AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the only one of these two parts with recorded benchmark results in the database; the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries at all, so the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The RX 9060 posts an average benchmark score of 16014, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs tracked. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, holds an average score of 16129, which puts the AMD card 0.7% behind. The RX 9060 also sits 1% above the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862) and 1% above the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852), while leading the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679) by 2.1%.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 9060 scores 3322. Geekbench OpenCL results show 88183, while the Vulkan test returns 39476. Passmark results are more mixed across API generations: DirectX 9 scores 280, DirectX 10 scores 104, DirectX 11 scores 182, and DirectX 12 scores 44. The Passmark G2D score is 1002, G3D is 17631, and GPU compute is 9919. These numbers confirm that the RX 9060 is a capable discrete card with strong compute throughput, but the Arc Pro B370 cannot be compared directly because no benchmark data exists for it in the database.

The Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals recorded, placing it at the 50th percentile by default. The data shows that any direct comparison of performance metrics between these two products is currently impossible; the only meaningful statements come from the RX 9060's standalone results and its position relative to other discrete GPUs. The RX 9060 sits within a tight cluster of competing cards, all within roughly 2 percentage points of each other, which indicates that its performance class is well established. The Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no measured performance footprint in the database at all.

Architecture Differences

The two products come from different manufacturing processes. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel. The RX 9060 is built on the Navi 44 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture and the Strix Point codename, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. The Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. The RX 9060 packs 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The Arc Pro B370's transistor count and die size are unknown in the database.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The RX 9060 has a base clock of 1700 MHz, a boost clock of 2990 MHz, and a game clock of 2400 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of just 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory configurations are fundamentally different: the RX 9060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory, with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM.

The compute resources also differ significantly. The RX 9060 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate for the RX 9060 is 191.4 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro B370. Texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 21.43 TFLOPS for the AMD part, while the Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1) on the RX 9060, while the Arc Pro B370 reaches 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical design are also in different categories. The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W, uses a dual-slot design, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W PSU. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, and uses an IGP bus interface. Display outputs for the RX 9060 are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a; the Arc Pro B370's outputs are portable-device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 9060 was released on 2025-08-04, while the Arc Pro B370 has a release date of 2026-01-26. The RX 9060's predecessor is Navi III; the Arc Pro B370's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9060 wins in every measurable category because it is the only product with data. Its G3D score of 17631 and GPU compute score of 9919 indicate strong general 3D rendering and compute workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 suggests robust compute performance in OpenCL applications, while the Vulkan score of 39476 confirms solid cross-platform graphics API performance. The DirectX 12 score of 44 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 182, which may indicate that the card's DX12 performance in Passmark's specific test is less impressive relative to its other API results. The DirectX 9 score of 280 is the highest among the Passmark DirectX tests, and the DirectX 10 score of 104 lands in the middle.

The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded wins, but its architecture suggests a different role. As a 25 W integrated GPU with system-shared memory, it is designed for portable devices and low-power systems. Its FP16 output of 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) is double its FP32 output of 6.144 TFLOPS, which indicates that the architecture is tuned for workloads that benefit from half-precision math. The RX 9060's FP16 and FP32 are equal at 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1), so the AMD card does not gain a throughput advantage from half-precision operations, while the Intel part does. The Arc Pro B370's base clock of 300 MHz is extremely low, which likely reflects aggressive power-saving behavior in an integrated context.

In terms of raw throughput, the RX 9060 is decisively ahead: it has roughly 3.5 times the FP32 throughput, 4 times the pixel rate, 3.5 times the texture rate, and 2.8 times the shading units of the Arc Pro B370. The RX 9060 also has 2.8 times the ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370's only structural advantage is its far lower power envelope at 25 W versus 132 W and its integrated nature, which eliminates the need for a separate power connector or discrete slot. The RX 9060's higher ROP count (64 versus 20) and TMU count (112 versus 40) reinforce its lead in fill-rate-limited scenarios.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear separation of roles. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a discrete, performance-oriented card with measured results that place it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 16014 puts it within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, and it leads the AMD Radeon R9 370X, RX 7700, and Pro W5500 by 1%, 1%, and 2.1% respectively. Buyers in the market for a discrete GPU with dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 128-bit bus, and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth should consider the RX 9060 as a mid-pack option that trades blows with its nearest rivals.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated GPU with no benchmark entries, no nearest rivals, and no average score. Its 25 W TDP, IGP form factor, and system-shared memory indicate that it is intended for compact, low-power portable devices rather than desktop performance builds. The RX 9060's 132 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 8-pin connector place it in a completely different power and physical class. The Arc Pro B370's 3 nm process at Intel gives it a process-node advantage over the RX 9060's 4 nm TSMC node, but the database contains no performance data to translate that architectural edge into measured wins.

From the recorded data, the RX 9060 is the only product with verified performance, and it should be selected by anyone needing a discrete GPU with established benchmark results. The Arc Pro B370 is appropriate for systems that require an integrated solution with minimal power draw, but its performance cannot be quantified from the database. The RX 9060's release date of 2025-08-04 predates the Arc Pro B370's 2026-01-26 release, so the Intel part is newer, but newness alone does not translate into measured superiority given the absence of benchmark data. The RX 9060's percentile rank of 59 versus the Arc Pro B370's 50 reinforces the AMD card's stronger standing in the overall GPU landscape.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% behind the RTX 3060 Ti's average score of 16129. The two cards are effectively in the same performance tier.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The Arc Pro B370 has an empty benchmarks list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals recorded. Its percentile rank of 50 is a default value rather than a measured result.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each product?

A: The RX 9060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which product has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The RX 9060 delivers 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The AMD card has roughly 3.5 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: What is the power draw difference between the two products?

A: The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 300 W PSU. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, uses no power connectors, and is an integrated graphics processor.

Q: What process nodes do the two products use?

A: The RX 9060 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel. The RX 9060 packs 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die; the Arc Pro B370's transistor count and die size are unknown in the database.