AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has a complete set of ten benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This means the head-to-head analysis relies entirely on the RX 9060's measured performance and the LX MAX's theoretical specifications, with no direct comparison points available.

The RX 9060's strongest measured result comes from the Passmark G3D test, where it scores 17631 points. This places it in the 59th percentile against all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 16014 points. The nearest rival in the database, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, averages 16129 points, which puts the RX 9060 at a 0.7 percent deficit. The AMD Radeon R9 370X averages 15862 points, placing the RX 9060 at a 1 percent advantage. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 also averages 15852 points, again a 1 percent advantage for the RX 9060. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 averages 15679 points, giving the RX 9060 a 2.1 percent lead.

In compute-oriented workloads, the RX 9060 delivers an OpenCL score of 88183 in Geekbench, while its Vulkan score reaches 39476. The Passmark GPU compute test records 9919 points. These results indicate that the card handles both graphics and general-purpose compute tasks with measurable proficiency, though the lack of LX MAX data prevents any direct comparison.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, by contrast, has zero recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile rating against all GPUs, and an average benchmark score of 0. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark entries and no wins for either card. This is not a case of one card beating the other in specific tests; it is a case where one card has no empirical performance data at all.

What can be compared directly are the memory subsystems. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 9060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. Both cards run their memory at an effective 18 Gbps, but the LX MAX's wider bus gives it a 144 GB/s bandwidth advantage. The pixel rates are nearly identical: the LX MAX produces 192.0 GPixel/s while the RX 9060 produces 191.4 GPixel/s, a difference of less than 1 percent. The texture rates diverge more noticeably, with the LX MAX at 384.0 GTexel/s versus the RX 9060's 334.9 GTexel/s, a 14.7 percent advantage for the LX MAX.

The FP32 compute figures also favor the LX MAX on paper. It delivers 24.58 TFLOPS compared to the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS, a 14.7 percent gap. The FP16 comparison is more dramatic: the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 9060 delivers 21.43 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. This means the LX MAX has more than double the FP16 throughput, which could matter for workloads that leverage reduced precision.

The Verdict

The data does not support a conventional verdict. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has empirical results across ten benchmarks, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 16014 points sits within 1 percent of several established cards, including the RTX 3060 Ti, R9 370X, and RX 7700. Users looking for verified performance should rely on the RX 9060, as its measurements are recorded and reproducible.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark data, a 50th percentile rating, and an average score of 0. The database cannot confirm its real-world performance. Its specifications suggest higher memory capacity, greater bandwidth, and more compute throughput, but those figures remain unvalidated. Any decision involving the LX MAX depends on whether theoretical specifications are acceptable in place of measured results.

For users who require proven performance, the RX 9060 is the only card with data to analyze. For users who prioritize memory capacity and raw compute specifications, the LX MAX presents a compelling paper profile, but the absence of benchmarks carries significant uncertainty. The RX 9060's nearest rivals all cluster within 2.1 percent of its average score, indicating consistent, predictable behavior. The LX MAX offers no such reference points.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different manufacturing and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip based on RDNA 4.0 architecture, with the codename Strix Point. It belongs to the Navi IV generation within the RX 9000 series. The chip is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC and contains 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 149.2 million per square millimeter. The base clock runs at 1700 MHz, the boost clock reaches 2990 MHz, and the game clock sits at 2400 MHz.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip based on TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown. The base, boost, and game clocks are also unlisted, leaving only the memory clock at 2250 MHz effective 18 Gbps.

The RX 9060 packs 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The RX 9060 does not list tensor cores either. The LX MAX's shading unit count is 3.4 times higher, its TMU count is 1.7 times higher, and its ROP count is 1.5 times higher.

Power requirements differ substantially. The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested power supply of 300 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both cards are dual-slot designs.

The bus interfaces also differ. The RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs diverge as well: the RX 9060 offers one HDMI 2.1b port and two DisplayPort 2.1a ports, while the LX MAX provides four DisplayPort 1.4a ports. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RX 9060 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

The LX MAX has recorded physical dimensions: 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The RX 9060 has no dimensions listed. The RX 9060 was released on 2025-08-04 and is the predecessor to the Navi III series. The LX MAX was released on 2026-03-16 with no predecessor or successor listed. The RX 9060 has a production status of Active, and the LX MAX is also Active.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The LX MAX provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth through a 192-bit bus, while the RX 9060 provides 288.0 GB/s through a 128-bit bus, giving the LX MAX a 144 GB/s advantage.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. They differ on Vulkan support, with the RX 9060 supporting Vulkan 1.4 and the LX MAX supporting Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference?

A: The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the RX 9060 delivers 21.43 TFLOPS, a 14.7 percent advantage for the LX MAX.

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014 points across ten recorded tests. The LX MAX has an average score of 0, as no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: What is the power connector difference?

A: The RX 9060 uses a single 8-pin connector with a 132 W TDP and a suggested 300 W power supply. The LX MAX uses a single 16-pin connector with a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 wins in every category where measured performance exists. Its Passmark G3D score of 17631, Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 39476 provide concrete data points. Its Passmark GPU compute score of 9919 confirms general-purpose processing capability. The RX 9060 also wins on process technology, using a 4 nm node versus the LX MAX's 6 nm node, and on bus interface, with PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. It supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 API and offers DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, which are more advanced than the LX MAX's DisplayPort 1.4a.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on memory capacity and bandwidth, with 12 GB and 432.0 GB/s versus the RX 9060's 8 GB and 288.0 GB/s. It wins on shading unit count, with 6144 versus 1792, and on texture mapping units, with 192 versus 112. Its ROP count of 96 exceeds the RX 9060's 64. The LX MAX produces a higher texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s and a higher FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS more than doubles the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS. The LX MAX also delivers a marginally higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 191.4 GPixel/s.

The RX 9060 wins on power efficiency, with a 132 W TDP versus the LX MAX's 225 W, and on power supply requirements, suggesting 300 W versus 550 W. The RX 9060 also has a known transistor count and die size, while the LX MAX lists both as unknown. The RX 9060 has ray tracing cores, with 28 available, while the LX MAX lists none.

In practical terms, the RX 9060 wins on verified performance, efficiency, and modern feature support. The LX MAX wins on memory capacity, bandwidth, and raw compute specifications, but without benchmark results, those advantages remain theoretical. The database shows no head-to-head wins for either card because no head-to-head tests were recorded. Users choosing between these cards must weigh the RX 9060's measured results against the LX MAX's unverified specifications.