Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC Comparison

Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is an integrated graphics solution from Intel, built on the Meteor Lake chip and using the Xe-LPG architecture. NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is a server-class accelerator from NVIDIA, built on the GB110 chip and using the Blackwell Ultra architecture. The database contains benchmark data for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, while the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores. The recorded data shows a clear performance gap, but the architectural differences explain why these two products target completely different segments.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database is empty for these two products. There are no direct comparison tests recorded between the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile and the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC. The database does contain a single benchmark entry for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369831 points. This is the only recorded measurement for either product.

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 50, which places it at the midpoint of the database distribution. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has a percentile ranking of 100, meaning it sits at the top of the recorded database. Its average benchmark score is 369831 points.

For the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, the database lists four nearest rivals with their average scores and performance deltas. The NVIDIA B200 records an average score of 345482 points, which is 7 percent lower than the B300 SXM6 AC. The NVIDIA H200 NVL records 334891 points, 10.4 percent lower. The AMD Instinct MI300X records 317994 points, 16.3 percent lower. The NVIDIA L40S records 295763 points, 25 percent lower. These deltas show that the B300 SXM6 AC leads its closest competitors by margins ranging from 7 to 25 percent in the recorded OpenCL workload.

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has no comparable data. Without any recorded benchmarks, the database cannot compute a performance delta against the B300 SXM6 AC or any other product. The wins counter shows zero wins for both products in head-to-head tests, which reflects the absence of direct comparison data rather than a tied result.

Architecture Differences

The two products differ fundamentally in nearly every architectural parameter recorded in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a slot width of IGP, meaning it resides inside the Meteor Lake chip. The NVIDIA part is an SXM Module, a standalone accelerator board.

The Intel GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. The NVIDIA GPU has 18944 shading units, 592 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. The shading unit count differs by a factor of 37, the texture unit count by a factor of 18.5, and the raster operation count by a factor of 1.5. These unit counts directly explain the compute throughput disparity.

Clock speeds also diverge. The Intel part runs at a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1750 MHz. The NVIDIA part runs at 1665 MHz base and 2032 MHz boost. The NVIDIA base clock is 5.5 times higher than the Intel base clock, while the boost clock is 1.16 times higher. The Intel GPU's memory clock is listed as "System Shared," meaning it uses whatever system memory is available. The NVIDIA GPU's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory configuration shows the largest gap. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has system shared memory, with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has 288 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192 bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part's bandwidth cannot be quantified from the database because it depends entirely on the host system's memory subsystem.

Compute rates differ by orders of magnitude. The Intel GPU achieves a pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA GPU achieves 48.77 GPixel/s and 1202.9 GTexel/s. The pixel rate is 1.74 times higher on the NVIDIA part, while the texture rate is 21.5 times higher. Floating point performance shows the same pattern: the Intel part delivers 1.792 TFLOPS FP32 and 3.584 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA part delivers 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 76.99 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The FP32 throughput difference is 42.9 times, and the FP16 difference is 21.5 times.

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC includes 592 tensor cores, a feature absent from the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile's recorded specifications. The Intel part has no tensor core count listed. The transistor count also differs: the NVIDIA chip contains 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die with a transistor density of 127.8 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel part has no transistor count, die size, or density recorded.

Power consumption reflects the performance gap. The Intel GPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the NVIDIA GPU has a TDP of 1100 W. The suggested power supply for the NVIDIA part is 1500 W. The Intel part uses a ring bus interface and has display outputs described as portable device dependent. The NVIDIA part uses PCIe 6.0 x16 and has no display outputs. API support also differs: the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA part lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, reflecting its server-oriented design without graphics API compatibility.

Release dates place these products roughly two years apart. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile released on December 13, 2023. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC released on September 10, 2025. The Intel part's predecessor is listed as HD Graphics-M, while the NVIDIA part's predecessor is Server Hopper and its successor is Server Rubin. Both products are currently listed as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile wins in scenarios that prioritize integration and power efficiency. Its 65 W TDP fits within mobile system constraints, and its IGP form factor requires no separate board space. The system shared memory design means there is no dedicated VRAM allocation, which reduces component cost and complexity in a laptop chassis. The display outputs, described as portable device dependent, allow it to drive built-in panels and external displays through the host device. Its API support for DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 makes it suitable for conventional graphics workloads on mobile platforms.

The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC wins in raw compute performance. Its 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 throughput, 8.19 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 288 GB HBM3e capacity provide the resources needed for large-scale server workloads. The 592 tensor cores enable accelerated matrix operations, which the database records as a differentiator from the Intel part. The 8192 bit memory bus and 8 Gbps effective clock yield bandwidth that no integrated solution can approach. Its percentile ranking of 100 confirms that the recorded database places it above all other products.

The use-case split follows the architectural data. The Intel part addresses the mobile integrated segment, where power draw, physical footprint, and display output matter. The NVIDIA part addresses the server accelerator segment, where compute density, memory capacity, and throughput dominate. Neither product competes in the other's segment, and the database records no crossover benchmarks.

The benchmark data for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC shows its standing among server accelerators. The 7 percent lead over the B200, 10.4 percent lead over the H200 NVL, 16.3 percent lead over the MI300X, and 25 percent lead over the L40S position it as the top performer in its recorded peer group. The Intel part has no recorded peers, so no similar comparison is possible.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark score does the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC achieve?

A: The database records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 369831 points for the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC. This is the only benchmark entry for either product in the database.

Q: How does the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The B300 SXM6 AC leads the NVIDIA B200 by 7 percent, the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 10.4 percent, the AMD Instinct MI300X by 16.3 percent, and the NVIDIA L40S by 25 percent, based on average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile uses system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has 288 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192 bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What power draw does each product have?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has a TDP of 65 W. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC has a TDP of 1100 W and a suggested power supply of 1500 W.

Q: What compute performance does each product deliver?

A: The Intel part delivers 1.792 TFLOPS FP32 and 3.584 TFLOPS FP16. The NVIDIA part delivers 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 and 76.99 TFLOPS FP16.

Q: What is the release date for each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile released on December 13, 2023. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC released on September 10, 2025.

The Verdict

The database shows two products with no recorded head-to-head results and no common benchmark data. The NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC holds a benchmark score of 369831 points and a 100th percentile ranking. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile holds no benchmark score and a 50th percentile ranking. The architectural data explains this divergence completely.

For server compute workloads, the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC is the clear choice. Its 76.99 TFLOPS FP32, 8.19 TB/s memory bandwidth, 288 GB HBM3e capacity, and 592 tensor cores deliver the highest recorded performance in its peer group. The 7 to 25 percent margins over its nearest rivals confirm its position at the top of the database distribution. The 1100 W TDP and SXM module form factor are appropriate for data center installations where power and space are available.

For mobile integrated graphics, the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile serves a different purpose. Its 65 W TDP, IGP slot width, and system shared memory fit within laptop power and thermal envelopes. The 512 shading units and 1.792 TFLOPS FP32 provide basic rendering capability for portable devices. The display output support for portable device dependent configurations makes it functional in its intended segment.

The choice between these products is determined by the deployment context, not by direct performance comparison. The database records no benchmark where both products participated, and the architectural parameters place them in separate market segments. The Intel part has no nearest rivals recorded, while the NVIDIA part competes exclusively with other server accelerators. Any selection should be based on the target platform: mobile systems with integrated graphics requirements point to the Intel part, server systems with maximum compute throughput point to the NVIDIA part. The recorded data supports only this segmented interpretation.