Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Pro B370 versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q. The wins tally for both parts stands at zero, and the average benchmark score for each is zero. Consequently, a direct performance comparison through measured data is not available at this time.

What can be established from the recorded specifications is a theoretical performance envelope. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q delivers a higher raw compute throughput, with FP32 performance rated at 9.032 TFLOPS, which exceeds the Intel Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS by 47%. In FP16 compute, the Intel part reaches 12.29 TFLOPS using a 2:1 rate, while the NVIDIA part sustains 9.032 TFLOPS at a 1:1 rate, giving Intel a 36% advantage in that specific precision mode.

Texture and pixel throughput also favor the NVIDIA solution. The RTX 4060 Max-Q produces 141.1 GTexel/s and 70.56 GPixel/s, versus the Arc Pro B370's 96.00 GTexel/s and 48.00 GPixel/s. These figures indicate the NVIDIA GPU holds a 47% lead in texture fill and a 47% lead in pixel fill. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists.

The absence of empirical benchmark data means no statement about real-world application performance can be made from the database. The analysis above relies strictly on the recorded clock rates, shader counts, and derived throughput figures. Until head-to-head results are populated, the relative standing of these two mobile GPUs in gaming or professional workloads remains unmeasured.

FAQ

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q is rated at 9.032 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA part leads by 47% in this metric.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q has a boost clock of 1470 MHz. The Intel part runs at a 63% higher boost frequency.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth, so no fixed capacity or bandwidth figure is recorded.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q has a TDP of 35 W. The Intel part consumes 10 W less power according to the recorded specifications.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q has 3072 shading units and 96 TMUs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units and 40 TMUs, giving NVIDIA a 140% and 140% advantage, respectively.

Q: Are there architectural differences in ray tracing and tensor compute?

A: Yes. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q has 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, providing more dedicated hardware for both ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on the Panther Lake chip using the Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated by Intel on a 3 nm process. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q uses the AD107 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, and belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation.

The Intel GPU integrates 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster operation pipelines, and 10 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores. The NVIDIA GPU contains 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 ray tracing cores, and 96 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part also reports a transistor count of 18,900 million on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 relies on system-shared memory, with the memory type, bus width, and bandwidth all marked as system-dependent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q uses dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a fixed 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Clock behavior differs notably. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The NVIDIA GPU has a base clock of 1140 MHz and a boost of 1470 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system-shared.

The NVIDIA GPU supports FP16 compute at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning both are 9.032 TFLOPS. The Intel GPU supports FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, yielding 12.29 TFLOPS, which exceeds its own FP32 rate.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded hardware specification except for their API support and slot width.

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q |

|---------------|-------------------|------------------------------|

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Process node | 3 nm (Intel) | 5 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | Unknown | 18,900 million |

| Die size | Unknown | 159 mm² |

| Transistor density | Not listed | 118.9M / mm² |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 1140 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 1470 MHz |

| Memory size | System Shared | 8 GB GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 256.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1280 | 3072 |

| TMUs | 40 | 96 |

| ROPs | 20 | 48 |

| Ray tracing cores | 10 | 24 |

| Tensor cores | None | 96 |

| Pixel rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 70.56 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 141.1 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 9.032 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.032 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 35 W |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Release date | 2026-01-26 | 2023-01-02 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | GeForce 30 Mobile |

| Successor | Not listed | GeForce 50 Mobile |

Both parts share a slot width of IGP, no power connectors, portable-device-dependent display outputs, and identical API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

Based on recorded specifications, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q is the stronger candidate for raw graphics compute. It leads in FP32 throughput by 47%, in texture rate by 47%, and in pixel rate by 47%. It also provides 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the Intel Arc Pro B370 depends on system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 counters with a higher boost clock of 2400 MHz versus 1470 MHz, a higher FP16 rate of 12.29 TFLOPS versus 9.032 TFLOPS, and a lower TDP of 25 W versus 35 W. It also uses a smaller 3 nm process node compared to the NVIDIA part's 5 nm node.

For users prioritizing sustained FP32 performance, dedicated memory bandwidth, and tensor-core acceleration, the data points to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q. For those seeking lower power draw, higher FP16 throughput, and a more recent integration in an Intel Panther Lake platform, the Intel Arc Pro B370 presents the relevant specifications.

Neither part has recorded benchmark scores or percentile data beyond a shared 50th percentile placement against all GPUs. The database's average benchmark score for both is zero, and no head-to-head results exist. The verdict above derives entirely from the specification sheet, not from measured performance.