Intel Arc A570M vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison, as the two GPUs have very different measurement profiles. The Intel Arc A570M has a single recorded benchmark score, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at all. This immediately shapes the analysis: the Intel part can be positioned against real measured performance, while the Lisuan part must be assessed on its architectural and specification characteristics alone.

The Intel Arc A570M delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. That places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the recorded data are tightly clustered: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392, which is 0.3% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085, which is 0.3% lower, the NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58528, which is 0.5% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 averages 58657, which is 0.7% higher. The Arc A570M sits almost exactly in the middle of this group, within a single percentage point of all four rivals. That indicates a GPU whose compute performance in OpenCL is competitive with a very specific performance tier, and the margin between it and its nearest neighbors is negligible in practical terms.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, by contrast, has a percentile rank of 50 and an average benchmark score of zero, with no nearest rivals listed. The data cannot show where it wins in measured workloads because no measured workloads exist for it in the database. Its wins, if any, are entirely theoretical and based on its listed specifications. Those specifications are substantial: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Arc A570M has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. On paper, the Lisuan part has 3 times the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, 1.5 times the ROPs, and roughly 4.6 times the FP32 throughput. It also has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and nearly double the memory bandwidth.

The use-case split, then, is stark. The Intel Arc A570M wins in the category of verified, measured performance: the database contains a real OpenCL score that can be compared against other GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in the category of raw specification headroom: its listed compute resources, memory capacity, and bandwidth are far above the Intel part, but none of that is confirmed by benchmark results. For any workload that depends on raw FP32 throughput, texture fill, pixel fill, or memory bandwidth, the Lisuan specifications suggest an advantage. For any workload where the question is what the hardware actually does under a standard compute test, the Intel part is the only one with data.

The Verdict

The data supports two different verdicts depending on what is being evaluated. If the analysis is limited to measured benchmark results, the Intel Arc A570M is the only GPU in this comparison with any recorded performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 is within 0.7% of four nearest rivals, all of which are desktop-class GPUs. That puts the Arc A570M in a credible position for a mobile integrated graphics solution, as it trades blows with parts that carry much higher power envelopes and larger physical footprints. The 88th percentile rank reinforces this: the part sits above the vast majority of all GPUs in the database in terms of measured OpenCL performance.

If the analysis is based on listed specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is the dominant part. It has 4.6 times the FP32 compute, 3 times the shading units, 192 TMUs versus 128, 96 ROPs versus 64, 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 224.0 GB/s. Its 225 W TDP and dual-slot, 248 mm physical design indicate a card intended for full-size desktop installation with a 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel part, by contrast, is an IGP with a 75 W TDP. The Lisuan part is, on paper, in an entirely different performance class.

The neutral reading of the data is that the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has not yet demonstrated its capabilities in any recorded benchmark, so its listed advantages remain unverified. The Intel Arc A570M has demonstrated its capabilities, and those capabilities are close to several well-known desktop GPUs. A user who trusts measured data should favor the Intel part. A user who trusts listed specifications should favor the Lisuan part, but must accept that the database contains no confirmation of those specifications translating into real scores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries recorded for this pair. The winsA and winsB fields both show zero. The comparison must therefore be built from the single Intel benchmark and the specification differences between the two parts.

The largest advantage in the measured data belongs to the Intel Arc A570M by default, since the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded score. That is not a meaningful performance win in the traditional sense, but it is a data availability win. The Intel part's 58239 OpenCL score, when placed against its nearest rivals, shows a delta of -0.3% versus the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, +0.3% versus the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, -0.5% versus the NVIDIA P102-100, and -0.7% versus the AMD Radeon PRO V710. None of these deltas exceed a single percentage point, which means the Arc A570M is effectively tied with all four in this specific test.

