AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Intel Arc Pro B370

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in any of the standard test suites, while the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has a full set of measurements. This absence of comparable data points creates an unusual analytical situation: the comparison must rely entirely on the recorded performance profile of the AMD part and the architectural specifications of the Intel part.

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT shows a substantial performance footprint across multiple DirectX generations. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4157 indicates strong modern API performance. In Geekbench, the card records 18290 in OpenCL and 54228 in Vulkan, with the Vulkan result more than double the OpenCL figure, suggesting particularly efficient low-level API utilization. PassMark results show a G3D score of 24176, a GPU compute score of 13473, and legacy API scores of 304 for DirectX 9, 249 for DirectX 11, 121 for DirectX 10, and 93 for DirectX 12. The DirectX 9 score being the highest among the legacy tests is notable, as it indicates the architecture handles older workloads effectively despite its modern design.

The average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is 11627 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs in the database is 51, placing it slightly above the median. The nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with an average score of 11680 (a delta of -0.5%), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M at 11528 (delta of 0.9%), the NVIDIA Tesla K20c at 11479 (delta of 1.3%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT at 11842 (delta of -1.8%). These deltas are remarkably tight, all within a 3% band, which means the RX 7800 XT sits in a densely populated performance cluster despite its high absolute scores in individual tests.

The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and zero recorded measurements. Its percentile ranking is 50, which is a neutral placeholder rather than an earned position. The nearest rivals list is empty. This means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for the Intel part through direct testing; all conclusions about its capabilities must be drawn from its listed specifications, which are substantial in some areas but limited in others.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, the recorded data shows wins across every benchmark category where measurements exist. The PassMark G3D score of 24176 is the highest single result in its profile, indicating strong overall 3D rendering performance. The GPU compute score of 13473 shows competent general-purpose compute capabilities. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 54228 versus the OpenCL score of 18290 reveals that the card excels in Vulkan workloads, which are common in modern games and graphics applications. The DirectX 9 score of 304 being the top legacy result suggests the card handles older game engines well, which is relevant for backward compatibility in large game libraries.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no measured wins in the database. Its specifications indicate potential strengths that cannot be verified: a 25 W TDP versus the AMD card's 263 W TDP suggests dramatically lower power consumption, and its 3 nm process node from Intel Foundry implies a modern manufacturing approach. However, without benchmark results, the database cannot confirm whether these architectural advantages translate into competitive performance. The Intel part's memory configuration is listed as "System Shared" with "System Dependent" bandwidth, which means its performance is tied to the host system's memory subsystem rather than dedicated VRAM, a fundamental difference that likely limits its peak throughput in memory-intensive workloads.

The AMD card's 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 256-bit bus width and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth gives it a clear advantage in scenarios requiring large data sets or high memory throughput. The Intel part's shared memory approach means it competes for bandwidth with the CPU and other system components, which typically disadvantages graphics workloads. The recorded data supports the conclusion that the AMD card wins in every measured category, while the Intel card's wins would exist only in unmeasured areas such as power efficiency per watt, which the database does not quantify.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT uses the Navi 32 chip built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on a 3 nm process at Intel Foundry, with Xe3-LPG architecture. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and it belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation.

The compute configurations differ sharply. The AMD card has 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation units, and 60 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The AMD card's pixel rate is 233.3 GPixel/s and texture rate is 583.2 GTexel/s, while the Intel part manages 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 37.32 TFLOPS for AMD versus 6.144 TFLOPS for Intel. The FP16 figures show a notable difference in ratio: AMD delivers 37.32 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while Intel provides 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning Intel's FP16 performance is double its FP32, which could benefit certain AI or compute workloads.

Clock speeds reveal different strategies. The AMD card runs at a base clock of 1295 MHz, a boost clock of 2430 MHz, and a game clock of 2124 MHz, with memory clocked at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective). The Intel part has a very low base clock of 300 MHz but a boost clock of 2400 MHz, indicating a wide dynamic range that likely correlates with its low 25 W TDP. The AMD card's memory operates at 19.5 Gbps effective, while the Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated bandwidth figure.

The AMD card is a dual-slot discrete GPU with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and no suggested PSU, consuming only 25 W. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface. Display outputs differ as well: AMD provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while Intel's outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," indicating it is designed for mobile or embedded systems.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The production status for both is Active. The AMD card was released on 2023-09-05 with a predecessor of Navi II and a successor of Navi IV. The Intel part was released on 2026-01-26 with a predecessor of HD Graphics-WM and no listed successor. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 499 USD, while the Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and an empty nearest rivals list. The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has ten recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and PassMark suites.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the host system's memory.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has a TDP of 263 W with dual-slot cooling and 2x 8-pin power connectors, requiring a 600 W suggested PSU. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 and 37.32 TFLOPS FP16. The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16. The AMD card is 6.07 times higher in FP32 and 3.04 times higher in FP16.

Q: Are the API feature levels the same?

A: Yes, both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means they should handle the same modern graphics APIs, though actual performance will differ based on hardware capabilities.

Q: What is the release timeline difference?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT was released on 2023-09-05, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 was released on 2026-01-26, a gap of roughly two years and four months. The AMD part has a predecessor (Navi II) and successor (Navi IV), while the Intel part has a predecessor (HD Graphics-WM) and no successor.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a one-sided comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT demonstrates measurable performance across all benchmark categories, with an average score of 11627 and a 51st percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1.8% delta, indicating it sits in a competitive performance band. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks, making any performance claim unverifiable from the database.

For users who require discrete graphics performance in gaming or compute workloads, the AMD card is the only option with empirical support. Its 16 GB of dedicated memory, 624.1 GB/s bandwidth, and 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are concrete advantages. The Intel part's 25 W TDP and 3 nm process suggest it targets a different use case: integrated graphics for portable or low-power systems. Its system shared memory and IGP bus interface confirm this positioning.

The architecture comparison shows why these GPUs serve different purposes. The AMD card is a full-size discrete solution with 346 mm² die area and 28,100 million transistors. The Intel part is an IGP with unknown transistor count and die size, designed to fit within a processor package. The clock ranges differ dramatically: AMD's base clock is 1295 MHz versus Intel's 300 MHz, though boost clocks are closer at 2430 MHz versus 2400 MHz.

The release dates also reflect different market timing. The AMD card launched in September 2023, while the Intel part is dated January 2026. The Intel part belongs to a newer generation with a smaller process node, but the database cannot confirm whether this translates into competitive performance because no measurements exist.

Users seeking a discrete GPU with verified benchmark results should choose the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT. Users requiring an integrated graphics solution with minimal power draw should consider the Intel Arc Pro B370, but they must accept that its performance is unquantified in the database. The data does not support any scenario where the Intel part outperforms the AMD card in measured workloads, but the different form factors and power envelopes suggest they are not direct competitors in most usage scenarios.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | Intel Arc Pro B370 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 32 | Panther Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe3-LPG |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2430 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2124 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps) | System Shared |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus | 256 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 624.1 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 3840 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 240 | 40 |

| ROPs | 96 | 20 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 10 |

| Pixel Rate | 233.3 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 583.2 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 37.32 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 37.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 263 W | 25 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | null |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Dimensions | 267 mm x 111 mm x 50 mm | null |

| Release Date | 2023-09-05 | 2026-01-26 |

| Predecessor | Navi II | HD Graphics-WM |

| Successor | Navi IV | null |

| Launch MSRP | 499 USD | null |