Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Neither product has recorded benchmark scores or an average benchmark score in the database. Both GPUs hold a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs in the database, and there are no nearest rival entries to provide comparative performance context. This absence of recorded data means that a statistical comparison of their real-world performance cannot be established from the available information.

What the data does reveal, however, is the theoretical compute ceiling of each design. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is rated for 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is rated for 3.942 TFLOPS. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers a computed 6.2 times higher FP32 throughput than the Intel part, a substantial gap that points to a very different performance class. In texture rate, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO reaches 384.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s for the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, a 3.1 times advantage. Pixel throughput similarly favors the Lisuan Tech LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 52.80 GPixel/s, which is roughly 3.6 times higher.

These figures are theoretical maximums derived from clock speeds and shader counts, not measured application performance. Still, the scale of the differences indicates that the two products are not competing in the same performance segment. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with system-shared memory, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete dual-slot card with dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 memory. The memory bandwidth differential alone is significant: the Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides 432.0 GB/s, while the Intel part's bandwidth is listed as system dependent, meaning it varies with the host platform's memory configuration. Any direct benchmark comparison would be expected to show the Lisuan Tech LX PRO with a considerable lead across most GPU-bound workloads, but the database does not currently include such measurements.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is rated at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is rated at 3.942 TFLOPS FP32. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers approximately 6.2 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: What are the memory configurations of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth at a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: How do their pixel and texture rates compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile delivers 52.80 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is roughly 3.6 times higher in pixel rate and 3.1 times higher in texture rate.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a TDP of 65 W and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors listed. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports newer graphics APIs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.3. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4. Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What are the physical sizes of the two products?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has no listed dimensions because it is an IGP integrated into a mobile platform. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is built on the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Meteor Lake chip, and represents Intel's Arc Graphics-M generation for mobile platforms. Its process node is 10 nm, fabricated at Intel's own foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, in contrast, uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The manufacturing difference places the Lisuan Tech LX PRO on a more advanced process node, which typically enables higher transistor density and better power efficiency per unit of compute.

The compute resources diverge sharply. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile contains 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO contains 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. That is roughly 6.9 times more shading units, 3.4 times more TMUs, and 4 times more ROPs in the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Neither product lists dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores in the database, so an architectural comparison of those features is not possible.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Intel part relies on system-shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and its bandwidth is dependent on the host system's memory subsystem. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with a fixed 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This dedicated memory arrangement gives the Lisuan Tech LX PRO a predictable and much higher memory throughput, which is critical for texture-heavy workloads and larger framebuffers.

Bus interfaces also differ. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses a Ring Bus interface, consistent with its integrated nature. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16, a standard discrete card interface that allows direct communication with the host processor over a high-bandwidth slot.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show clear divergence in nearly every measurable category. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed in the database, but its memory clock is specified at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared, again reflecting its dependence on host memory.

The shading unit count is 896 for the Intel part versus 6144 for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. TMU counts are 56 versus 192, and ROP counts are 24 versus 96. FP32 performance is 3.942 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rates are 52.80 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 123.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power consumption differs by a factor of roughly 3.5: the Intel part is rated at 65 W TDP, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is rated at 225 W TDP. The Intel part is an IGP with no slot width or power connectors, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has physical dimensions of 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm, while the Intel part has no dimensions listed.

Display outputs also differ. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop implementation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. API support shows a minor difference: the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Release dates also differ. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile was released on 2023-12-13, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. The Intel part lists a predecessor, HD Graphics-M, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no predecessor listed. Neither product has a successor listed. The Intel part's manufacturer is Intel, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's manufacturer is listed as Unknown. The foundry for the Intel part is Intel, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is fabricated at TSMC.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile wins in power efficiency. Its 65 W TDP is substantially lower than the 225 W TDP of the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, making it suitable for mobile platforms where thermal and power budgets are constrained. The Intel part also carries a higher Vulkan API version at 1.4, compared to Vulkan 1.3 for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Its integrated nature means it requires no additional slot space, no power connectors, and no separate PSU recommendation, which simplifies system integration in portable devices.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins decisively in raw compute specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 6.2 times higher than the Intel part's 3.942 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) is similarly dominant. Texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s, and pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 52.80 GPixel/s. The dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a fixed, high-bandwidth memory pool that the Intel part cannot match due to its system-shared, bandwidth-dependent design.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO also wins on API feature level with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, which includes features not available in the DirectX 12 (12_1) level supported by the Intel part. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a dedicated high-bandwidth connection to the host system, whereas the Intel part uses a Ring Bus interface integrated into the mobile chip.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor setups, while the Intel part's display outputs are dependent on the portable device implementation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO's larger shading unit count, TMU count, and ROP count all point to higher fill rates and more parallel compute capacity for demanding workloads.

The Verdict

The data indicates two products with different intended roles. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is an integrated GPU for mobile devices, released in 2023, with modest compute resources, a 65 W TDP, and system-shared memory. It supports Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12 (12_1), and its performance ceiling is defined by the host platform's memory bandwidth.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card released in 2026, with a 225 W TDP, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a 16-pin power connector. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, 6144 shading units, and more than six times the FP32 compute of the Intel part. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate support and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs position it for desktop use cases requiring high throughput and multi-display configurations.

The choice between these two products depends entirely on the system form factor and workload requirements. For a mobile platform where power draw and physical space are limited, the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is the only viable option given its integrated design. For a desktop system with the power delivery and physical space to accommodate a 225 W dual-slot card, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides substantially higher theoretical compute, dedicated memory, and higher bandwidth. The absence of benchmark scores in the database prevents a performance-per-watt or real-world application comparison, but the specification sheet alone establishes the Lisuan Tech LX PRO as the higher-performing product in raw GPU metrics.