Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the fundamental positioning difference between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on Intel's 3 nm Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board based on the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture and a 12 GB GDDR6X frame buffer on a 192-bit bus.

Q: How do the raw compute specifications compare between the two?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 35.48 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), whereas the Arc Pro B370 provides 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). In terms of shading resources, the NVIDIA part has 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, versus 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs on the Intel part.

Q: What memory configuration does each product use?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER uses a dedicated 12 GB GDDR6X memory pool with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, with the bus width, type, and size all listed as system-dependent, and bandwidth varies by the host system.

Q: How do the recorded benchmark results compare?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a recorded average benchmark score of 43223 and sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores and lists an average benchmark score of 0, placing it at the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the power and physical characteristics of each board?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a 220 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, a single 16-pin power connector, and measures 267 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, uses no external power connectors, and is packaged as an IGP with slot width listed as IGP.

Q: What is the production and release status for both products?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER launched on January 16, 2024, has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, and is marked end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. The Arc Pro B370 is listed as active, released on January 26, 2026, and its predecessor is HD Graphics-WM.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits cleanly along form factor and workload boundaries. The RTX 4070 SUPER wins every category where sustained rendering throughput matters. Its pixel rate reaches 198.0 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro B370, and its texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s is more than five times the 96.00 GTexel/s of the Intel part. In FP32 compute, the NVIDIA card produces 35.48 TFLOPS, roughly 5.8 times the 6.144 TFLOPS of the Arc Pro B370. In FP16, the difference narrows but remains large: 35.48 TFLOPS against 12.29 TFLOPS.

The Arc Pro B370 wins on integration and power envelope. Its 25 W TDP compared to 220 W for the RTX 4070 SUPER makes it suitable for platforms where discrete power delivery is not available. It requires no power connectors, occupies no expansion slot, and uses system-shared memory, which eliminates dedicated VRAM cost. Its base clock of 300 MHz is far lower than the 1980 MHz of the RTX 4070 SUPER, but the boost clock of 2400 MHz versus 2475 MHz shows that the integrated part can scale up significantly under load.

For portability-dependent use cases, the Arc Pro B370 has the advantage of being embedded in the Panther Lake chip with no board dimensions listed, whereas the RTX 4070 SUPER requires a 267 mm long, dual-slot installation with a 16-pin power connection and a 550 W suggested PSU. The database shows the RTX 4070 SUPER with a 83rd percentile ranking versus the 50th percentile of the Arc Pro B370, confirming that the NVIDIA product dominates the performance distribution.

Architecture Differences

The two products come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel, part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel chip integrates the GPU directly into the Panther Lake processor, while the NVIDIA part is a separate AD104 discrete GPU with its own memory subsystem.

Ray tracing resources differ substantially. The RTX 4070 SUPER carries 56 RT cores, while the Arc Pro B370 has 10 RT cores. Tensor capability also differs: the NVIDIA card includes 224 tensor cores, whereas the Intel part does not list any tensor core count. The NVIDIA GPU has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The Intel GPU lists unknown transistor count and die size.

Memory architecture is a fundamental split. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses dedicated GDDR6X memory clocked at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective data rate, delivering 504.2 GB/s over a 192-bit interface. The Arc Pro B370 relies entirely on system-shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, no fixed bus width, and bandwidth that is system dependent. This means the Intel part's memory performance is not a fixed property of the GPU but varies with the host platform's memory configuration.

Compute capability in FP16 also reveals architectural differences. The RTX 4070 SUPER operates at 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, both at 35.48 TFLOPS, indicating unified throughput across precisions. The Arc Pro B370 runs FP16 at 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio relative to its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, showing that it doubles throughput in half precision. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature levels are matched.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, while the Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory size is 12 GB GDDR6X on the NVIDIA side versus system-shared on the Intel side. Bus width is 192 bit versus system shared, and bandwidth is 504.2 GB/s versus system dependent.

Shading resources differ by a factor of 5.6 for shading units (7168 versus 1280), 5.6 for TMUs (224 versus 40), and 4 for ROPs (80 versus 20). RT cores number 56 versus 10, and tensor cores are 224 versus none listed. Pixel rate is 198.0 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 554.4 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 35.48 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 35.48 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS.

Power specifications show the largest proportional gap. The RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220 W TDP and requires a 16-pin power connector with a 550 W suggested PSU, while the Arc Pro B370 draws 25 W TDP and requires no power connector. Slot width is dual-slot for the NVIDIA card versus IGP for the Intel part. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX 4070 SUPER and IGP for the Arc Pro B370.

The RTX 4070 SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Arc Pro B370 lists display outputs as portable device dependent. Physical dimensions for the NVIDIA card are 267 mm length, 112 mm height, and 42 mm width, with no dimensions listed for the Intel integrated part. The NVIDIA GPU has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die with 121.8M per mm² density, while the Intel part lists unknown values for all three.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records ten benchmark results for the RTX 4070 SUPER and none for the Arc Pro B370, so the head-to-head comparison relies on the NVIDIA card's absolute scores and the Intel part's absence from the benchmark suite. The RTX 4070 SUPER posts an average benchmark score of 43223, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The Arc Pro B370 shows 0 average score at the 50th percentile, indicating that no validated benchmark runs exist in the database for the Intel integrated part.

The strongest recorded results for the RTX 4070 SUPER come from compute-oriented tests. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 205624, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 172795. These numbers show the NVIDIA card's strength in general-purpose compute workloads where the tensor cores and 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can be exercised. The PassMark G3D score of 29995 further confirms substantial graphics performance, while PassMark GPU Compute reaches 17108.

Older DirectX paths show lower relative performance on the RTX 4070 SUPER. PassMark DirectX 9 scores 344, DirectX 11 scores 273, DirectX 10 scores 167, and DirectX 12 scores 110. The DirectX 12 score being the lowest of the four suggests that the PassMark DirectX 12 test may not fully utilize the Ada Lovelace architecture's feature set, or that the test's workload profile does not match the card's strengths. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 provides a more modern measure of DirectX 12 performance.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4070 SUPER in the database all have average scores within about one percent. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the Quadro M6000 scores 43301 with a delta of -0.2 percent, and the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667 with a delta of -1 percent. These tight deltas place the RTX 4070 SUPER in a dense performance cluster where the top four rivals are separated by only one percentage point.

The Arc Pro B370 has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark scores, so its performance cannot be positioned against any competing part in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking with zero average score reflects that the ranking is based on no measured data. The RTX 4070 SUPER, by contrast, sits at the 83rd percentile with a substantial body of benchmark evidence across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads.