Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation. The Intel part has no benchmark entries in the database, while the NVIDIA GPU carries a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596.

That score places the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada at the 21st percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the GeForce GT 545 scores 3594 (0.1% behind), the GeForce GT 735M scores 3616 (0.6% ahead), the GeForce GTX 1050 scores 3629 (0.9% ahead), and the Radeon HD 6770 scores 3649 (1.5% ahead). The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada sits in the middle of this group, effectively matching all four in synthetic load.

Because the Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark score and no nearest rivals listed, its percentile rank of 50 is a placeholder rather than a measured result. The database contains zero wins for either part in head-to-head testing. Any comparison of raw performance between the two must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct measurements.

The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means its 50th percentile placement does not reflect a tested outcome. The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada’s 21st percentile, by contrast, derives from an actual 3DMark Steel Nomad run. The delta between the two percentile positions suggests the NVIDIA part underperforms relative to the broader GPU population in that specific test, but no comparable figure exists for the Intel product.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip’s transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The Intel part integrates 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part fields 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. The Intel architecture does not list a tensor core count, while NVIDIA’s tensor cores are a defining feature for AI workloads.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The Intel chip runs at a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. The NVIDIA chip runs at a 1425 MHz base and 2115 MHz boost. Despite the lower base clock, the Intel part’s boost clock exceeds the NVIDIA part’s boost clock by 285 MHz.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part’s memory clock is listed as system shared, while the NVIDIA memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

Compute throughput favors NVIDIA heavily in raw numbers. The Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The NVIDIA part delivers 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 41.15 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). NVIDIA’s FP32 throughput is roughly 6.7 times higher, and its FP16 throughput is roughly 3.3 times higher. Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern: Intel achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s, while NVIDIA achieves 236.9 GPixel/s and 643.0 GTexel/s.

Power and interface details also diverge. The Intel part has a 25 W TDP, while the NVIDIA part has a 120 W TDP. Both are integrated graphics packages with no power connectors and no dedicated slot width beyond IGP. The Intel part uses an IGP bus interface, while the NVIDIA part uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Both list display outputs as portable device dependent.

API support is identical across DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates differ: the Intel part launched on 2026-01-26, while the NVIDIA part launched on 2023-03-20. The NVIDIA part’s predecessor is Ampere-MW and its successor is Blackwell-MW; the Intel part’s predecessor is HD Graphics-WM.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw FP32 compute?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation delivers 41.15 TFLOPS FP32, which is approximately 6.7 times the Intel Arc Pro B370’s 6.144 TFLOPS.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with type, bus width, and bandwidth dependent on the host. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the architectures differ in process node and foundry?

A: Intel uses a 3 nm process at its own foundry with Xe3-LPG architecture on the Panther Lake chip. NVIDIA uses a 5 nm TSMC process with Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD103 chip.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the Intel part?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B370. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada has one recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The NVIDIA chip contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The Intel chip’s transistor count is listed as unknown in the database.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Panther Lake | AD103 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 379 mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1425 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2115 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 576.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 1280 | 9728 |

| TMUs | 40 | 304 |

| ROPs | 20 | 112 |

| RT Cores | 10 | 76 |

| Tensor Cores | null | 304 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 236.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 643.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 41.15 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 41.15 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 120 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2023-03-20 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | Ampere-MW |

| Successor | null | Blackwell-MW |

The Verdict

The data shows two GPUs designed for different roles. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is a low-power integrated processor with a 25 W TDP, system shared memory, and an IGP bus interface. It targets portable devices where minimal power draw and shared memory are acceptable. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is a high-performance mobile part with a 120 W TDP, 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6, PCIe 4.0 x16, and a full complement of compute resources.

For compute-heavy workloads, the NVIDIA part is the clear choice from the recorded specifications. Its 41.15 TFLOPS FP32, 643.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 236.9 GPixel/s pixel rate dwarf the Intel part’s 6.144 TFLOPS, 96.00 GTexel/s, and 48.00 GPixel/s. The NVIDIA part also provides 304 tensor cores, which the Intel part lacks entirely. Ray tracing hardware favors NVIDIA as well with 76 RT cores versus 10.

For power-constrained designs, the Intel part offers a 95 W lower TDP envelope. Its 300 MHz base clock and 2400 MHz boost clock indicate a part that can scale dynamically, but the system shared memory architecture means performance depends heavily on the host platform. The NVIDIA part’s dedicated 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides consistent, predictable memory throughput that the Intel part cannot match.

The only recorded benchmark belongs to the NVIDIA part, scoring 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it at the 21st percentile and effectively tied with older discrete GPUs like the GTX 1050. The Intel part has no measured results, so its 50th percentile rank is not evidence of competitive performance. The database indicates zero wins for either part in head-to-head testing.

The verdict from the data: the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is the higher-performing part by every measured specification, suitable for workloads that demand dedicated memory, tensor cores, and high compute throughput. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is the lower-power alternative with a newer process node and a later release date, but its performance remains unquantified in the database. Users who prioritize raw capability should select the NVIDIA part; users who prioritize power efficiency and integrated simplicity have only specifications, not benchmark results, to guide them.