Intel Arc A530M vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

# Intel Arc A530M vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA

The Intel Arc A530M and Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA occupy fundamentally different positions in the GPU landscape. The Arc A530M is a mobile integrated graphics solution with recorded benchmark data, while the LX ULTRA is a dual-slot desktop card with no benchmark entries in the database. The data shows a clear split: the Arc A530M has measurable performance scores and sits at the 85th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking, which reflects the absence of recorded test results rather than a performance verdict.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A530M wins in the only category where direct measurements exist: recorded benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,735 and Vulkan score of 43,492 place it at the 85th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The average benchmark score of 46,614 positions it within a tight cluster of competitors, including the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46,601 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46,702 (-0.2% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 46,043 (1.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45,972 (1.4% delta). These margins are narrow, indicating that the Arc A530M performs essentially on par with its nearest rivals in the recorded data.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in raw specification counts across nearly every hardware category. It delivers 6,144 shading units versus 1,536 for the Arc A530M, 192 texture mapping units versus 96, and 96 render output units versus 48. The LX ULTRA also doubles the memory bus width to 192 bit from 128 bit, and its 24 GB GDDR6 memory capacity triples the Arc A530M's 8 GB. The FP32 compute rate of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than six times the Arc A530M's 3.994 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA achieves a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, compared to 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s for the Arc A530M. However, these advantages exist only on paper since the database contains no benchmark results for the LX ULTRA.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on the same 6 nm process at TSMC, but the similarities end there. The Intel Arc A530M uses the DG2-256 chip with the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation of Arc 5 Mobile products. The LX ULTRA employs the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, manufactured by an unknown company. The Arc A530M integrates 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The Arc A530M runs 8 GB of GDDR6 at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, producing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth over a 128-bit bus. The LX ULTRA runs 24 GB of GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus. The LX ULTRA's memory bandwidth is nearly double that of the Arc A530M.

Feature sets also diverge. The Arc A530M includes 12 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA's ray tracing core count is not listed. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Arc A530M supports Vulkan 1.4 compared to Vulkan 1.3 for the LX ULTRA. The bus interface differs as well: the Arc A530M uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Arc A530M is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors and a TDP of 65 W, while the LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card requiring a single 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested power supply, and drawing 225 W.

The Verdict

The database presents a unique situation where one product has verified performance data and the other has none. The Intel Arc A530M offers recorded benchmark scores that place it at the 85th percentile, with its average score of 46,614 nearly matching the AMD Radeon RX 5600M and coming within 1.4% of the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation. For applications where validated performance matters, the Arc A530M is the only option with measurable results.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers substantially higher hardware specifications across the board, including 24 GB of memory, 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and a 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. These figures suggest a much higher theoretical capability, but the absence of benchmark data means the database cannot confirm real-world performance. The LX ULTRA's 50th percentile ranking with an average score of zero reflects this data gap. The choice between these two products depends entirely on whether the user prioritizes verified performance (Arc A530M) or raw specifications without test confirmation (LX ULTRA).

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher recorded benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc A530M is the only one with benchmark entries. It scores 49,735 in Geekbench OpenCL and 43,492 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 46,614.

Q: How does the Arc A530M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A530M's average score of 46,614 is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46,601 (0% delta), slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46,702 (-0.2% delta), and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 46,043 (1.2% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45,972 (1.4% delta).

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Intel Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6. The LX ULTRA also has a 192-bit memory bus versus the Arc A530M's 128-bit bus.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc A530M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has a 65 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and needs a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any ray tracing cores?

A: The database does not list ray tracing cores for the LX ULTRA. The Intel Arc A530M includes 12 ray tracing cores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database is empty, meaning there are no direct comparison tests between the Intel Arc A530M and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The Arc A530M's recorded scores come from Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, while the LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries at all.

The Arc A530M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,735 exceeds its Vulkan score of 43,492 by approximately 14.4%, indicating stronger performance in OpenCL workloads. The average benchmark score of 46,614 sits between these two values. In the context of its nearest rivals, the Arc A530M's average score trails the AMD Radeon RX 6550M by just 0.2% (88 points) and leads the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.2% (571 points). The margin against the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 1.4% (642 points). These differences are minor and fall within typical run-to-run variance for GPU benchmarks.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's absence from the benchmark database means its theoretical advantages cannot be validated. The FP32 compute rate of 24.58 TFLOPS, the 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and the 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are all significantly higher than the Arc A530M's corresponding figures, but no test results confirm whether these specifications translate into actual performance. The LX ULTRA's 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder pending benchmark data, not a measured performance level.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A530M | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | not listed |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1536 | 6144 |

| Texture Mapping Units | 96 | 192 |

| Render Output Units | 48 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 62.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Compute | 3.994 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 65 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | none | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | not listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Support | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | not listed | 268 mm (10.6 inches) |

| Height | not listed | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | not listed | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2026-03-16 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 85 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 46,614 | 0 |