Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the fundamental difference in how the Intel Arc Pro B370 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 are positioned in the database?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 25 W TDP, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 200 W TDP and a 1x 16-pin power connector. The RTX 4070 sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, whereas the Arc Pro B370 sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its average sits at 0.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 4070 is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37,628), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37,507), 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37,157), and 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135).

Q: What are the memory configurations of these two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 is listed as Active in production, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is listed as End-of-life. The RTX 4070's predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series.

Q: What are the shading unit counts for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The Arc Pro B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on Intel's 3 nm process and uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with a Panther Lake chip, part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 uses TSMC's 5 nm process with the Ada Lovelace architecture and an AD104 chip from the GeForce 40-series. The foundries differ as well: Intel fabricates the B370 in-house, while TSMC produces the RTX 4070.

The RTX 4070 has a die size of 294 mm² and 35,800 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The Arc Pro B370's transistor count and die size are both listed as unknown in the database. The clock behavior also differs sharply. The Arc Pro B370 has a 300 MHz base clock and a 2,400 MHz boost clock, while the RTX 4070 has a 1,920 MHz base clock and a 2,475 MHz boost clock. Memory clocks are not directly comparable because the B370 uses system shared memory, whereas the RTX 4070 runs its GDDR6X at 1,313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective.

The compute resources differ by a wide margin. The RTX 4070 carries 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores, with no tensor core count listed. The pixel rate for the RTX 4070 is 158.4 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the B370. Texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

FP32 throughput shows the same pattern: the RTX 4070 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS, while the B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1) on the RTX 4070 and 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) on the B370. The interface standards differ as well: the B370 is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and portable device dependent display outputs, while the RTX 4070 is a dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so the API feature set is identical. The production status differs: the B370 is Active, the RTX 4070 is End-of-life. Release dates are far apart, with the RTX 4070 launching in 2023 and the B370 in 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The wins count for each side is zero in the recorded head-to-head data. However, the RTX 4070's standalone benchmark suite provides context for its performance tier.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4070 records a score of 3,854. Geekbench results show 154,858 in the OpenCL test and 174,152 in the Vulkan test. PassMark results are more varied across API generations: DirectX 9 scores 320, DirectX 10 scores 139, DirectX 11 scores 244, and DirectX 12 scores 103. The PassMark G2D score is 1,164, while the G3D score reaches 26,927. GPU compute in PassMark is 14,720.

The RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37,648 places it near a tight cluster of rivals. The closest is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37,628, a difference of only 0.1%. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 sits at 37,507, which is 0.4% behind. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 is at 37,157, or 1.3% behind. On the other side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile reaches 38,135, putting it 1.3% ahead of the RTX 4070. This grouping shows that the RTX 4070's average score is tightly bounded by its nearest competitors, with no rival in the list more than 1.3% away in either direction.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark records in the database, so no direct performance comparison can be drawn from measured results. The B370's percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs, while the RTX 4070's 81st percentile places it well above the median. The absence of benchmark data for the B370 means the percentile figure is not supported by any recorded test scores in the database.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The process node is 3 nm for Intel versus 5 nm for NVIDIA. The foundry is Intel for the B370 and TSMC for the RTX 4070. Transistor count is unknown for the B370 versus 35,800 million for the RTX 4070. Die size is unknown for the B370 versus 294 mm² for the RTX 4070. Transistor density is not listed for the B370 versus 121.8M per mm² for the RTX 4070.

Base clock is 300 MHz versus 1,920 MHz. Boost clock is 2,400 MHz versus 2,475 MHz. Memory size is system shared versus 12 GB. Memory type is system shared versus GDDR6X. Bus width is system shared versus 192 bit. Bandwidth is system dependent versus 504.2 GB/s. Memory clock is system shared versus 1,313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective.

Shading units are 1,280 versus 5,888. TMUs are 40 versus 184. ROPs are 20 versus 64. Ray tracing cores are 10 versus 46. Tensor cores are not listed for the B370 versus 184 for the RTX 4070. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s versus 158.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s versus 455.4 GTexel/s. FP32 is 6.144 TFLOPS versus 29.15 TFLOPS. FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP is 25 W versus 200 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU is not listed for the B370 versus 550 W for the RTX 4070. Bus interface is IGP versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions are not listed for the B370; the RTX 4070 measures 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Production status is Active versus End-of-life. Release date is 2026 versus 2023. The RTX 4070 has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The B370 has no launch MSRP listed.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to two entirely different product categories. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated GPU with a 25 W TDP, no dedicated memory, no power connectors, and no measured benchmarks in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs, but that ranking is unsupported by any recorded test scores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 200 W TDP, 12 GB of GDDR6X, a 504.2 GB/s memory bus, and a full suite of benchmark results.

The RTX 4070's average score of 37,648 places it in the 81st percentile, with nearest rivals all within 1.3% of its average. Its FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS is roughly 4.7 times the B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s is more than three times the B370's 48.00 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s is nearly five times the B370's 96.00 GTexel/s.

The B370's 10 ray tracing cores and lack of tensor core data make its feature set difficult to assess against the RTX 4070's 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The B370's system shared memory approach means bandwidth is system dependent, so performance would scale with the host platform rather than being fixed by the GPU itself.

For users selecting a GPU strictly from database measurements, the RTX 4070 is the only one of the two with recorded performance data. Its benchmark results show a GPU that clusters tightly with the Tesla P4, RX Vega 56, Radeon PRO W6400, and RTX 4080 Mobile. The B370's active production status and integrated form factor suggest a different use case, one aimed at portable devices where the 25 W TDP and lack of external power connectors are defining characteristics. The RTX 4070's end-of-life status and 599 USD launch MSRP reflect a product that has already been succeeded by the GeForce 50 series.

The data does not support a direct performance comparison because the B370 has no benchmark entries. What the data does show is that the RTX 4070 is a measured, high-percentile discrete GPU, while the B370 is an unmeasured integrated part at the median percentile. The choice between them depends entirely on whether the system requires an integrated solution or a discrete card with dedicated memory and measured performance.