AMD Radeon RX 7800M vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Radeon RX 7800M and the Intel Arc Pro B370 presents an unusual comparison scenario. The AMD part has a complete set of benchmark results across multiple test suites, totaling ten recorded scores. The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50. This absence of data for the Intel part means there is no direct head-to-head benchmark comparison available, and the wins count for both parts is 0.

However, the available data for the AMD Radeon RX 7800M can be interpreted against its own nearest rivals. The AMD part's average benchmark score is 27883, which places it in the 73rd percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, with an average score of 27839, a delta of 0.2%. This indicates a virtual tie, with the RX 7800M being 0.2% ahead of that rival. The next nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X, scores 27973, putting the RX 7800M 0.3% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 28020, making the RX 7800M 0.5% behind. The AMD FirePro S7150 scores 28117, making the RX 7800M 0.8% behind. These extremely narrow deltas, all within a 1% band, show that the RX 7800M's overall average score sits almost exactly at the midpoint of this small cluster of competing GPUs.

Looking at the individual benchmark scores for the RX 7800M, the data shows a wide range of results across different test types. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 2994. In Geekbench OpenCL, the score is 120778, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it is 126668. The Passmark suite shows scores of 99 for DirectX 10, 176 for DirectX 11, 89 for DirectX 12, and 174 for DirectX 9. The Passmark G2D score is 892, the Passmark G3D score is 17613, and the Passmark GPU Compute score is 9342. These figures indicate that the RX 7800M delivers a strong compute performance profile, particularly in the Geekbench tests, while the Passmark DirectX scores are relatively lower. The absence of any Intel Arc Pro B370 benchmark scores means the database contains no comparative performance data between the two products.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each part?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M has an average benchmark score of 27883. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0, as it has no recorded benchmark results in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7800M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7800M is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, which has an average score of 27839. It is 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X (27973), 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (28020), and 0.8% behind the AMD FirePro S7150 (28117).

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each part versus all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is in the 73rd percentile versus all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is in the 50th percentile versus all GPUs.

Q: Which part has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M has a boost clock of 2335 MHz. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz, which is 65 MHz higher.

Q: What is the memory configuration for each part?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses System Shared memory, with a bus width and bandwidth that are System Shared and System Dependent, respectively.

Q: What are the process nodes for each part?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is manufactured on a 3 nm process by Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M and the Intel Arc Pro B370 differ fundamentally in their underlying architectures. The RX 7800M uses the Navi 32 chip based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Wheat Nas" and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. In contrast, the Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation.

The process nodes also differ. The RX 7800M is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc Pro B370 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel. The RX 7800M integrates 28,100 million transistors on a die size of 346 mm², giving a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The Arc Pro B370 has an unknown transistor count, die size, and transistor density.

The execution resource configurations are markedly different. The RX 7800M has 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 raster operation units (ROPs). It also has 60 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, along with 10 ray tracing cores. This means the RX 7800M has three times the shading units, six times the TMUs, and nearly five times the ROPs of the Arc Pro B370.

Memory architecture separates the two as well. The RX 7800M uses dedicated 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The Arc Pro B370 uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated video memory; its bus width is System Shared and its bandwidth is System Dependent. This is a core architectural difference: one part has its own memory pool, while the other relies on system memory.

The clock behavior also reflects the design disparity. The RX 7800M has a base clock of 1295 MHz, a boost clock of 2335 MHz, and a game clock of 2145 MHz. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock specified and a memory clock listed as System Shared.

Compute throughput figures highlight the performance gap in raw numbers. The RX 7800M delivers a pixel rate of 224.2 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 560.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance of 35.87 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance is 35.87 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The Arc Pro B370 delivers a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The RX 7800M is therefore about 5.8 times faster in FP32 and 2.9 times faster in FP16, while its pixel and texture rates are roughly 4.7 and 5.8 times higher, respectively.

Both parts share the same API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are integrated graphics packages (IGP) with no power connectors. The RX 7800M has a TDP of 180 W, while the Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, a seven-fold difference. The bus interface for the RX 7800M is PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc Pro B370 uses IGP.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7800M is a high-performance mobile GPU with a substantial set of recorded results, placing it in the 73rd percentile versus all GPUs. Its average score of 27883 puts it in very close competition with several professional and older high-end desktop parts, with deltas under 1% against its nearest rivals. The RX 7800M delivers strong compute throughput with FP32 at 35.87 TFLOPS and a large dedicated memory pool of 12 GB GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This makes it suited for demanding workloads where dedicated VRAM and high compute throughput are required.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, with no recorded benchmark scores and an average of 0, cannot be quantitatively assessed against the RX 7800M in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking versus all GPUs is a mid-tier position, but without actual scores, this ranking has no supporting measurement. The Arc Pro B370 is a 25 W integrated part with system-shared memory, a much lower transistor and execution resource count, and significantly lower compute throughput figures. Its FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS and shared memory architecture position it as a low-power integrated solution, not a discrete-class competitor.

The data shows the RX 7800M is the only part with measurable performance in the database. Its architecture, with 3840 shading units and 60 ray tracing cores, is designed for high-end mobile gaming and compute. The Arc Pro B370, with 1280 shading units and 10 ray tracing cores, presents a much more limited execution resource profile. Given the absence of benchmark data for the Arc Pro B370, the database cannot support any comparison of actual performance between the two. Based strictly on the recorded data, the RX 7800M is the part with verified performance characteristics, while the Arc Pro B370's performance remains undocumented.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The process node differs: the AMD Radeon RX 7800M is 5 nm, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 is 3 nm. The chip differs: Navi 32 for AMD versus Panther Lake for Intel. The architecture differs: RDNA 3.0 versus Xe3-LPG. The generation differs: Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) versus Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake).

Transistor count and die size are known for the RX 7800M (28,100 million and 346 mm²) but unknown for the Arc Pro B370. The transistor density is 81.2M per mm² for the RX 7800M and null for the Arc Pro B370.

Clock speeds differ: base clock is 1295 MHz for the RX 7800M versus 300 MHz for the Arc Pro B370. Boost clock is 2335 MHz versus 2400 MHz. Game clock is 2145 MHz for the RX 7800M and null for the Arc Pro B370. Memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RX 7800M and System Shared for the Arc Pro B370.

Memory configuration differs completely: the RX 7800M has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Arc Pro B370 has System Shared memory, System Shared bus width, and System Dependent bandwidth.

Shading units are 3840 versus 1280. TMUs are 240 versus 40. ROPs are 96 versus 20. Ray tracing cores are 60 versus 10. Pixel rate is 224.2 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 560.4 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 is 35.87 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS. FP16 is 35.87 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP is 180 W for the RX 7800M and 25 W for the Arc Pro B370. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RX 7800M and IGP for the Arc Pro B370. Release dates differ: the RX 7800M was released on 2024-09-10, and the Arc Pro B370 on 2026-01-26. The predecessor for the RX 7800M is Polaris Mobile, while the Arc Pro B370's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. Both have a production status of Active. Both are IGP with no power connectors, and both have display outputs listed as Portable Device Dependent.