Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two accelerators is asymmetrical. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries in the database, while the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation has a full suite of eight test results. This means a direct score-to-score comparison is not possible for most workloads. The RTX 5880's average benchmark score is 45,972, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than a literal performance result.

For the NVIDIA part, the strongest result is in Geekbench OpenCL with 326,898 points. This is a compute-oriented workload, and the score indicates substantial throughput capacity. In the Passmark suite, the G3D score of 25,096 is the second-highest recorded figure, while the GPU compute score of 14,208 confirms that the card handles both graphics and general-purpose compute tasks. The DirectX 11 result of 228 and DirectX 9 result of 335 show backward compatibility, though the DirectX 12 score of 70 is notably lower, which may reflect driver optimization patterns or test methodology rather than raw capability.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 5880 provide context. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46,043, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Arc A730M scores 45,592, putting the RTX 5880 0.8% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384, making the RTX 5880 1.3% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46,601, which is 1.4% higher than the RTX 5880. These deltas are all within a narrow band, suggesting that the RTX 5880's average performance is tightly clustered with these mid-range competitors, despite its much larger memory capacity and higher shading unit count.

The Intel part has no nearest rivals listed and no wins recorded. The database shows zero wins for both sides in head-to-head benchmarks, but this is a structural artifact. The Intel Arc Pro B370's benchmark array is empty, so there is nothing to compare. The data indicates that the RTX 5880's percentile ranking of 85 versus the Intel's 50 is based on the available measurements, with the Intel's position derived from hardware specifications rather than tested scores.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation wins in every category where data exists. Its 48 GB GDDR6 memory with a 384-bit bus and 864.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a clear advantage in memory-intensive workloads. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, which means it cannot guarantee a fixed memory performance level. The RTX 5880's 69.27 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 69.27 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) rate indicate that it can handle both single-precision and half-precision compute tasks at identical speeds. The Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), so its half-precision rate is double its single-precision rate, a common pattern for consumer-oriented architectures.

In rasterization, the RTX 5880's pixel rate of 433.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,082.4 GTexel/s far exceed the Arc Pro B370's 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card has 176 ROPs and 440 TMUs compared to 20 ROPs and 40 TMUs on the Intel part. For ray tracing, the RTX 5880 includes 110 RT cores and 440 tensor cores, while the Arc Pro B370 has 10 RT cores and no tensor core entry. The Intel part's 1,280 shading units are dwarfed by the RTX 5880's 14,080 shading units.

The Intel Arc Pro B370's advantage lies in its power profile. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the RTX 5880's 285 W TDP. The Intel part requires no power connectors and uses an integrated graphics processor (IGP) slot width, while the NVIDIA card is dual-slot with a single 16-pin connector and a suggested 600 W PSU. The Intel part's 3 nm process node from Intel Foundry is smaller than the NVIDIA card's 5 nm node from TSMC. The Intel part is also newer, with a release date of 2026-01-26 compared to the RTX 5880's release on 2024-01-04.

Architecture Differences

The two accelerators use fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. Its chip is codenamed Panther Lake and uses a 3 nm process from Intel's own foundry. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD102 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The NVIDIA part has a transistor count of 76,300 million on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3 million per square millimeter. The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, which limits deeper comparison.

The memory architectures are completely different. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, meaning it draws from the host system's RAM with no dedicated VRAM. Its memory clock is also system-shared, and bandwidth is system-dependent. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 has 48 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on a 384-bit bus, delivering 864.0 GB/s of fixed bandwidth. This is a fundamental difference in how memory is accessed and how predictable performance will be.

The compute configurations differ sharply. The Intel part has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The NVIDIA part has 14,080 shading units, 440 TMUs, 176 ROPs, and 110 RT cores. The NVIDIA card also includes 440 tensor cores, which the Intel part does not list. The FP32 throughput difference is more than an order of magnitude: 69.27 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS. The FP16 rates are 69.27 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA and 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA card's display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its IGP nature. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot, 267 mm long, 112 mm high discrete card, while the Intel part is an integrated GPU with no dimensions listed.

The Verdict

The data separates these two parts clearly. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a high-performance discrete workstation accelerator with a 48 GB memory pool, 864.0 GB/s bandwidth, 69.27 TFLOPS FP32, and 110 RT cores. Its average benchmark score of 45,972 and 85th percentile ranking place it among capable workstation GPUs. Its nearest rivals, the RTX A2000, Arc A730M, Radeon Pro 5500 XT, and Radeon RX 5600M, all sit within a 1.4% delta, indicating that the RTX 5880's average score is competitive with those parts despite its much larger memory and compute resources.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated GPU with a 25 W TDP, system-shared memory, and 1,280 shading units. It has no benchmark scores in the database, so its 50th percentile ranking is derived from specifications rather than measurements. Its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are appropriate for low-power integrated graphics in portable devices, but they are orders of magnitude below the NVIDIA part's figures.

For users who need dedicated, high-throughput compute and graphics with large VRAM capacity, the RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the only option with measured data supporting its performance. For systems that require minimal power draw and integrated graphics, the Arc Pro B370 fits that role. The RTX 5880's 285 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU are substantial requirements, while the Intel part's 25 W TDP and no power connectors make it suitable for compact, low-power designs. The choice depends entirely on whether the workload requires the RTX 5880's measured compute capacity or the Arc Pro B370's integrated efficiency.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Intel Arc Pro B370 has an empty benchmarks array. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's average benchmark score?

A: The average benchmark score is 45,972, which places it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs tracked.

Q: How much memory does the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation have?

A: It has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus with 864.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc Pro B370?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with system-shared type and bus width. Its bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: How do the FP32 throughput figures compare?

A: The RTX 5880 Ada Generation delivers 69.27 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What are the TDP requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP with no power connectors. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation has a 285 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector and a suggested 600 W PSU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Unknown | 76,300 million |

| Die Size | Unknown | 609 mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 975 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2460 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 48 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 384 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 864.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1,280 | 14,080 |

| TMUs | 40 | 440 |

| ROPs | 20 | 176 |

| RT Cores | 10 | 110 |

| Tensor Cores | None listed | 440 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 433.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 1,082.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 69.27 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 69.27 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None listed | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2024-01-04 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |