Intel Arc A530M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in raw benchmark performance?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has recorded benchmark scores of 49,735 in Geekbench OpenCL and 43,492 in Geekbench Vulkan, giving it an average benchmark score of 46,614. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average score of 0.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A530M sits in the 85th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is in the 50th percentile, though this is based on no actual benchmark submissions.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the Intel Arc A530M?

A: The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600M with an average score of 46,601 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46,702 (-0.2% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 46,043 (1.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45,972 (1.4% delta).

Q: Which GPU has higher compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Intel Arc A530M delivers 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has a TDP of 65 W and uses an IGP slot width. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, requires a dual-slot width, uses one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A530M is built on the DG2-256 chip using Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile). It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. Its memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, from the 7G100 generation. It is also fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. The GPU has no recorded base or boost clocks. Its memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The Intel Arc A530M integrates 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, 48 raster operation units, and 12 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel Arc A530M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has display outputs marked as portable device dependent. The Lisuan card is physically a dual-slot design measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The Intel part is an IGP solution with no listed dimensions.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the Intel Arc A530M and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The Intel Arc A530M has two recorded benchmark scores, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has none. Consequently, the wins count stands at 0 for both parts in direct comparison.

The Intel Arc A530M's average benchmark score of 46,614 places it within a tight competitive cluster. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, scores 46,601, a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is marginally ahead at 46,702, representing a -0.2% delta from the Intel part's perspective. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 trails by 1.2% with 46,043, and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation trails by 1.4% with 45,972. These margins indicate that the Intel Arc A530M performs essentially on par with its immediate competitors, with differences well within a couple of percentage points.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark data, making any performance comparison against the Intel part impossible from recorded measurements. The theoretical specifications, however, suggest a much higher compute ceiling: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 3.994 TFLOPS for the Intel part, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 7.987 TFLOPS. The Lisuan card also delivers 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate, compared to 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s for the Intel Arc A530M.

Memory bandwidth differs substantially. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus, while the Intel Arc A530M reaches 224.0 GB/s over a 128-bit bus. That is a 208.0 GB/s gap in favor of the Lisuan part, which could matter in bandwidth-sensitive workloads such as high-resolution textures or large dataset processing.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A530M | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | 7G100 |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | Not listed |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1536 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 96 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 12 | Not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 62.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.994 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 65 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | Not listed | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2026-06-17 |

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear split between these two GPUs. The Intel Arc A530M is a validated, measured product with an 85th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 46,614. It competes directly with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Radeon RX 6550M, NVIDIA RTX A2000, and NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation, all within a 1.4% performance band. Its 65 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for compact or portable implementations.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents a different profile entirely. It has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and sits at the 50th percentile by default. Its specifications indicate a substantially larger compute configuration: 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 12 GB of VRAM. It also demands 225 W of power, a dual-slot cooler, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a physical footprint of 294 mm in length. The release date of 2026-06-17 places it as a later product, but without measured data, its actual performance cannot be verified against the Intel part.

For users who require verified performance, the Intel Arc A530M is the only option with recorded evidence in the database. For those who prioritize raw specification counts and are willing to accept unverified claims, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 offers a much larger memory pool, wider bus, and higher theoretical throughput.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Arc A530M wins on verified performance. The database contains two benchmark scores for this GPU, with an average of 46,614 and an 85th percentile standing. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.4% of its score, confirming that it delivers consistent, measurable results in the mid-range segment. The 65 W TDP and IGP slot width make it viable for systems with limited power and space budgets. The 12 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support that the Lisuan part lacks entirely. Vulkan 1.4 support is also ahead of the Lisuan part's Vulkan 1.3.

Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins on theoretical compute and memory. The specification sheet shows 6,144 shading units versus 1,536, 192 TMUs versus 96, and 96 ROPs versus 48. FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS, a 6.2x difference. Memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s, and the 12 GB frame buffer is 50% larger than 8 GB. The 192-bit bus and 18 Gbps effective memory speed support high-bandwidth workloads. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface doubles the lane count compared to the Intel part's x8 connection. The dual-slot cooler and 225 W TDP indicate a desktop-oriented design with room for sustained operation.

Workload split: The Intel Arc A530M suits scenarios where validated driver support and measured performance matter, such as general mobile graphics or entry-level desktop tasks. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 targets applications that can exploit its larger memory capacity and higher compute rates, assuming the unverified specifications translate into real-world results. For ray tracing workloads, the Intel part has dedicated RT cores; the Lisuan part lists none. For high-resolution texture workloads or compute-heavy tasks, the Lisuan part's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a structural advantage that the Intel part cannot match.