Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy opposite ends of the graphics hardware spectrum. The former is an integrated processor graphics solution built for mobility and low power consumption, while the latter is a high-end discrete add-in board designed for maximum throughput. The recorded data shows a fundamental separation in purpose, performance envelope, and physical implementation.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor, or IGP, which means it is designed to share system memory and operate within the thermal limits of a slim laptop chassis. Its recorded power target is 65 W, and it uses a Ring Bus interface for communication with the rest of the processor package. The data indicates this chip wins in scenarios where low power draw and compact physical integration are the primary concerns. It has no power connectors listed, a slot width of IGP, and display outputs described as Portable Device Dependent. These characteristics point to a component that is permanently attached to the motherboard and relies on the host system for its electrical and cooling infrastructure.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every performance-oriented category in the database. Its shading unit count is 8960 versus 896 for the Intel part, a 10 to 1 ratio. The texture mapping unit count is 280 versus 56, and the render output unit count is 96 versus 24. The NVIDIA chip also carries dedicated hardware in the form of 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, while the Intel chip lists no such units. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot solution measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. Its memory subsystem is completely separate from the host system, with 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus.

The split between the two parts is therefore clear. The Intel Arc 112EU Mobile is for systems where space and power are limited and the graphics load is modest. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is for systems that can accommodate a large, power-hungry expansion card and demand the highest possible frame rates and compute throughput. There are no shared use cases in the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on entirely different fabrication processes and microarchitectures. The Intel chip, part of the Meteor Lake generation, uses the Xe-LPG architecture and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The NVIDIA chip uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference alone accounts for substantial disparities in transistor density and power efficiency, although the database does not list transistor counts for the Intel part.

The physical scale of the NVIDIA chip is documented. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. No die size or transistor data is provided for the Intel chip, making a direct scaling comparison impossible from the available records. The clock behavior also differs sharply. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The NVIDIA part has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The NVIDIA base clock is nearly identical to the Intel boost clock, and the NVIDIA boost clock sits 252 MHz above it.

Memory architecture is the most pronounced difference. The Intel Arc 112EU Mobile uses System Shared memory, meaning its capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host laptop. The database lists its memory bandwidth as System Dependent, so no fixed figure can be assigned. The NVIDIA card carries a self-contained memory system: 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 28 Gbps. This dedicated high-bandwidth memory is a core reason for the NVIDIA card's dominance in memory-intensive workloads, as it does not compete with the CPU for access to system DRAM.

Compute resource counts show the same pattern. The Intel chip provides 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The NVIDIA chip provides 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The theoretical fill rates scale accordingly. The Intel pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s. Floating point throughput shows a similar gap. The Intel FP32 rate is 3.942 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA FP32 rate is 43.94 TFLOPS. The Intel FP16 rate is 7.885 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA FP16 rate is 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA part does not halve its throughput when switching to FP16, whereas the Intel part doubles its rate from the FP32 figure.

API support is roughly comparable. Both parts list Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part is rated for DirectX 12 (12_1), while the NVIDIA part is rated for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), a higher feature level. The NVIDIA card also lists specific display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Intel part lists Portable Device Dependent outputs, reflecting its role in a laptop where the panel connections are determined by the system builder.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: 6269.5 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has no benchmark scores listed, and the head-to-head benchmark array between the two is empty. The database also lists zero wins for each part in direct comparison, which is consistent with the absence of shared benchmark entries.

The NVIDIA score places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 6270. The nearest rivals in the recorded data are instructive. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 posts an average score of 6270, which is a delta of 0 percent, meaning the two cards perform identically in this metric. The AMD FirePro W600 posts an average score of 6223, which puts it 0.8 percent behind the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 posts an average score of 6282, which is 0.2 percent ahead. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 posts an average score of 6327, which is 0.9 percent ahead. These deltas are small, all within roughly 1 percent of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average score.

The absence of a benchmark score for the Intel part means no quantitative comparison can be made between the two chips in the recorded data. The percentile ranking for the Intel part is 50, which is above the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile, but this ranking is not tied to any measured score. The Intel average benchmark score is recorded as 0, which indicates a lack of tested data rather than a literal score of zero. The performance gap must therefore be inferred from the architectural and specification differences: a 10x difference in shading units, a 896.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth versus a system-dependent shared pool, and a 350 W power envelope versus 65 W.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel part, an average benchmark score of 0, and zero wins in head-to-head comparisons. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one recorded score of 6269.5 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two parts?

A: The NVIDIA card has a fixed memory system with 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus delivering 896.0 GB/s. The Intel part uses System Shared memory with bandwidth listed as System Dependent, so no fixed figure exists in the database.

Q: Which part has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a boost clock of 2452 MHz, which is 252 MHz higher than the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile's boost clock of 2200 MHz. The NVIDIA base clock of 2295 MHz is 95 MHz below the Intel boost clock.

Q: What is the recorded power draw for each part?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is listed with a TDP of 65 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is listed with a TDP of 350 W.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER averages 6270 in the recorded benchmark. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches it at 0 percent delta, the Quadro K620 is 0.2 percent ahead, the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8 percent behind, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9 percent ahead.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel chip is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The NVIDIA chip is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Does the Intel part have dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: The database lists no RT cores and no tensor cores for the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile. The NVIDIA card lists 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one conclusion for raw performance: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is in a different class entirely. Its 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and 896.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth place it far beyond the Intel integrated solution. The NVIDIA card's single benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while placing it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, is still a measurable result. The Intel part has no recorded measurement at all.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is defined by its integration. It uses a 10 nm process, operates at 65 W, and shares system memory. Its 896 shading units and 3.942 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are appropriate for a component that must coexist with a CPU in a laptop. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs reflects its position in the broader database distribution, but this ranking is not backed by any benchmark score in the records. The absence of a score means the ranking cannot be interpreted as evidence of competitive performance.

For a system builder or user whose priority is a small, low-power, integrated graphics solution, the Intel part is the only option among the two that fits that description. It requires no power connectors, occupies no expansion slot, and uses whatever memory the host system provides. For anyone whose priority is maximum graphics throughput, dedicated memory, and modern API feature support, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice. It is a dual-slot, 350 W, 304 mm expansion card with a 1x 16-pin power connector and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. It also carries a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

The two parts do not compete for the same buyer. The data shows no shared benchmark entries and no head-to-head results, and the architectural specifications are so divergent that a direct performance comparison is not meaningful. The Intel part belongs in a mobile processor package, and the NVIDIA part belongs in a desktop tower with adequate power delivery and cooling. The database records confirm that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly 11 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, and its only recorded benchmark score positions it within 1 percent of several established desktop GPUs. The Intel part, with no recorded scores, cannot be positioned in the same way. The choice between them is not a choice between two similar products; it is a choice between an integrated mobile solution and a high-end discrete graphics card.