AMD Radeon RX 7700S vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7700S compare to the Lisuan Tech LX MAX in raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a higher FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS compared to the RX 7700S at 20.48 TFLOPS, a difference of about 20%. The LX MAX also leads in FP16 with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 40.96 TFLOPS.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX offers 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6, while the RX 7700S provides 288.0 GB/s on a 128-bit bus with 8 GB. The LX MAX delivers 50% more bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two cards?

A: The RX 7700S has a TDP of 100 W and uses no power connectors, being an integrated graphics package (IGP). The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API feature levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7700S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What do the benchmark percentiles indicate for each GPU?

A: The RX 7700S sits in the 78th percentile of all GPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of 33,849. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmarks and sits in the 50th percentile with an average score of 0.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RX 7700S uses 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7700S is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish". It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M series) and is manufactured by AMD on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a chip designated 7G106 with the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. Its manufacturer is listed as Unknown. It is also built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database. The LX MAX is a dual-slot, discrete card with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RX 7700S is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with display outputs described as portable device dependent.

The RX 7700S has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature that is not listed for the LX MAX. The LX MAX relies on a larger pool of generic compute resources: 6,144 shading units versus 2,048 on the RX 7700S, which is a 3x difference. Texture units also favor the LX MAX at 192 versus 128, and ROPs at 96 versus 64.

Both cards use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, and both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The RX 7700S has no power connectors and is rated at 100 W, whereas the LX MAX requires a 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, with a 225 W TDP. The LX MAX is physically larger, measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7700S and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither card records a win in a direct comparison.

What can be compared is the RX 7700S's measured performance against the database's full GPU population. The RX 7700S scores 2,185 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 62,983 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 36,380 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 33,849, which places it in the 78th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the AMD Radeon HD 7950 at 33,951 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 480 at 33,997 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB at 33,694 (+0.5%), and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 at 33,622 (+0.7%). These deltas are all within one percent, which indicates the RX 7700S's average score is tightly clustered with those four cards.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50. The nearest rivals list for the LX MAX is empty, so there is no measured data to position it against other GPUs. The absence of benchmark data means its theoretical specifications cannot be validated against actual performance in the database.

The FP32 and FP16 figures can be compared directly as computed values. The LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 is 4.10 TFLOPS higher than the RX 7700S's 20.48 TFLOPS, a 20% advantage. The LX MAX's 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 is 8.19 TFLOPS higher than the RX 7700S's 40.96 TFLOPS, also a 20% advantage. The LX MAX also has a higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 160.0 GPixel/s, and a higher texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 320.0 GTexel/s.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7700S | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2,048 | 6,144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 32 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 160.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 320.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 20.48 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 40.96 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 100 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Length | null | 248 mm |

| Height | null | 118 mm |

| Width | null | 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2026-03-16 |

The two GPUs share the 6 nm TSMC process, GDDR6 memory type, 2250 MHz memory clock with 18 Gbps effective speed, PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), and OpenGL 4.6 support. The LX MAX is larger in every physical dimension and requires external power, while the RX 7700S operates without any power connector. The LX MAX's release date is over three years later than the RX 7700S.

The Verdict

The data positions the AMD Radeon RX 7700S as a measured, validated GPU with an average benchmark score of 33,849 and a 78th percentile rank across all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all within one percent of its average score, show that it performs at the level of the AMD Radeon RX 480 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. The RX 7700S is a mobile-class part with a 100 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP form factor, which means it targets portable devices with constrained power budgets.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX presents a different profile. It has no benchmark scores in the database, so its 50th percentile rank and average score of 0 reflect missing data rather than measured performance. Its specifications, however, indicate a substantially higher compute ceiling: 3x the shading units, 50% more memory bandwidth, and 20% more FP32 throughput. The LX MAX is a dual-slot desktop card with a 225 W TDP, a 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU, so it is designed for a full desktop power envelope rather than mobile integration.

The verdict follows directly from the recorded data. For users with a portable device or a strict power limit, the RX 7700S is the only viable option, and its benchmark scores confirm it operates at a known performance level. For a desktop system with a 550 W PSU, the LX MAX offers the higher theoretical throughput and more memory, but the database contains no measurements to verify how that specification translates into real application performance.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Radeon RX 7700S wins on validated performance and efficiency. Its 78th percentile rank is backed by three recorded benchmark scores: 2,185 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 62,983 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 36,380 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its 100 W TDP with no power connector requirement makes it suitable for integrated, portable designs. It also has 32 ray tracing cores, a feature the LX MAX does not list, and supports Vulkan 1.4 versus the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3.

Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on raw specification headroom. It offers 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. Its shading unit count of 6,144 is three times higher, and its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7700S by 20%. The LX MAX also has higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 160.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 320.0 GTexel/s). It provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor desktop setups.

The RX 7700S wins in any scenario where power consumption and form factor are the constraints. The LX MAX wins in scenarios where memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and raw compute throughput are the primary requirements. The absence of benchmark data for the LX MAX means its specification advantage remains unverified in the database.