Intel Arc B570 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison scenario. The Intel Arc B570 has a full set of ten benchmark results across multiple DirectX versions, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means no direct head-to-head measurements exist between these two products. This absence of data for the LX ULTRA is itself a significant finding, as it prevents any direct numerical comparison on identical workloads.

What the database does show is the Arc B570's position among its nearest rivals. The Arc B570 delivers an average benchmark score of 20,556 across all recorded tests. Its closest competitor, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20,534, placing the Arc B570 a marginal 0.1% ahead. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582, which puts it 0.1% ahead of the B570. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662, meaning the B570 trails it by 0.5%, while the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480, with the B570 leading by 0.4%. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the Arc B570 sits in a tightly clustered performance band.

The Arc B570's individual benchmark scores reveal its workload characteristics. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,649. Geekbench OpenCL returns 83,514, while Geekbench Vulkan reaches 96,844. The Passmark suite shows a wide spread: DirectX 9 scores 164, DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 118, and DirectX 12 scores 72. The Passmark G3D score is 14,195, with GPU compute at 7,281 and G2D at 661. The percentile ranking against all GPUs is 65, meaning the Arc B570 outperforms roughly two-thirds of the GPUs in the database.

The LX ULTRA's lack of benchmark data means its performance characteristics must be inferred from its architectural specifications rather than measured results. The database records an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50, which is the default placement for entries without recorded measurements. No nearest rivals are listed for the LX ULTRA, further confirming the absence of comparative data.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmark results, the win analysis shifts to specification-based advantages. Each product demonstrates clear strengths in different areas based on the recorded hardware data.

The Intel Arc B570 wins on process technology and transistor density. It uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC, while the LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process from the same foundry. The B570 packs 19,600 million transistors into a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, so no density figure exists. The B570 also carries a higher pixel rate at 200.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX ULTRA.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins decisively on raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, more than double the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS. FP16 follows the same pattern: 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX ULTRA versus 23.04 TFLOPS for the B570. The LX ULTRA also has more shading units at 6,144 versus 2,304, more texture mapping units at 192 versus 144, and more ROPs at 96 versus 80. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s exceeds the B570's 360.0 GTexel/s.

Memory capacity and bandwidth favor the LX ULTRA. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc B570 provides 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s. The LX ULTRA also uses a wider PCIe interface at PCIe 4.0 x16, compared to the B570's PCIe 4.0 x8.

The Arc B570 counters with a higher memory clock at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) versus the LX ULTRA's 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The B570 also lists 18 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded RT core count. API support differs slightly: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6, but the B570 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Display outputs diverge significantly. The B570 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX ULTRA offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a with no HDMI. The B570's power draw is lower at 150 W TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU, versus the LX ULTRA's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is substantial. The Intel Arc B570 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on the BMG-G21 chip, part of the Battlemage generation within the Arc 5 series. It is fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process and contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The LX ULTRA uses a completely different architecture called TrueGPU, built on the 7G105 chip from the 7G100 generation. Its process node is 6 nm from TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Shader configuration differs markedly. The B570 has 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The B570 includes 18 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA lists no RT cores. Neither product records tensor cores.

Clock behavior shows another contrast. The Arc B570 has a fixed clock profile with both base and boost at 2500 MHz. The LX ULTRA records no base or boost clock values, leaving its operating frequency unspecified. Memory clocks are close: the B570 runs at 2375 MHz for 19 Gbps effective, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2250 MHz for 18 Gbps effective.

The bus interface differs as well. The B570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This gives the LX ULTRA twice the PCIe lane count for host communication, which can matter for data transfer-heavy workloads.

Physical dimensions are similar. The B570 measures 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Both are dual-slot cards. Power delivery uses different connectors: the B570 uses a single 8-pin connector, while the LX ULTRA uses a single 16-pin connector.

The B570 is a successor to Intel's Alchemist generation, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded predecessor. Release timing differs, with the B570 dated 2025-01-15 and the LX ULTRA dated 2026-03-16. The B570 has a recorded launch MSRP of 219 USD, while the LX ULTRA has no launch price in the database.

The Verdict

The data presents a split decision based on what each product prioritizes. For measured performance, the Intel Arc B570 is the only product with actual benchmark results. Its 65th percentile standing and average score of 20,556 place it among a cluster of GPUs that includes the RTX 3070 Mobile, Arc A750, Quadro M4000M, and R9 M390X, all within 0.5% of each other. The B570's strongest recorded result is Geekbench Vulkan at 96,844, followed by OpenCL at 83,514. Its DirectX 11 score of 118 and DirectX 9 score of 164 show relative strength in legacy APIs compared to its DirectX 10 score of 65 and DirectX 12 score of 72.

For raw specification-driven compute, the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA holds the advantage on paper. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than double the B570's 11.52 TFLOPS. Its 24 GB memory capacity, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 6,144 shading units suggest a card designed for high-density compute workloads or large dataset handling. The lack of any recorded benchmark results, however, means these specifications remain unverified in practice.

The choice depends on what the data can support. Users who require verified performance from the database should consider the Arc B570, as it has ten recorded benchmark scores and a clear percentile ranking. Users who prioritize the LX ULTRA's higher compute specifications, larger memory pool, and wider PCIe interface must accept that no measured data exists to confirm real-world behavior. The B570 also offers ray tracing cores, Vulkan 1.4 support, and HDMI output, while the LX ULTRA offers only DisplayPort outputs and Vulkan 1.3.

The Arc B570's lower TDP of 150 W and suggested 450 W PSU make it a lower-power option. The LX ULTRA's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a more demanding power profile. The B570's launch MSRP of 219 USD provides a reference point, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded price.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX ULTRA has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile?

A: The Arc B570 scores 20,556 on average, while the RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534. The Arc B570 is 0.1% ahead.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc B570 records 11.52 TFLOPS, making the LX ULTRA more than double the B570's FP32 throughput.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Intel Arc B570 uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports the newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc B570 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a 150 W TDP and a suggested 450 W PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W PSU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B570 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Chip | BMG-G21 | 7G105 |

| Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 272 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Memory Size | 10 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 160 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 380.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Shading Units | 2304 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 144 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 18 | Not recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 200.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 360.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.52 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Base Clock | 2500 MHz | Not recorded |

| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz | Not recorded |

| Length | 272 mm | 268 mm |

| Height | 115 mm | 112 mm |

| Width | Not recorded | 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-01-15 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | Alchemist | Not recorded |

| Launch MSRP | 219 USD | Not recorded |

| Benchmark Scores | 10 recorded tests | None recorded |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 65 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 20556 | 0 |