AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two GPUs into entirely different use cases. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU is a 28 W, 16 GB LPDDR5 part with a 128 bit memory bus and 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. It is built for compact, low-power systems, as indicated by its lack of power connectors, its single USB Type-C display output, and its 6 nm TSMC process. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a 225 W, dual-slot desktop card with a 192 bit GDDR6 interface delivering 432.0 GB/s, a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The data indicates the LX 7G100 is designed for high-throughput rendering and compute workloads where raw fill rates and FP32 throughput dominate.

In terms of raw shading capability, the LX 7G100 wins decisively. It packs 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. That is an 8x difference in shading units, a 4x difference in TMUs, and a 3x difference in ROPs. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the Z2 Go GPU delivers 4.147 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.294 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX 7G100 is roughly 5.9x ahead in FP32 throughput and 5.9x ahead in FP16 throughput. This makes the LX 7G100 the clear choice for heavy 3D rendering, high-resolution texture work, and any workload that scales with shading units and memory bandwidth.

The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU wins on efficiency and integration. Its 28 W TDP versus the LX 7G100's 225 W TDP means the Z2 Go GPU uses roughly one-eighth the power budget. The Z2 Go GPU also carries 12 ray tracing cores, a feature the LX 7G100 does not list at all. The Z2 Go GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 lists Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so API-level feature parity exists at the top tier. The Z2 Go GPU's 16 GB LPDDR5 memory exceeds the LX 7G100's 12 GB GDDR6 in capacity, though the LX 7G100's bandwidth is 4.2x higher. For workloads that need large working sets but modest bandwidth, the Z2 Go GPU has the edge; for bandwidth-bound tasks, the LX 7G100 dominates.

The LX 7G100 also wins on pixel and texture throughput. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 86.40 GPixel/s for the Z2 Go GPU, a 2.2x advantage. Its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 129.6 GTexel/s, a 2.96x advantage. These numbers indicate the LX 7G100 is better suited for high-detail scenes with heavy texture filtering and multi-sample anti-aliasing. The Z2 Go GPU's lower ROP count and TMU count cap its performance in those areas.

Power delivery and physical design further separate the two. The LX 7G100 requires a single 8-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Z2 Go GPU needs no power connector. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width; the Z2 Go GPU has no listed dimensions, indicating it is likely an embedded or mobile-class part. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card, while the Z2 Go GPU has no slot width listed. The Z2 Go GPU's single USB Type-C output suggests a portable or all-in-one system, whereas the LX 7G100's four DisplayPort outputs target multi-monitor desktop setups.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share a manufacturing foundation: both use a 6 nm process at TSMC. That is where the architectural similarity ends. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the Rembrandt+ chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture and a 208 mm² die size containing 13,100 million transistors. Its transistor density is 63.0M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with a "TrueGPU" architecture, and its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are not recorded in the database. The Z2 Go GPU's architecture is a known AMD design; the LX 7G100's architecture is proprietary to Lisuan Tech with no comparable structural data.

The memory subsystems differ fundamentally. The Z2 Go GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128 bit bus, with memory clocked at 800 MHz and 6.4 Gbps effective, producing 102.4 GB/s. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective, producing 432.0 GB/s. The LX 7G100's bus width is 1.5x wider, its effective memory speed is 2.8x faster, and its bandwidth is 4.2x higher. The Z2 Go GPU has 4 GB more capacity, which helps when a workload's working set exceeds 12 GB, but the LX 7G100's bandwidth advantage makes it far more capable for streaming large textures and geometry.

Compute resource allocation differs sharply. The Z2 Go GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count listed. The LX 7G100's shading unit count is 8x higher, its TMU count is 4x higher, and its ROP count is 3x higher. The Z2 Go GPU's ray tracing cores give it a hardware feature the LX 7G100 does not document, meaning ray-traced effects rely on different paths in each part.

Clock behavior differs as well. The Z2 Go GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded. The Z2 Go GPU's boost clock is high relative to its power envelope, which suggests a design that ramps aggressively under load. The LX 7G100's performance is defined entirely by its shading unit count and memory bandwidth, not by clock speed data.

API support shows a minor divergence. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Z2 Go GPU supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. This means the Z2 Go GPU is one Vulkan revision ahead, which can matter for developers targeting the latest Vulkan extensions. The LX 7G100's older Vulkan revision does not affect DirectX-based workloads.

