Intel Arc A530M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER and Intel Arc A530M occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, and benchmark data confirms a decisive performance gap. The RTX 4080 SUPER wins both shared tests by margins of 340.5% and 498%, respectively, while the Arc A530M counters with a dramatically lower power envelope and a much smaller physical footprint. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided fact pack to detail where each card stands.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 219,065, while the Intel Arc A530M scores 49,735. This gives NVIDIA a 340.5% lead in that test.

Q: Which GPU wins in Geekbench Vulkan, and by how much?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER wins with a score of 260,075 versus 43,492 for the Arc A530M, representing a 498% advantage.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54,209, while the Arc A530M averages 46,614. The RTX 4080 SUPER sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and the Arc A530M is at the 85th percentile.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each card?

A: For the RTX 4080 SUPER, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 with an average score of 54,247 and a delta of -0.1%. For the Arc A530M, the closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600M with an average score of 46,601 and a delta of 0%.

Q: What are the memory configurations?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER, built on a 5 nm process, has a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The Arc A530M, on a 6 nm process, has a density of 42.8M per mm².

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on entirely different architectures and process nodes. The RTX 4080 SUPER uses NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm TSMC node, while the Arc A530M uses Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm TSMC node. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s chip, AD103, packs 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die, yielding a density of 121.1M per mm². In contrast, the Arc A530M’s DG2-256 chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a density of 42.8M per mm².

The compute resources diverge sharply. The RTX 4080 SUPER features 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 80 RT cores, and 320 tensor cores. The Arc A530M has 1,536 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 12 RT cores, with no tensor core count listed. The FP32 throughput is 52.22 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 3.994 TFLOPS for Intel, a roughly 13x difference. FP16 performance also differs: the RTX 4080 SUPER achieves 52.22 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc A530M reaches 7.987 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory architecture is another fundamental split. The RTX 4080 SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X with a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc A530M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s. These numbers indicate the RTX 4080 SUPER is designed for high-resolution, bandwidth-heavy workloads, while the Arc A530M targets efficiency and portability.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but their physical designs could not be more different. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 700 W suggested PSU. The Arc A530M is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no dimensions, power connectors, or PSU requirements listed, and its display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent."

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Only two benchmark tests overlap between the two GPUs, and the results are one-sided. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 219,065 against the Arc A530M’s 49,735. This is a 340.5% delta, meaning NVIDIA delivers nearly 4.4 times the raw compute performance in this API. The gap is even wider in Geekbench Vulkan: 260,075 versus 43,492, a 498% advantage. That means the RTX 4080 SUPER is roughly 6 times faster in Vulkan compute tasks.

These deltas are consistent with the theoretical specifications. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s FP32 throughput of 52.22 TFLOPS dwarfs the Arc A530M’s 3.994 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s versus 62.40 GPixel/s reinforces the same story. Texture rate follows suit: 816.0 GTexel/s for NVIDIA versus 124.8 GTexel/s for Intel.

The RTX 4080 SUPER wins both head-to-head tests, giving it 2 wins to 0 for the Arc A530M. However, the Arc A530M’s average benchmark score of 46,614 is only 14% lower than the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 54,209, suggesting that in some aggregate workloads, the gap narrows considerably. The percentile rankings are close too: 86th for NVIDIA and 85th for Intel, indicating that both cards sit near the top of the overall GPU distribution, albeit in very different performance classes.

Specification Differences

The most obvious difference is power consumption: the RTX 4080 SUPER has a TDP of 320 W, while the Arc A530M is rated at just 65 W. This 255 W gap explains the form factor difference — the NVIDIA card is triple-slot with a 16-pin connector, while the Intel part is an IGP with no external power needed.

Clock speeds also diverge. The RTX 4080 SUPER runs at a 2295 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost, with memory at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective). The Arc A530M has a 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA card’s memory clock is more than 60% higher, contributing to its bandwidth advantage.

The bus interface differs: the RTX 4080 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc A530M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This halves the available bandwidth for the Intel card, though its lower performance ceiling makes this less critical. The RTX 4080 SUPER has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, whereas the Arc A530M’s outputs are dependent on the portable device it is integrated into.

Production status and release dates also differ. The RTX 4080 SUPER is end-of-life, released on 2024-01-30, with a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The Arc A530M is active, released on 2023-07-31, with no MSRP listed. The NVIDIA card’s predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series, while the Intel card has no listed predecessor or successor.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4080 SUPER wins decisively in raw compute and memory bandwidth. Its 736.3 GB/s bandwidth and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 make it suited for heavy 3D rendering, high-resolution gaming, and compute-intensive tasks like AI inference (with 320 tensor cores). The 16 GB VRAM also allows it to handle larger datasets and textures than the Arc A530M’s 8 GB.

The Arc A530M wins on efficiency and portability. Its 65 W TDP is one-fifth of the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 320 W, making it viable for thin-and-light laptops or small-form-factor systems where power and space are constrained. Its IGP form factor means no extra cooling or power delivery hardware is needed, simplifying system integration. The Arc A530M’s 42.8M transistors per mm² density is lower, but its 6 nm process still offers modern features like ray tracing (12 RT cores) and DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

In terms of benchmark wins, the RTX 4080 SUPER takes both head-to-head tests. However, the Arc A530M’s average score of 46,614 is close to its rivals — the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46,601 (0% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46,702 (-0.2%) — indicating it competes well within its own performance class. The RTX 4080 SUPER, by contrast, sits within 2.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and the AMD Radeon 8060S, showing it is not the absolute top performer either.

The Verdict

For users who need maximum performance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the clear choice. It leads by 340.5% in OpenCL and 498% in Vulkan, offers 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, and delivers 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. Its 86th percentile ranking and average score of 54,209 place it among the best GPUs available, and its 320 W TDP is a reasonable trade-off for that level of capability. This card is for desktop systems with ample space and power delivery, as evidenced by its triple-slot design and 700 W suggested PSU.

For users prioritizing efficiency and mobility, the Intel Arc A530M is the appropriate pick. Its 65 W TDP, IGP form factor, and lack of external power connectors make it ideal for portable devices. While its performance is far below the RTX 4080 SUPER — 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth — its 85th percentile ranking shows it is still competitive within its segment, matching the AMD Radeon RX 5600M exactly (0% delta). The Arc A530M supports modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, making it capable for mainstream gaming and productivity on the go.

The data does not support a single "best" card; it supports two distinct use cases. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a high-end desktop part with end-of-life status, while the Arc A530M is an active, power-efficient mobile solution. Choose the RTX 4080 SUPER for raw performance and VRAM capacity, or the Arc A530M for low power draw and portability. The 498% Vulkan gap is the single most telling number — it shows the performance chasm these two products occupy, and no amount of efficiency can bridge that divide for compute-heavy workloads.