Intel Arc B370 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a single benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Arc B370 scores 1184 points. This places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating that it outperforms only a small fraction of recorded graphics hardware. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark entries in the database, so its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile ranking sits at 50. Direct numerical comparison between the two cards is therefore limited to the Arc B370's result against its nearest rivals, rather than against the LX MAX directly.

The Arc B370's score of 1184 sits within a tight cluster of comparable GPUs. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 averages 1186, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B370. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 averages 1190, a 0.5% advantage. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M averages 1192, a 0.7% edge. On the opposite side, the AMD FirePro M2000 averages 1168, which is 1.4% lower than the Intel part. These deltas are all within a narrow band of roughly two percentage points, so the Arc B370 effectively trades positions with these older discrete GPUs depending on the specific workload. The closest competitor, the Mobility Radeon HD 5570, is essentially tied with the Arc B370 in this benchmark.

Because the LX MAX lacks any recorded scores, there are no head-to-head benchmark entries, no wins for either product, and no delta percentages to report. The absence of data for the LX MAX means the database cannot confirm its performance level relative to the Arc B370 or any other GPU. The LX MAX does carry a 50th percentile placement, but with an average score of zero, this percentile appears to reflect its position in the database rather than a measured performance result.

The Verdict

From the available data, the Intel Arc B370 is the only one of the two products with a recorded performance measurement. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile overall, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.7% above or 1.4% below its result. This indicates that the Arc B370 delivers performance comparable to a specific generation of older discrete GPUs, specifically the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and AMD FirePro M2000. The LX MAX has no benchmark data, so no performance verdict can be derived from the database. Users who require a measured benchmark result would select the Arc B370, as the LX MAX offers no recorded scores to evaluate. The Arc B370 also consumes 25 W with no power connectors and an integrated form factor, while the LX MAX draws 225 W and requires a 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. Those power and physical characteristics are documented, but they do not alter the fact that only one product has a measurable performance profile in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Arc B370's score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The Intel Arc B370 records a score of 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% faster with a score of 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% faster with 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% faster with 1192. The AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% slower with 1168.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark entries in the database, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What percentile does the Intel Arc B370 hold among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: What percentile does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX hold among all GPUs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX holds the 50th percentile among all GPUs, despite having an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: Which product has a higher pixel rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc B370 has a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s.

Specification Differences

The Intel Arc B370 and Lisuan Tech LX MAX differ across nearly every recorded specification. The Arc B370 uses a 3 nm process node from Intel, while the LX MAX uses a 6 nm node from TSMC. The Arc B370 is built on the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip, whereas the LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip. The Arc B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation; the LX MAX belongs to the 7G100 generation.

Clock speeds diverge sharply. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clock, but its memory clock is listed at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. Memory configurations differ completely: the Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system shared type, bus width, and system dependent bandwidth, while the LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources also differ. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores recorded. Pixel rate for the Arc B370 is 48.00 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX MAX. Texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc B370 and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX MAX. FP16 throughput is 12.29 TFLOPS for the Arc B370 and 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX MAX, both listed with a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications separate the two as well. The Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W, an integrated form factor, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, a dual-slot form factor, one 16-pin power connector, a suggested PSU of 550 W, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. Display outputs differ: the Arc B370 is described as portable device dependent, while the LX MAX offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions are recorded only for the LX MAX: 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Release dates also differ, with the Arc B370 dated earlier and the LX MAX dated later in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two products represent fundamentally different design approaches. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm Intel process, targeting an integrated graphics role with a 25 W TDP and no separate power delivery. Its memory interface relies entirely on system shared memory, meaning bandwidth is dependent on the host platform. The LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process with dedicated 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, delivering a fixed 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX is a discrete, dual-slot card requiring external power and a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot.

The Arc B370 includes 10 ray tracing cores, while the LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but they differ in Vulkan support: the Arc B370 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The Arc B370's integrated nature means its display outputs are portable device dependent, while the LX MAX provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX MAX's shading unit count of 6144 is 4.8 times the Arc B370's 1280, and its texture mapping unit count of 192 is 4.8 times the Arc B370's 40. ROP count is 96 versus 20, a 4.8 times difference as well. These ratios align with the differences in FP32 and FP16 throughput, where the LX MAX delivers roughly four times the compute throughput of the Arc B370. The LX MAX's pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is exactly four times the Arc B370's 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is exactly four times the Arc B370's 96.00 GTexel/s. The process node difference, 3 nm versus 6 nm, does not translate into a performance advantage for the Arc B370 in the recorded specifications, as the LX MAX holds the higher throughput figures across all compute, pixel, and texture metrics.