Physical and power architecture also differ. The Z2 Go GPU has no listed power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no bus interface. The LX 7G100 has a single 8-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and dual-slot dimensions. The Z2 Go GPU's lack of a bus interface and power connectors reinforces its role as a low-power integrated or embedded solution. The LX 7G100's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a high-bandwidth host connection that matches its high-throughput design.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark scores, no wins for either GPU, and no nearest rival comparisons. The analysis therefore relies on the recorded specification data. The largest measured differences appear in compute throughput and memory bandwidth.

FP32 performance: the LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 5.93x the Z2 Go GPU's 4.147 TFLOPS. FP16 performance: the LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS, which is 5.93x the Z2 Go GPU's 8.294 TFLOPS. Both ratios hold because each GPU's FP16 rate is exactly double its FP32 rate (2:1). The LX 7G100's advantage is consistent across both precisions.

Texture rate: the LX 7G100 achieves 384.0 GTexel/s, which is 2.96x the Z2 Go GPU's 129.6 GTexel/s. Pixel rate: the LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 2.22x the Z2 Go GPU's 86.40 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth: the LX 7G100 achieves 432.0 GB/s, which is 4.22x the Z2 Go GPU's 102.4 GB/s. The LX 7G100 leads in every throughput metric recorded.

The Z2 Go GPU leads in memory capacity, with 16 GB versus 12 GB, a 1.33x advantage. It also leads in ray tracing cores, with 12 documented cores versus none listed for the LX 7G100. The Z2 Go GPU's boost clock of 2700 MHz is the only clock speed recorded for either GPU, so no direct clock comparison is possible. The Z2 Go GPU's TDP of 28 W versus the LX 7G100's 225 W means the Z2 Go GPU draws 12.4% of the LX 7G100's power budget while delivering 16.9% of its FP32 throughput and 23.7% of its pixel rate. The efficiency ratio favors the Z2 Go GPU on a per-watt basis, but the LX 7G100 wins on absolute performance.

Die size and transistor data exist only for the Z2 Go GPU: 208 mm² and 13,100 million transistors. No comparable figures exist for the LX 7G100, so structural efficiency cannot be compared. Both parts are active products, with the Z2 Go GPU released on 2024-12-31 and the LX 7G100 released on 2026-06-17.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 5.93x the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU's 4.147 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory systems compare?

A: The Z2 Go GPU has 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128 bit bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 4.22x the bandwidth; the Z2 Go GPU has 1.33x the capacity.

Q: Does either GPU support ray tracing?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU lists 12 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 does not list any ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The Z2 Go GPU has a 28 W TDP and no power connectors. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, a single 8-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU supports newer graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Z2 Go GPU supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: How do the pixel and texture rates compare?

A: The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The Z2 Go GPU achieves 86.40 GPixel/s and 129.6 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 is 2.22x faster in pixel rate and 2.96x faster in texture rate.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct buyers. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU suits systems where power draw, compact integration, and memory capacity matter more than raw throughput. Its 28 W TDP, lack of power connectors, single USB Type-C output, and 16 GB LPDDR5 make it appropriate for portable or low-profile designs. Its 12 ray tracing cores and Vulkan 1.4 support give it feature advantages over the LX 7G100. Its 4.147 TFLOPS FP32 and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth are modest, but so is its power envelope.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 suits desktop workstations and gaming rigs where absolute performance is the priority. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate place it far ahead of the Z2 Go GPU in every throughput metric. Its 12 GB GDDR6 is smaller than the Z2 Go GPU's 16 GB LPDDR5, but the bandwidth advantage is overwhelming. Its dual-slot design, 294 mm length, 8-pin power connector, 550 W suggested PSU, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs define a traditional high-performance desktop card.

Users who need multi-monitor output, high-resolution rendering, or heavy texture workloads should select the LX 7G100. Users who need a low-power GPU with ray tracing cores, a newer Vulkan revision, and more memory capacity should select the Z2 Go GPU. The two parts do not compete for the same socket or system class; the recorded data shows the LX 7G100 as a performance-oriented desktop GPU and the Z2 Go GPU as an efficiency-oriented compact GPU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Rembrandt+ | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 6 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | 13,100 million | unknown |

| Die size | 208 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 63.0M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 800 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 2700 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 800 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 768 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 48 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 12 | null |

| Pixel rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.147 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 28 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | null | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus interface | null | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | null | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Release date | 2024-12-31 | 2026-06-17 |

| Production status | Active | Active |