AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is a graphics card from the Radeon RX 9000 series, manufactured by AMD. It uses the Navi 48 chip built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, and was released on 2025-05-07.

Q: What is the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a graphics card from the 7G100 generation, manufactured by an unknown company. It uses the 7G106 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, and was released on 2026-06-17.

Q: How much memory do these cards have, and what is the memory bandwidth?

A: Both cards have 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This results in a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s for both.

Q: What is the difference in shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, which is double the 3072 shading units on the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE. However, the AMD card has a higher FP32 compute rating of 34.28 TFLOPS compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan Tech card.

Q: Which card has a higher benchmark percentile rank?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE ranks in the 87th percentile among all GPUs, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 ranks in the 50th percentile. The AMD card has recorded benchmark scores, while the Lisuan Tech card has no benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What are the pixel and texture rates for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has a pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a lower pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE wins in raw compute throughput and fill-rate metrics. Its FP32 performance of 34.28 TFLOPS is significantly higher than the 24.58 TFLOPS of the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, indicating a substantial advantage in general compute workloads and traditional rasterization tasks. The AMD card also leads in pixel rate with 267.8 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and in texture rate with 535.7 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. These metrics suggest the AMD card is better suited for high-resolution rendering and texture-heavy scenes.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in FP16 compute throughput. It delivers 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD card delivers 34.28 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. This means the Lisuan Tech card can process half-precision floating-point operations at a much faster rate, which could benefit workloads that leverage FP16 acceleration.

The Lisuan Tech card also offers more shading units (6144 versus 3072) and a different power connector configuration (1x 8-pin versus 2x 8-pin), potentially simplifying installation in systems with limited power connectors. However, the AMD card uses a newer PCIe interface (PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16), providing double the bandwidth for data transfer between the GPU and the rest of the system.

In terms of display outputs, the AMD card provides a mix of HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, while the Lisuan Tech card offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. This gives the AMD card an edge for connectivity with the latest displays requiring DisplayPort 2.1a or HDMI 2.1b.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The difference in process node means the AMD card uses a more advanced manufacturing process, which typically allows for higher transistor density and better power efficiency.

The AMD card has 53,900 million transistors on a die size of 357 mm², giving a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The Lisuan Tech card has unknown transistor count and die size, making direct density comparisons impossible. However, the larger process node suggests the Lisuan Tech card would likely have lower transistor density.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech card supports Vulkan 1.3, a minor version difference. The AMD card includes 48 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan Tech card has no listed ray tracing cores, indicating a potential difference in ray tracing capability.

The AMD card has a base clock of 1420 MHz, a boost clock of 2790 MHz, and a game clock of 2220 MHz. The Lisuan Tech card has no listed base, boost, or game clocks, making clock-speed comparisons impossible. The memory clock is identical at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for both. The AMD card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the Lisuan Tech card uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The most notable specification differences between the two cards are in compute units and clock speeds. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. While the shading unit count doubles, the TMU and ROP counts are identical.

The AMD card has a TDP of 220 W, while the Lisuan Tech card has a TDP of 225 W, a difference of 5 W. Both are dual-slot cards and require a 550 W suggested PSU. The power connector configuration differs: the AMD card uses 2x 8-pin connectors, while the Lisuan Tech card uses 1x 8-pin.

The AMD card has no listed dimensions, while the Lisuan Tech card has dimensions of 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 549 USD, while the Lisuan Tech card has no launch MSRP.

The AMD card supports a combination of HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, while the Lisuan Tech card offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The AMD card has a production status of Active and was released on 2025-05-07, while the Lisuan Tech card also has a production status of Active but was released on 2026-06-17.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has recorded benchmark scores in two tests: 5424 in 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 and 109309 in geekbench_opencl. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores.

The AMD card has an average benchmark score of 57367 and ranks in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A580 with an average score of 57756 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM with an average score of 58085 (1.2% higher), the Intel Arc A570M with an average score of 58239 (1.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT with an average score of 58392 (1.8% higher). These deltas indicate the AMD card is slightly below these rivals in average benchmark score.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0 and ranks in the 50th percentile, with no nearest rivals listed. The lack of benchmark data means the performance of the Lisuan Tech card cannot be directly compared to the AMD card or any other GPU in the database.

Based on the available data, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE shows a clear advantage in FP32 compute (34.28 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS), pixel rate (267.8 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s), and texture rate (535.7 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s). These metrics suggest the AMD card would outperform the Lisuan Tech card in most standard graphics workloads.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 shows an advantage in FP16 compute (49.15 TFLOPS versus 34.28 TFLOPS), indicating it may be better suited for compute workloads that can utilize half-precision arithmetic. The card also has double the shading units, though without benchmark data, the practical impact of this specification difference remains unverified.