The largest advantages in the specification data belong to the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 4.6 times the Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is 4.6 times the Arc A570M's 10.65 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 2.3 times the Intel part's 83.20 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 2.3 times the Intel part's 166.4 GTexel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 1.9 times the Intel part's 224.0 GB/s. Its memory capacity of 12 GB is 1.5 times the Intel part's 8 GB. Its memory bus of 192 bit is 1.5 times the Intel part's 128 bit. Its shading unit count of 6144 is 3 times the Intel part's 2048.

The Intel part has no specification advantage in any field where the two differ, except for its lower power draw of 75 W versus 225 W, which is an efficiency and integration advantage rather than a performance one. The Intel part also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part lists Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part is built on the DG2-256 chip with Xe-HPG architecture, while the Lisuan part uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture. Both are manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the Intel part lists 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die with a density of 42.8 million transistors per square millimeter, while the Lisuan part lists unknown transistor count and die size.

FAQ

Q: What is the only recorded benchmark score for these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: It is within 0.7% of all four nearest rivals: 0.3% below the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, 0.3% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, 0.5% below the NVIDIA P102-100, and 0.7% below the AMD Radeon PRO V710.

Q: What are the biggest specification advantages for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX?

A: The Lisuan part lists 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 5.325 TFLOPS, 6144 shading units versus 2048, 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 224.0 GB/s, and 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB.

Q: What are the power and physical design differences?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP and is listed as an IGP, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires a 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. The Lisuan card measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which GPU has more render output units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 96 ROPs, while the Intel Arc A570M has 64 ROPs.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from completely different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation under the Arc 5 Mobile family. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip built on an architecture called TrueGPU, part of the 7G100 generation. It is also fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The Intel part includes 16 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan part lists no ray tracing core count at all. Neither part lists tensor cores. The Intel part has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Lisuan part has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. These are not incremental differences; the Lisuan part has triple the shading units, 50% more TMUs, and 50% more ROPs.

Memory architecture also differs significantly. The Intel part uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with memory clocked at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan part uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with memory clocked at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan part has both a wider bus and faster memory, which explains its nearly double bandwidth figure.

The bus interface differs as well. The Intel part connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Lisuan part uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Intel part's display outputs are described as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by the laptop or device it is integrated into. The Lisuan part has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, consistent with a standalone desktop card.

The API support is close but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3. This means the Intel part is one Vulkan revision ahead in its listed API compatibility.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification field. The Intel Arc A570M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX lists no base or boost clock at all. The Intel part has a 75 W TDP and an IGP slot width, while the Lisuan part has a 225 W TDP and a dual-slot design with a 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Compute throughput differs by a factor of roughly 4.6. The Intel part lists 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The Lisuan part lists 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s for Intel and 192.0 GPixel/s for Lisuan. Texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s for Intel and 384.0 GTexel/s for Lisuan.

Memory capacity is 8 GB versus 12 GB. Memory type is GDDR6 for both. Bus width is 128 bit versus 192 bit. Bandwidth is 224.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The Intel memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective, while the Lisuan memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The physical dimensions are only listed for the Lisuan part: 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Intel part has no listed dimensions, consistent with its IGP form factor. The Intel part has a listed release date of 2023-07-31, while the Lisuan part has a listed release date of 2026-03-16. Both are marked as Active in production status. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database. The Intel part has no predecessor or successor listed, and the same is true for the Lisuan part.

The shading unit count is 2048 for Intel and 6144 for Lisuan. The TMU count is 128 versus 192. The ROP count is 64 versus 96. The Intel part has 16 ray tracing cores; the Lisuan part lists none. The Intel part is built on a 269 mm² die with 11,500 million transistors; the Lisuan part lists both as unknown. The transistor density is 42.8 million per square millimeter for Intel and not listed for Lisuan.

The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for Intel and PCIe 4.0 x16 for Lisuan. Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan. Vulkan support is 1.4 for Intel and 1.3 for Lisuan. DirectX and OpenGL support are identical at 12 Ultimate (12_2) and 4.6 respectively. The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 58239 and an 88th percentile rank, while the Lisuan part has an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile rank.