Intel Arc Graphics 64EU vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy completely different positions in the performance spectrum. The data shows a clear split: the Intel part is an integrated graphics solution designed for light duty, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete, high-throughput accelerator.

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU scores 733 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, both scoring exactly 733 points with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails by 1.4% at 723 points, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M leads by 2.4% at 751 points. These results indicate that the 64EU sits at the very entry level of graphics performance, essentially tied with lower EU count variants of the same architecture.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the midpoint of all GPUs, but without a Steel Nomad score, no direct comparison in that specific test is possible. The LX PRO instead wins on raw specification headroom: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Intel part has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute against 1.946 TFLOPS for the Intel part, a 12.6x advantage in raw shader throughput.

The benchmark wins are therefore split by workload class. For lightweight desktop graphics, integrated display output, and power-constrained systems, the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is the functional choice. For compute-heavy rendering, high-resolution texture work, or any task that saturates a 192-bit memory bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO dominates on paper.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share very little beyond both using TSMC as foundry and both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is built on the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arrow Lake-S chip, fabricated on a 3 nm process. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process. Both come from TSMC, but the process node difference is significant: 3 nm versus 6 nm.

The Intel part integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 73.3M per mm². The LX PRO's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no density comparison can be made. The Intel chip is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, meaning it shares system memory. Its memory configuration is entirely system dependent: size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all depend on the host platform.

The LX PRO is a discrete card with dedicated GDDR6 memory. It has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. This yields 432.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth, a figure the Intel part cannot match because it has no dedicated memory at all. Clock speeds for the LX PRO's core are not recorded, while the Intel part runs at a 300 MHz base and 1900 MHz boost.

Shading resources differ by an order of magnitude. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel part has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Pixel rate for the LX PRO is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 30.40 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 60.80 GTexel/s. FP16 performance follows the same pattern: 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for the LX PRO, 3.891 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel.

Power and physical design diverge sharply. The Intel part is an IGP with a 65 W TDP and no slot width, as it occupies no expansion slot. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card, 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide, with a 225 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for the LX PRO is 550 W. The Intel part draws power through the motherboard.

API support differs in Vulkan version. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Display outputs also differ: the Intel part's outputs are motherboard dependent, while the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a straightforward verdict. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is an entry-level integrated GPU whose 733 Steel Nomad score ties it with other low-EU Intel Arc variants. It sits at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs, meaning the vast majority of discrete graphics solutions outperform it. Its 65 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for systems where a separate graphics card is not desired.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark score, so its actual performance cannot be verified against the Intel part in the same test. However, its specification sheet indicates a fundamentally different class of hardware. With 24 GB of GDDR6, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and a 225 W TDP, it is designed for sustained, high-throughput workloads. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it sits at the median of all GPUs, but this ranking is not tied to a specific benchmark score in the database.

For users who need a GPU for basic desktop acceleration, video output, and low power draw, the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is the only option of the two that fits those constraints. For users who need dedicated memory, high compute throughput, and a discrete card, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the only reasonable pick. The data does not support a single winner across all criteria because the two parts target different segments entirely.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It scores identically to the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 24EU at 733 points, is 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M (723 points), and is 2.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M (751 points).

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all system dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and memory clocked at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU has a 65 W TDP and is an IGP. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, is a dual-slot card, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: How much compute throughput does each GPU deliver?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU delivers 1.946 TFLOPS FP32 and 3.891 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database for these two GPUs. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU has a single recorded benchmark: 733 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0, with a 50th percentile ranking.

The closest available comparison comes from the Intel part's nearest rivals. Its 733 score matches the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 24EU exactly. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723, which is 1.4% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751, which is 2.4% higher. These deltas show that the 64EU is not meaningfully faster than much smaller Intel Arc implementations, and it trades blows with decade-old discrete mobile GPUs.

The LX PRO cannot be scored against these parts because the database lacks any benchmark entry for it. What can be quantified is the specification gap. In FP32 compute, the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS is 12.6x the Intel part's 1.946 TFLOPS. In texture rate, 384.0 GTexel/s versus 60.80 GTexel/s is a 6.3x difference. In pixel rate, 192.0 GPixel/s versus 30.40 GPixel/s is a 6.3x difference. Memory bandwidth cannot be compared because the Intel part's bandwidth is system dependent, while the LX PRO has a fixed 432.0 GB/s.

The Intel part's boost clock of 1900 MHz is its only clock figure. The LX PRO lists no core clocks, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Without a benchmark score for the LX PRO, the performance relationship between the two remains inferred from specifications rather than measured.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two GPUs are extensive. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with unknown transistor count and die size.

Shading resources differ by 12x: the Intel part has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs; the LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Compute rates follow: the Intel part delivers 1.946 TFLOPS FP32 and 3.891 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1); the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Pixel rate is 30.40 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 60.80 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Memory is the largest structural difference. The Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part's memory clock is system shared; the LX PRO's memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Power and physical specifications differ completely. The Intel part is an IGP with a 65 W TDP, Ring Bus interface, and motherboard-dependent display outputs. The LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm, with a 225 W TDP, one 16-pin power connector, a suggested PSU of 550 W, a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Release dates are far apart. The Intel part was released on 2024-10-23. The LX PRO's release date is 2026-03-16. Both are listed as Active in production status. The Intel part's predecessor is listed as HD Graphics; the LX PRO has no predecessor. Neither has a successor listed. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded.

API support shows one difference: the Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part's base clock is 300 MHz with a 1900 MHz boost. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clock for its core.