AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA take different paths to similar raw compute performance. The RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the LX ULTRA posts 24.58 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 1.7% in favor of the AMD card. In pixel fillrate, the RX 9060 XT LP reaches 195.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX ULTRA, an edge of about 1.7% as well. Texture fillrate shows the same pattern: 390.4 GTexel/s for the RX 9060 XT LP against 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX ULTRA, again a 1.7% margin.

The recorded benchmark data for the RX 9060 XT LP shows an OpenCL score of 88,183 and a Vulkan score of 39,476 on Geekbench. The LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries in the database, so direct comparison of measured application performance is not possible. What the database does show is the RX 9060 XT LP sits at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 63,830. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63,842 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63,775 (0.1% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693 (0.2% ahead). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 trails by 0.6% at 64,212. These deltas are tiny, indicating the RX 9060 XT LP lands in a tightly packed performance cluster.

The LX ULTRA, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, with no nearest rivals listed. That absence of recorded data means the comparison hinges on specifications rather than measured outcomes. On paper, the FP32 numbers are nearly identical, but the two cards diverge sharply in memory configuration, power draw, and feature set.

Architecture Differences

The RX 9060 XT LP uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 29,700 million transistors packed into a 199 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. It is built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The RX 9060 XT LP has a base clock of 1380 MHz, a boost clock of 3050 MHz, and a game clock of 2450 MHz. Its memory runs at 2518 MHz, or 20.1 Gbps effective. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock listed; only its memory clock is recorded at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. This means the AMD card has a significantly higher memory clock, but the LX ULTRA compensates with a wider memory bus.

Ray tracing hardware is present on the RX 9060 XT LP with 32 RT cores. The LX ULTRA has no RT core count listed in the database. Neither card lists tensor cores. In terms of API support, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9060 XT LP supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA is limited to Vulkan 1.3. The RX 9060 XT LP also supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning the same 24.99 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA supports FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS, more than double its FP32 rate.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9060 XT LP wins in raw FP32 compute, pixel fillrate, and texture fillrate, though by small margins. Its 24.99 TFLOPS FP32 output edges out the LX ULTRA's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its 195.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 390.4 GTexel/s texture rate both top the LX ULTRA's 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The AMD card also leads in memory clock speed at 20.1 Gbps effective versus 18 Gbps effective, and in bus interface, using PCIe 5.0 x16 against the LX ULTRA's PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 9060 XT LP has the advantage in ray tracing support with 32 dedicated RT cores, and it supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 API. It also draws substantially less power, with a 140 W TDP versus 225 W for the LX ULTRA, and requires a 300 W power supply versus 550 W. The RX 9060 XT LP is built on a smaller 4 nm process, which contributes to its efficiency advantage.

The LX ULTRA wins decisively in memory capacity and bandwidth. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 322.3 GB/s. That is a 34% bandwidth advantage for the LX ULTRA and 50% more memory capacity. The LX ULTRA also has far more shading units: 6144 versus 2048 for the RX 9060 XT LP. Its TMU count is 192 versus 128, and its ROP count is 96 versus 64. The LX ULTRA doubles the FP16 throughput of the AMD card, reaching 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.99 TFLOPS, which matters for workloads that can use mixed-precision math. It also has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RX 9060 XT LP has one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The LX ULTRA is larger physically, measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, whereas the RX 9060 XT LP has no dimensions recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification category. The RX 9060 XT LP uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm TSMC process with unknown transistor count and die size. Clock speeds: the RX 9060 XT LP has base, boost, and game clocks of 1380 MHz, 3050 MHz, and 2450 MHz respectively; the LX ULTRA has none recorded. Memory clocks: 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective) for the AMD card versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX ULTRA. Memory capacity: 16 GB versus 24 GB. Bus width: 128-bit versus 192-bit. Bandwidth: 322.3 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Shading units: 2048 versus 6144. TMUs: 128 versus 192. ROPs: 64 versus 96. RT cores: 32 versus none listed. FP32: 24.99 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 24.99 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP: 140 W versus 225 W. Power connectors: 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: 300 W versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support: 1.4 versus 1.3. The RX 9060 XT LP was released on 2025-12-16, while the LX ULTRA followed on 2026-03-16. Both are listed as Active in production status and both are dual-slot cards. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS FP32, slightly ahead of the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, three times the 2048 shading units of the RX 9060 XT LP, despite having nearly identical FP32 throughput.

Q: What are the power requirements of each card?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP has a 140 W TDP and requires a 300 W power supply with a single 8-pin connector. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W power supply with a single 16-pin connector.

Q: Which card supports ray tracing?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP includes 32 RT cores. The LX ULTRA has no RT core count recorded in the database.

Q: What API versions does each card support?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9060 XT LP supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.