Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two parts cleanly by role. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor, built into the Panther Lake chip as an IGP with no separate card footprint. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a discrete single-slot adapter with its own 4 GB GDDR6 memory and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. For systems that need a dedicated output stage with fixed video memory, the RTX 4010 holds the structural advantage. It has four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a 163 mm board length, and a 69 mm height, making it a compact add-in card for small chassis. The Arc Pro B370 instead relies entirely on the host device for display routing, listed as “Portable Device Dependent” for its outputs.

In raw compute throughput, the Intel part wins decisively. The Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 12.29 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 4010 produces 2.706 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio. That puts the Arc at roughly 2.27 times the FP32 rate and 4.54 times the FP16 rate. The texture and pixel fill rates follow the same pattern: the Arc reaches 96.00 GTexel/s and 48.00 GPixel/s, while the RTX 4010 manages 42.29 GTexel/s and 28.19 GPixel/s. For shader-heavy workloads, the Intel part is the stronger compute engine.

The RTX 4010 wins on memory independence and power efficiency per fixed allocation. It has a dedicated 4 GB GDDR6 pool on a 64-bit bus, with 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth and memory clocked at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro B370 shares system memory, with bandwidth described as “System Dependent.” That means the Arc’s memory performance cannot be measured in isolation; it varies with the host platform. The RTX 4010 also has a fixed 50 W TDP with no power connectors, while the Arc has a lower 25 W TDP but is an IGP, so its power draw is part of the whole chip.

The single benchmark entry in the database favors the RTX 4010. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2893. The Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores, so its percentile versus all GPUs is 50 by default, while the RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile. The RTX 4010 also has a measurable average benchmark score of 2893, whereas the Arc’s average is 0. That gives the NVIDIA part a concrete performance record, but the Intel part’s compute specifications suggest it would outperform in synthetic FP32/FP16 tests if such data existed.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different process nodes and foundries. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry, built on the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses an 8 nm process at Samsung, based on the Ampere architecture with the GA107 chip. The transistor counts differ sharply: the RTX 4010 contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, giving a density of 43.5M per mm². The Arc Pro B370’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density comparison is possible.

Shader configuration favors Intel in raw count. The Arc has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 6 RT cores. Intel’s part also has no tensor cores listed, while the RTX 4010 carries 24 tensor cores. That difference matters for AI-accelerated workloads: NVIDIA’s tensor cores are a dedicated resource, whereas the Arc’s data sheet does not enumerate any equivalent.

Clock behavior diverges substantially. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, a wide dynamic range typical of integrated parts that scale with thermal and power headroom. The RTX 4010 has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost of 1762 MHz, a much narrower range. The Arc’s boost clock is 638 MHz higher, which contributes to its higher fill rates and TFLOPS figures despite the lower base.

Memory architecture is the largest functional split. The Arc uses system shared memory for both capacity and type, with the bus width also system shared. The RTX 4010 has a fixed 4 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 64-bit bus. That means the RTX 4010 provides predictable memory behavior, while the Arc’s memory performance is contingent on the host system’s RAM speed and allocation policy.

The RTX 4010 exposes its display outputs as four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The Arc Pro B370 lists its outputs as portable device dependent, implying it drives internal panels or vendor-specific ports rather than standard external connectors. The RTX 4010 is a single-slot card, 163 mm long and 69 mm tall, with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Arc is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU.

API support is identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status for both is Active. Release dates differ by nearly two years: the RTX 4010 launched on 2024-04-15, while the Arc Pro B370 launched on 2026-01-26.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32, which is 2.27 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does the RTX 4010 have, and what type?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s and memory clocked at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Q: What memory does the Intel Arc Pro B370 use?

A: The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory for capacity, type, and bus width, with bandwidth described as “System Dependent.”

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has 6.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50 W.

Q: Which GPU has a recorded benchmark score?

A: Only the RTX 4010 has a recorded benchmark score: 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every hardware field. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm Intel process, while the RTX 4010 uses an 8 nm Samsung process. The RTX 4010 has a known transistor count of 8,700 million and a die size of 200 mm², yielding 43.5M transistors per mm². The Arc’s transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock speeds: the Arc has a 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost; the RTX 4010 has a 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost. Memory: the Arc uses system shared memory; the RTX 4010 uses 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth and 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) memory clock.

Compute units: the Arc has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. The Arc lists no tensor cores.

Fill rates: the Arc produces 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s; the RTX 4010 produces 28.19 GPixel/s and 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32: the Arc is at 6.144 TFLOPS; the RTX 4010 is at 2.706 TFLOPS. FP16: the Arc is at 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio; the RTX 4010 is at 2.706 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical: the Arc has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP, single-slot width, no power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX 4010 is 163 mm long and 69 mm tall. The Arc has no listed dimensions.

Bus and outputs: the Arc uses an IGP bus interface; the RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The Arc’s display outputs are portable device dependent; the RTX 4010 has 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a.

Release: the Arc launched 2026-01-26; the RTX 4010 launched 2024-04-15. The Arc’s predecessor is HD Graphics-WM; the RTX 4010’s predecessor is GeForce 30 and successor is GeForce 50.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. The only recorded benchmark belongs to the RTX 4010: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893. That score places the RTX 4010 at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2893. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries, an average score of 0, and a default percentile of 50.

The RTX 4010’s nearest rivals in the database provide context for its 2893 score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, which is 0.5% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910, 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2923, 1% higher. All four rivals are within one percentage point of the RTX 4010, meaning the 2893 result sits at the edge of a tight cluster.

The Intel part’s compute specifications, while not benchmarked, indicate a large theoretical advantage. In FP32, the Arc’s 6.144 TFLOPS is 2.27 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Arc’s 12.29 TFLOPS is 4.54 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s versus 42.29 GTexel/s, a 2.27x margin. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s versus 28.19 GPixel/s, a 1.70x margin.

These margins suggest that in synthetic compute and fill-rate tests, the Arc Pro B370 would dominate, assuming the system shared memory does not bottleneck. The RTX 4010’s fixed 96.00 GB/s bandwidth gives it a predictable memory ceiling, while the Arc’s system dependent bandwidth could range from slower to faster depending on the host platform.

The RTX 4010’s tensor cores (24 of them) are the only dedicated AI hardware in this comparison. The Arc has none listed. That makes the RTX 4010 the better choice for workloads that use tensor core acceleration, despite its lower raw FP32 throughput. The Arc’s high FP16 rate with a 2:1 ratio could be used for similar purposes, but without tensor cores, the implementation path differs.

The RTX 4010’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory is fixed and dedicated, which avoids the contention that integrated graphics face when sharing system RAM. The Arc’s system shared memory has no fixed capacity, so it can address more than 4 GB if the host has enough RAM, but the bandwidth remains unknown.

The percentile gap is notable. The RTX 4010 sits at the 18th percentile, which is low in the global distribution, yet its nearest rivals all score within 1% higher. That suggests the 2893 Steel Nomad result is representative of a narrow performance band. The Arc’s default 50th percentile is not based on any measured result, so it should not be interpreted as a real ranking.

The release timeline also matters. The RTX 4010 launched in April 2024, and the Arc Pro B370 in January 2026. The Arc is a newer part with a smaller process node and higher clock ceiling, but it lacks the discrete memory and tensor cores of the older NVIDIA part. The data shows two different design philosophies: Intel maximizing compute density in an integrated envelope, NVIDIA providing a self-contained discrete card with fixed resources.