Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between these two GPUs is effectively one-sided, as the recorded database shows no head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The Intel part carries an average benchmark score of 0, while the NVIDIA card posts an average score of 178050 across three recorded tests. This places the RTX 4090 D in the 98th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile, a position that reflects its status as an integrated graphics processor rather than a discrete competitor.

The NVIDIA card's benchmark results show substantial compute capability. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 8587 points. Its Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 278621, and the Vulkan result comes in at 246941. These numbers place the RTX 4090 D within striking distance of professional workstation cards. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell with an average score of 182109, a delta of -2.2 percent, meaning the RTX 4090 D trails that card by a narrow margin. The A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183725, a -3.1 percent delta. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation reaches 184664, a -3.6 percent delta. The A100 SXM4 40 GB tops the group at 187147, a -4.9 percent delta. The RTX 4090 D sits just below these professional-grade accelerators, confirming its position as a top-tier consumer part.

For the Intel Arc Pro B370, no benchmark scores exist in the database, so no direct numerical comparison can be drawn. The data indicates the Intel part is an integrated GPU with 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operations units. Its FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. These figures place it in a fundamentally different performance class than the RTX 4090 D, which delivers 73.54 TFLOPS FP32, 443.5 GPixel/s, and 1,149.1 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card is roughly 12 times faster in FP32 throughput based on the recorded specifications, though no direct head-to-head test confirms this in practice.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages with distinct design priorities. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture built on Intel's Panther Lake chip. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D uses the Ada Lovelace architecture built on the AD102 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The transistor counts reflect the scale difference: the RTX 4090 D contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Memory architecture separates these two fundamentally. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. Its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system dependent, with the clock speed for memory also marked as system shared. The NVIDIA card uses 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. This dedicated memory subsystem gives the RTX 4090 D a massive advantage in bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the Intel part's shared memory approach means its performance depends entirely on the host system's RAM configuration.

Compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The RTX 4090 D packs 14592 shading units, 456 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 114 RT cores, and 456 tensor cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with no tensor core count listed. The NVIDIA card's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 73.54 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 via a 2:1 ratio. Clock speeds also differ: the Intel GPU runs at a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, while the NVIDIA card operates at 2280 MHz base and 2520 MHz boost.

Power and physical design reflect the performance gap. The Intel Arc Pro B370 draws 25 W TDP and uses no power connectors, fitting as an integrated graphics processor with an IGP bus interface. The RTX 4090 D consumes 425 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and needs a suggested 800 W power supply. The NVIDIA card is a triple-slot design measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. The Intel part's dimensions are not listed, as it is embedded in the host processor. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel part uses IGP.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4090 D wins in every measurable compute category recorded in the database. Its 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 1,149.1 GTexel/s texture rate position it for demanding rendering tasks, AI inference, and high-resolution gaming. The 24 GB GDDR6X memory with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth supports large datasets and high-resolution textures without spilling to system memory. The 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling workloads, though the database does not list specific ray tracing benchmark scores.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the NVIDIA card's 425 W, making it suitable for compact systems without dedicated power delivery. It requires no power connectors and uses system shared memory, eliminating the need for a discrete memory subsystem. The 3 nm process node suggests modern manufacturing efficiency, though the database does not provide direct efficiency comparisons. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, matching the API feature set of the NVIDIA card. Its 10 RT cores provide basic ray tracing capability, but at a scale far below the RTX 4090 D's 114 RT cores.

For portable or low-power devices, the Arc Pro B370's integrated nature means it fits into systems where a discrete GPU cannot. Its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, indicating flexibility across different host platforms. The NVIDIA card offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which suits desktop workstation setups with multiple monitors.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of roles. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is a high-end discrete GPU for users who need maximum compute throughput. Its 98th percentile ranking, 178050 average benchmark score, and proximity to professional workstation cards like the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and A100 SXM4 variants confirm its capability for heavy rendering, simulation, and compute workloads. The 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 figure and 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth place it far outside the range of integrated graphics.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 serves a completely different purpose. As an integrated GPU with 25 W TDP, it targets systems where power draw and physical space are constrained. Its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest but sufficient for basic graphics output, light productivity, and entry-level gaming. The 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the GPU performance distribution, which for an integrated part is a reasonable position.

The RTX 4090 D is marked as end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, while the Intel part is active with a release date in early 2026. The NVIDIA card launched with a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD. The Intel part has no recorded launch MSRP. Users requiring maximum performance should choose the RTX 4090 D based on its benchmark dominance. Users requiring integrated graphics with minimal power draw should choose the Arc Pro B370. The two products do not compete in the same market segment, and the database shows no benchmark scenario where the Intel part outperforms the NVIDIA card.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark wins against the RTX 4090 D?

A: No. The database records zero wins for the Intel part and zero wins for the NVIDIA card in head-to-head benchmarks. No direct comparison tests exist, but the RTX 4090 D has an average benchmark score of 178050 while the Arc Pro B370 has no recorded scores.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, and its memory bandwidth is system dependent. The NVIDIA RTX 4090 D uses 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth and 21 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP and uses no power connectors. The NVIDIA RTX 4090 D has a 425 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and needs a suggested 800 W power supply.

Q: Which GPU supports more advanced APIs?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API feature sets are identical according to the database.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 D still in production?

A: No. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is marked as end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is listed as active.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 D compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4090 D trails the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2 percent, the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1 percent, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6 percent, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.9 percent in average benchmark scores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Chip | Panther Lake | AD102 |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Unknown | 76,300 million |

| Die Size | Unknown | 609 mm² |

| Transistor Density | Not listed | 125.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2280 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2520 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 384 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 1.01 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 1280 | 14592 |

| TMUs | 40 | 456 |

| ROPs | 20 | 176 |

| RT Cores | 10 | 114 |

| Tensor Cores | Not listed | 456 |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 443.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 1,149.1 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Throughput | 6.144 TFLOPS | 73.54 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Throughput | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 73.54 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 425 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 800 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 304 mm x 137 mm x 61 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2023-12-27 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | Not listed | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 1,599 USD |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 98 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 178050 |