performance. It sits 1.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, 1.8% below the AMD Radeon Pro W5700, and 1.8% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. It sits 2% above the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile. These deltas are small, indicating the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell performs in a tight band around these mobile and workstation parts.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot place it against any rivals. Its 50th percentile placement is based on the aggregate of all GPUs, but with zero average score, the recorded data does not support any specific performance claims. The only quantitative facts available for the Intel part are its clock rates, compute throughput, and pixel and texture rates: 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate. The NVIDIA card outputs 93.94 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s, roughly double and nearly triple the Intel rates respectively.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear separation. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the higher-performing part in every measurable category: FP32 compute is 2.77 times higher, pixel rate is about 1.96 times higher, texture rate is about 2.77 times higher, shading units are 3.4 times higher, and RT cores are 3.4 times higher. It has dedicated 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part depends on system shared memory.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, however, operates at a 25 W TDP compared to 70 W for the NVIDIA card, and it is an integrated solution with no slot requirement. Its 2400 MHz boost clock is higher than NVIDIA's 1957 MHz, but that clock advantage does not translate into higher throughput given the smaller execution resource pool.

For users selecting a discrete workstation card, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the only option of the two that has recorded benchmark data. It delivers competitive scores relative to its nearest rivals, within 2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, AMD Radeon Pro W5700, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, and 2% above the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile.

For systems requiring an integrated GPU with minimal power draw, the Intel Arc Pro B370 fits that role with a 25 W TDP, but the database contains no benchmark results to validate its performance in actual workloads. The choice between the two is therefore not a performance contest in the recorded data; it is a question of form factor and power envelope.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel foundry, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA part has a known transistor count of 21,900 million and a die size of 181 mm²; the Intel part lists both as unknown.

Base clocks differ: 300 MHz for Intel versus 982 MHz for NVIDIA. Boost clocks differ: 2400 MHz for Intel versus 1957 MHz for NVIDIA. Memory is system shared for Intel versus 16 GB GDDR7 for NVIDIA, with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth versus system-dependent bandwidth.

Compute resources differ: Intel has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. NVIDIA has 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 34 RT cores. NVIDIA also has 136 tensor cores; Intel has none listed.

Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s for Intel versus 93.94 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s for Intel versus 266.2 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 is 6.144 TFLOPS for Intel versus 17.03 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel versus 17.03 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA.

TDP is 25 W for Intel versus 70 W for NVIDIA. Slot width is IGP for Intel versus dual-slot for NVIDIA. Power connectors are none for both, but NVIDIA lists a suggested PSU of 250 W. Bus interface is IGP for Intel versus PCIe 5.0 x8 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel versus 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b for NVIDIA.

Release dates differ: 2026-01-26 for Intel versus 2025-08-10 for NVIDIA. The Intel predecessor is HD Graphics-WM; the NVIDIA predecessor is Workstation Ada. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell wins in every recorded performance dimension. Its FP32 compute of 17.03 TFLOPS is 2.77 times the Intel part's 6.144 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 93.94 GPixel/s is nearly double Intel's 48.00 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s is 2.77 times Intel's 96.00 GTexel/s. It has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel relies on system shared memory. It also carries 136 tensor cores, which the Intel part lacks entirely.

The NVIDIA card's benchmark scores place it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 25269. Its nearest rival comparisons show it within 1.4% to 1.8% of three other GPUs and 2% above the RTX A5000 Mobile, indicating it is a solid mid-upper tier performer in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is less than half of NVIDIA's 70 W. It is an IGP with no slot requirement, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU, making it suitable for compact or portable systems where a discrete card cannot be installed. Its boost clock of 2400 MHz is higher than NVIDIA's 1957 MHz, and its 3 nm process node is smaller than NVIDIA's 5 nm node, though the Intel transistor count is unknown.

The use-case split is straightforward from the data. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the choice for any workload requiring the recorded performance levels: higher compute throughput, dedicated memory, tensor cores, and a dual-slot form factor with four mini-DisplayPort outputs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is the choice for systems that need an integrated GPU with a 25 W TDP, no discrete slot, and no additional power supply requirements. The database contains no benchmark scores for the Intel part, so any performance expectation for it must be inferred from its compute rates and clock specifications rather than measured results.