Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a single benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Arc B370 achieves a score of 1184. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries in the database, which limits direct comparison to a single data point. The Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, meaning 95% of recorded graphics processors score higher in this workload.

Against its nearest rivals, the Arc B370's score of 1184 places it within a narrow performance band. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 averages 1186, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B370's result. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 records an average of 1190, a 0.5% advantage. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M posts 1192, leading the Arc B370 by 0.7%. Conversely, the Arc B370 outperforms the AMD FirePro M2000, which averages 1168, by 1.4%. These deltas are all within a few percentage points, indicating that the Arc B370's raw DX12 throughput lands in a cluster of older discrete and mobile parts.

Because the Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores, no head-to-head delta can be computed. The wins tally in the database shows zero wins for either product. The data cannot confirm that the Arc Pro B370 is faster or slower in any specific test; it simply lacks measurement entries. The Arc B370's single score, however, provides a reference point for its own performance class: roughly equivalent to a mid-2010s desktop GPU in this particular DX12 workload, despite being a modern integrated part.

Architecture Differences

Both products share the same underlying silicon. The chip is Panther Lake, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The architecture is Xe3-LPG for both. The Arc B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, while the Arc Pro B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The generation labels differ, but the hardware specifications are identical across every measured field.

The Arc Pro B370 lists a predecessor: HD Graphics-WM. The Arc B370 has no predecessor entry. This suggests the Pro variant is positioned as a successor to an earlier integrated graphics line, whereas the standard Arc B370 is presented without a direct prior model in the database. No successor is listed for either product.

The process node is 3 nm for both, and the foundry is Intel for both. Transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown for both parts, so no comparison of physical implementation is possible from the data. The clock behavior matches exactly: a 300 MHz base clock and a 2400 MHz boost clock. Memory is System Shared in size, type, and bus width for both, with bandwidth listed as System Dependent. This means both rely on the host system's memory subsystem rather than dedicated VRAM.

The compute configuration is identical. Each has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. No tensor core count is listed for either. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s for both, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s for both. FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS for both, and FP16 throughput is 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio for both. The thermal design power is 25 W for each, and both are integrated graphics processors (IGP) with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The bus interface is IGP for both, and display outputs are Portable Device Dependent for both.

API support is identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both products are marked Active in production status, and both share the release date of 2026-01-26. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

The only architectural distinction that can be drawn from the facts is the generation label (Arc Graphics-M versus Arc Graphics-WM) and the predecessor relationship. The Pro variant's predecessor, HD Graphics-WM, indicates an intended lineage that the non-Pro part lacks in the record. Everything else about the silicon, from the chip to the clocks to the memory interface, is numerically identical.

The Verdict

The data presents an unusual case: two products with identical specifications, one of which has a single benchmark score and the other has none. For the Arc B370, the recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile overall. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.4% of its score, which means the Arc B370 delivers performance comparable to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and AMD FirePro M2000 in this specific test. The Pro variant cannot be ranked because it has no measurements.

For a user choosing between these two, the deciding factor cannot be performance, because the database shows no performance difference. The specifications are identical down to the TDP, clock speeds, memory configuration, and API support. The Arc Pro B370's predecessor entry (HD Graphics-WM) and its Arc Graphics-WM generation label are the only distinguishing facts. The Arc B370's Arc Graphics-M generation label and its absence of a predecessor are the corresponding differences.

The Arc B370 has demonstrated performance data; the Arc Pro B370 does not. If a benchmark result is required for validation, the Arc B370 is the only one of the two with a recorded score. If the Pro designation and the predecessor lineage matter for platform or driver targeting, the Arc Pro B370 carries those markers. From a pure specification standpoint, neither offers any measurable advantage over the other. The choice rests entirely on the generation label and the predecessor record, as the silicon, clocks, memory, and feature set are the same.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in only three recorded fields: generation, predecessor, and benchmark data.

• Generation: Intel Arc B370 is listed under Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake). Intel Arc Pro B370 is listed under Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake).
• Predecessor: Intel Arc B370 has no predecessor entry. Intel Arc Pro B370 lists HD Graphics-WM as its predecessor.
• Benchmark data: Intel Arc B370 has one recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, a percentile of 5, an average benchmark score of 1184, and four nearest rivals. Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks, a percentile of 50, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals.

All other specification fields match exactly: chip (Panther Lake), architecture (Xe3-LPG), process node (3 nm), foundry (Intel), base clock (300 MHz), boost clock (2400 MHz), memory (System Shared in size, type, and bus width; System Dependent bandwidth), shading units (1280), TMUs (40), ROPs (20), RT cores (10), pixel rate (48.00 GPixel/s), texture rate (96.00 GTexel/s), FP32 (6.144 TFLOPS), FP16 (12.29 TFLOPS at 2:1), TDP (25 W), slot width (IGP), power connectors (None), bus interface (IGP), display outputs (Portable Device Dependent), DirectX (12 Ultimate, 12_2), OpenGL (4.6), Vulkan (1.4), production status (Active), and release date (2026-01-26). Neither has a launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score, the Intel Arc B370 or the Intel Arc Pro B370?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no comparison can be made.

Q: Are the clock speeds different between the two cards?

A: No. Both have a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz.

Q: What is the process node for both products?

A: Both are built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry.

Q: Do the two GPUs have the same amount of shading units?

A: Yes. Both have 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Arc Pro B370?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, identical to the Intel Arc B370.

Q: Is there any difference in API support?

A: No. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the predecessor of the Intel Arc B370?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has no predecessor entry in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B370 lists HD Graphics-WM as its predecessor.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to the ATI Radeon HD 5770?

A: The ATI Radeon HD 5770 averages 1190, which is 0.5% higher than the Arc B370's 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.