Intel Arc B570 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database shows no benchmark entries for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The Intel Arc B570 uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc B570 delivers 11.52 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What process nodes do the two GPUs use?

A: The Intel Arc B570 is built on TSMC's 5 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses TSMC's 6 nm process.

Q: What is the power draw of each card?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B570 uses the BMG-G21 chip based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation. It is built on a 5 nm TSMC process and packs 19,600 million transistors into a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The architecture includes 18 dedicated RT cores, and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process, but the database does not list transistor count, die size, or transistor density. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, so it matches the Intel card on DirectX and OpenGL but trails by one minor Vulkan version.

Both cards are dual-slot designs with a single 8-pin power connector. The Intel Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Display outputs differ: the Intel card offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Lisuan card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and no HDMI.

The B570 has a fixed boost clock of 2500 MHz with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Lisuan card also has no listed RT core count, whereas the Intel card explicitly includes 18 RT cores.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B570 has the only recorded benchmark data. Its strongest result appears in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 96844, and it also posts 83514 in Geekbench OpenCL. In Passmark tests, the B570 scores 14195 in G3D, 7281 in GPU Compute, 661 in G2D, 164 in DirectX 9, 118 in DirectX 11, 72 in DirectX 12, and 65 in DirectX 10. For 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2649.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries in the database. This means no direct head-to-head wins can be assigned to either card from measured results. The winsA and winsB counts are both zero.

However, the raw specification sheet favors the LX 7G100 in several compute categories. It delivers more than double the FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 11.52 TFLOPS, and its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) compares to 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) on the B570. The Lisuan card also has more shading units (6144 versus 2304), more TMUs (192 versus 144), more ROPs (96 versus 80), and a higher texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 360.0 GTexel/s.

Memory capacity and bandwidth also favor the Lisuan card: 12 GB versus 10 GB, and 432.0 GB/s versus 380.0 GB/s. The pixel rate slightly favors the Intel card at 200.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, despite the Lisuan card having more ROPs.

The Intel Arc B570 is the only one of the two with a launch MSRP, listed at 219 USD. The Lisuan card has no launch MSRP in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B570 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) | 7G100 |

| Chip | BMG-G21 | 7G106 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | unknown |

| Die size | 272 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 72.1M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 2500 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 2500 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 2375 MHz 19 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 10 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus | 160 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 380.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2304 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 144 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT cores | 18 | null |

| Pixel rate | 200.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 360.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.52 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 272 mm 10.7 inches | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | 115 mm 4.5 inches | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | null | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release date | 2025-01-15 | 2026-06-17 |

| Launch MSRP | 219 USD | null |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards, and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no individual benchmark scores at all. Consequently, every comparison must come from the specification sheet rather than measured performance.

The most striking difference is compute throughput. The LX 7G100 rates 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is roughly 2.13 times the B570's 11.52 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Lisuan card's 49.15 TFLOPS is about 2.13 times the B570's 23.04 TFLOPS. These are large gaps that suggest the Lisuan card is designed for workloads where raw shader math dominates.

Memory bandwidth also favors the Lisuan card. At 432.0 GB/s, it exceeds the B570's 380.0 GB/s by 52.0 GB/s. The wider 192-bit bus and 12 GB capacity give it additional headroom for large textures and datasets, while the B570 is limited to 10 GB on a 160-bit bus.

The texture rate is another area where the Lisuan card leads: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 360.0 GTexel/s. The B570 fights back with a higher pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. That pixel rate edge is modest, roughly 4% higher, and it comes from the B570's higher clock speed combined with fewer ROPs.

The B570 also has an edge in interface modernity. It supports Vulkan 1.4, DisplayPort 2.1, and includes HDMI 2.1. The Lisuan card tops out at Vulkan 1.3 and DisplayPort 1.4a, with no HDMI output. For users with HDMI-only monitors, the B570 is the only one of the two that connects directly.

Power efficiency clearly favors the B570. It draws 150 W TDP and suggests a 450 W PSU, while the Lisuan card draws 225 W TDP and suggests a 550 W PSU. The B570 delivers its 11.52 TFLOPS at 150 W, while the Lisuan card delivers 24.58 TFLOPS at 225 W. Per watt, the B570 produces roughly 76.8 GFLOPS per watt, while the Lisuan card produces roughly 109.2 GFLOPS per watt, so the Lisuan card is actually more efficient in raw FP32 per watt despite its higher absolute draw.

Physical dimensions differ as well. The B570 measures 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Lisuan card is longer at 294 mm and taller at 120 mm, with a width of 49 mm. The B570's width is not listed. The Lisuan card is 22 mm longer and 5 mm taller, which matters in compact cases.

The Verdict

The Intel Arc B570 is the only card here with measured performance data. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (0.1% behind), the Intel Arc A750 at 20582 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (0.5% ahead). These deltas are tiny, within a fraction of a percent, so the B570 sits in a dense cluster of comparable performers.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark data, no launch MSRP, and no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder based on zero scores. Anyone choosing this card does so on specifications alone.

The specification sheet points to two very different design goals. The B570 is a 150 W card with a 272 mm length, PCIe 4.0 x8, DisplayPort 2.1, and HDMI 2.1. It is compact, efficient, and modern in its display output. The LX 7G100 is a 225 W card with a 294 mm length, PCIe 4.0 x16, and DisplayPort 1.4a only. It has more memory, more bandwidth, and more than double the FP32 and FP16 throughput.

For workloads that depend on raw compute, the LX 7G100 is the stronger choice on paper. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 12 GB memory give it a clear specification advantage. The B570 cannot match those numbers.

For users who prioritize measured results, the B570 is the only card with verified scores. Its 65th percentile ranking and near-parity with the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750 give it a known performance envelope. The LX 7G100 offers no such assurance.

The B570 also wins on efficiency and connectivity. It draws 75 W less, fits in a shorter case, supports Vulkan 1.4, and includes HDMI 2.1. The LX 7G100 requires a stronger PSU and only offers DisplayPort outputs.

The decision depends on whether the buyer trusts the LX 7G100's specifications or requires the B570's recorded results. The data does not resolve that question, because no head-to-head benchmarks exist. A builder targeting compute-heavy tasks with an eye on the LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS should treat that figure as an unverified claim. A builder who wants a known performer in the 65th percentile with modern display outputs should choose the B570.