AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the core architectural difference between the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX?

A: The RX 7700 XT uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 3456 shading units. The LX MAX has nearly twice the shader count.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: Both cards use 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective memory clocks. Memory specifications are identical.

Q: What are the FP32 compute ratings for each card?

A: The RX 7700 XT delivers 35.17 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The AMD card has a 43% higher FP32 rating despite having fewer shading units.

Q: Which card has more display outputs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

Q: What is the power draw for each card?

A: The RX 7700 XT has a TDP of 245 W and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. Both require a 550 W suggested PSU.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and Lisuan Tech LX MAX diverge sharply in their underlying designs. The RX 7700 XT uses the Navi 32 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated at 5 nm by TSMC. Its die measures 346 mm² and contains 28,100 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but at 6 nm. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The shading unit counts tell a different story than the compute numbers. The LX MAX packs 6144 shading units against the RX 7700 XT's 3456. However, the RX 7700 XT counters with 216 texture mapping units versus 192 on the LX MAX, while both cards have 96 ROPs. The RX 7700 XT includes 54 ray tracing cores; the LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing core count. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Clock behavior is another major differentiator. The RX 7700 XT has recorded base, boost, and game clocks of 1435 MHz, 2544 MHz, and 2171 MHz respectively. The LX MAX has no recorded clock speeds in the database. This explains the compute gap: the RX 7700 XT achieves 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 and a 1:1 FP16 ratio, while the LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 but doubles to 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

Feature support also differs. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7700 XT supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Display connectivity is distinct: the RX 7700 XT offers HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, and USB Type-C, while the LX MAX provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Physical dimensions differ as well. The RX 7700 XT measures 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. The LX MAX is smaller at 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores at all, with an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty benchmark array. The RX 7700 XT, by contrast, has a substantial set of recorded results across multiple test suites.

The RX 7700 XT scores 3316 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. In Geekbench, it records 138383 in OpenCL and 46443 in Vulkan. Passmark results show 119 in DirectX 10, 232 in DirectX 11, 79 in DirectX 12, 294 in DirectX 9, 1161 in G2D, 22547 in G3D, and 12912 in GPU compute. Its average benchmark score is 22549, placing it in the 67th percentile among all GPUs.

Because the LX MAX has no recorded performance data, the RX 7700 XT holds all database wins by default. The AMD card's nearest rivals provide context for its standing: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile averages 22435, a 0.5% delta; the RTX 4060 Mobile averages 22729, a -0.8% delta; the RTX 2080 averages 22895, a -1.5% delta; and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 averages 22170, a 1.7% delta. These deltas show the RX 7700 XT sits in a tightly packed performance cluster, with all four rivals within 1.7% of its average score.

The LX MAX's percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs is recorded, but with no benchmark data behind it, this figure cannot be verified against actual test results. The RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile is supported by its full suite of measurements.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a one-sided comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has a complete benchmark profile with an average score of 22549, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded scores at all. Any selection between these two cards must account for that absence of evidence.

From the compute perspective, the RX 7700 XT leads in FP32 with 35.17 TFLOPS against the LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS. It also leads in texture rate, 549.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, and pixel rate, 244.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. The RX 7700 XT includes ray tracing cores, which the LX MAX does not list. The AMD card also supports Vulkan 1.4, one version ahead of the LX MAX's 1.3.

The LX MAX has advantages in the recorded specifications. Its 6144 shading units exceed the RX 7700 XT's 3456, and its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS more than doubles the RX 7700 XT's 35.17 TFLOPS FP16. The LX MAX also draws less power, 225 W against 245 W, and uses a single 16-pin connector instead of two 8-pin connectors. Its physical footprint is smaller in all three dimensions.

The RX 7700 XT has a recorded launch MSRP of 449 USD. The LX MAX has no launch MSRP recorded.

For users prioritizing verified performance, the RX 7700 XT is the only card with benchmark results in the database. Its 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs, combined with its compute and rate advantages, positions it as the measured performer. For users prioritizing raw shader count, FP16 compute, lower power draw, or a compact physical design, the LX MAX presents those specifications, but no recorded test results confirm how they translate into real performance.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 32 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 81.2M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 1435 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2544 MHz | null |

| Game Clock | 2171 MHz | null |

| Shading Units | 3456 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 216 | 192 |

| ROPs | 96 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 54 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 35.17 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 245 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |

| Height | 135 mm | 118 mm |

| Width | 50 mm | 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-09-05 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 449 USD | null |

| Average Benchmark Score | 22549 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 67 | 50 |

The shared specifications include 12 GB GDDR6 memory, 192-bit bus width, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective memory clock, PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, dual-slot width, 550 W suggested PSU, and an Active production status. The RX 7700 XT lists Wheat Nas as its codename and Navi II as predecessor, while the LX MAX has no codename, predecessor, or successor recorded.