AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither card has a win count assigned in the database. However, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has two standalone benchmark scores that can be examined. It scores 5424 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 109309 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 57367, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores at all. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking sits at 50. This means the database has no performance data for the LX ULTRA, making any direct numerical comparison of their compute performance impossible. The RX 9070 GRE, by contrast, is a fully measured product with established results.

The nearest rivals for the RX 9070 GRE provide context for its average score. The Intel Arc A580 averages 57756, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9070 GRE. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085, 1.2% higher. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58239, 1.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392, 1.8% higher. These deltas indicate that the RX 9070 GRE sits in a tight cluster of GPUs, all within roughly two percentage points of each other. The LX ULTRA has no such rival list, so its standing among similar products cannot be assessed.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, belonging to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. It is built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are listed as unknown in the database.

The RX 9070 GRE has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, but its ray tracing core count is not recorded. The shading unit count on the LX ULTRA is exactly double that of the RX 9070 GRE, yet its texture and pixel throughput figures are lower. The RX 9070 GRE delivers a texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s, while the LX ULTRA delivers 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s respectively.

Compute throughput also favors the RX 9070 GRE in FP32. It reaches 34.28 TFLOPS, compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX ULTRA. In FP16, the RX 9070 GRE matches its FP32 figure at 34.28 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, which means its FP16 output is higher than its FP32 output. This suggests different design priorities between the two architectures.

The RX 9070 GRE has a base clock of 1420 MHz, a boost clock of 2790 MHz, and a game clock of 2220 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock values recorded. Both cards run their memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The RX 9070 GRE uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 9070 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX ULTRA also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more video memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both use a 192-bit memory bus and provide 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How do their compute capabilities compare?

A: The RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS in FP32 and 34.28 TFLOPS in FP16. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16. The RX 9070 GRE is ahead in FP32, while the LX ULTRA is ahead in FP16.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the LX ULTRA?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, and its average benchmark score is 0. The RX 9070 GRE has recorded scores of 5424 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 109309 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: Do both cards use the same memory speed?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA use memory running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, and both have 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What are their power requirements?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W and uses two 8-pin power connectors. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector. Both have a suggested power supply rating of 550 W.

Q: Which card is smaller?

A: The LX ULTRA has recorded dimensions of 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The RX 9070 GRE has no dimensions listed in the database, so a size comparison cannot be made.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA differ across several recorded specifications. The RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip on RDNA 4.0 architecture from the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation, while the LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. The RX 9070 GRE is built on a 4 nm TSMC process with 53,900 million transistors and a 357 mm² die. The LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm TSMC process, with transistor count and die size unknown.

The RX 9070 GRE has 3072 shading units and 48 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units and no recorded ray tracing core count. Both have 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs. Clock speeds differ significantly: the RX 9070 GRE has a 1420 MHz base clock, 2790 MHz boost clock, and 2220 MHz game clock, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded clock speeds. Memory capacity differs, with 12 GB on the RX 9070 GRE and 24 GB on the LX ULTRA, though both use GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus at 432.0 GB/s.

Throughput figures differ as well. The RX 9070 GRE produces 267.8 GPixel/s and 535.7 GTexel/s, while the LX ULTRA produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 34.28 TFLOPS for the RX 9070 GRE and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX ULTRA. FP16 performance is 34.28 TFLOPS (1:1) for the RX 9070 GRE and 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for the LX ULTRA.

Power and connectivity also differ. The RX 9070 GRE has a 220 W TDP with two 8-pin power connectors. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP with one 16-pin power connector. The RX 9070 GRE uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the RX 9070 GRE has one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1a ports, while the LX ULTRA has four DisplayPort 1.4a ports. The RX 9070 GRE supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The RX 9070 GRE has a launch MSRP of 549 USD and a release date of 2025-05-07. The LX ULTRA has no launch MSRP recorded and a release date of 2026-03-16. The RX 9070 GRE is in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, while the LX ULTRA is in the 50th percentile. The RX 9070 GRE has four nearest rivals with scores ranging from 57756 to 58392, all within 1.8% of its average score. The LX ULTRA has no nearest rivals listed.

The Verdict

The database shows a clear split between these two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has measured performance data, an 87th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 57367. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark results, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average score of 0. Any buyer or builder relying on recorded performance data can only make an informed decision about the RX 9070 GRE.

The RX 9070 GRE also leads in several raw specifications. It has a higher FP32 throughput at 34.28 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, higher pixel and texture rates, a faster PCIe interface (5.0 x16 versus 4.0 x16), and a newer process node at 4 nm versus 6 nm. It also has a recorded boost clock of 2790 MHz, whereas the LX ULTRA has no clock speed data at all.

The LX ULTRA counters with double the memory capacity at 24 GB versus 12 GB, a higher FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 34.28 TFLOPS, and double the shading units at 6144 versus 3072. It also has a lower TDP difference of only 5 W, with 225 W versus 220 W. Its dimensions are recorded, while the RX 9070 GRE has none listed.

For a buyer who prioritizes measured performance, established architecture data, and a known launch MSRP of 549 USD, the RX 9070 GRE is the only option with verifiable results. For a buyer who needs maximum memory capacity, the LX ULTRA offers 24 GB, but there is no benchmark evidence in the database to show what that memory delivers in practice.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE wins in every category where the database has actual performance measurements. It has recorded benchmark scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad and Geekbench OpenCL, while the LX ULTRA has none. It wins in FP32 compute, pixel rate, texture rate, and has a higher transistor count at 53,900 million. It uses a newer 4 nm process, supports PCIe 5.0, and offers newer display outputs including HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a. Its Vulkan support is newer at 1.4 versus 1.3. It also has a lower TDP at 220 W versus 225 W.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in memory capacity with 24 GB, double the 12 GB of the RX 9070 GRE. It wins in FP16 compute with 49.15 TFLOPS, which is 43% higher than the RX 9070 GRE's 34.28 TFLOPS. It has double the shading units at 6144, which may indicate a different compute layout, though its lower texture and pixel rates suggest those units do not translate to higher raster throughput. It is also the only card with recorded physical dimensions, at 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm. Its single 16-pin power connector differs from the RX 9070 GRE's two 8-pin connectors, which matters for power supply cable compatibility.

The RX 9070 GRE is the safer choice based on the data. It has a full specification sheet, measured performance, and a position in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The LX ULTRA remains an unverified product in this database, with no benchmark scores and no rival comparisons. Its strengths are limited to memory capacity, FP16 throughput, and shading unit count, none of which have been validated by recorded test results.