AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither product records a win against the other in direct testing. However, the aggregate performance data available for each part allows for a meaningful comparison of their expected performance tiers.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE holds a percentile rank of 83 among all GPUs tracked in the database, indicating it places in the top 17% of all recorded graphics hardware. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, by contrast, holds a percentile rank of 50, placing it exactly at the median of all recorded GPUs. This percentile gap alone suggests a substantial performance separation between the two parts, with the AMD solution positioned well above the midpoint of the performance distribution.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE records an average benchmark score of 42,723 across all tests in the database. This places it in close proximity to several NVIDIA parts, including the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER which scores 43,223, the Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43,262, the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43,268, and the Quadro M6000 at 43,301. The deltas against these rivals are all negative and tightly clustered: -1.2% against the RTX 4070 SUPER, -1.2% against the Quadro M6000 24 GB, -1.3% against the RTX 5050 Mobile, and -1.3% against the Quadro M6000. This indicates that the RX 7650 GRE sits within a narrow performance band, trailing these four NVIDIA parts by roughly one to one-and-a-half percent in aggregate score.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile records an average benchmark score of zero and has no nearest rivals listed in the database. Its percentile rank of 50, however, confirms that it is not a zero-performance part; it simply has no aggregate benchmark score populated in the database, likely due to a lack of recorded results or the nature of its mobile integrated positioning.

In the two individual benchmark results recorded for the Radeon RX 7650 GRE, the part scores 2,336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 83,109 in Geekbench OpenCL. These figures provide concrete reference points for its performance in those specific workloads, though no corresponding Intel results exist in the database for direct comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs differ fundamentally in their architecture, process technology, and design intent. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip under the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi III generation within the Radeon RX 7000 series. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses the Xe-LPG architecture, based on the Meteor Lake chip, and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake) generation.

Manufacturing processes diverge sharply. The AMD part is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, while the Intel part is fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process node. The AMD chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip has no transistor count or die size data recorded in the database.

Compute resources differ by a wide margin. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE includes 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile includes 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. It has no dedicated ray tracing core count listed in the database.

The AMD part has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. Its memory operates at 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The Intel part has a base clock of just 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. It does not list a game clock, and its memory is designated as "System Shared" with no dedicated frequency.

Memory configuration represents another major architectural division. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and system-dependent bandwidth. This means the Intel part relies entirely on the host system's memory subsystem, while the AMD part carries dedicated VRAM.

Pixel and texture throughput rates reflect the resource disparity. The AMD part achieves a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s. The Intel part achieves 52.80 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance shows a similar gap: the AMD part delivers 22.08 TFLOPS for FP32 and the same 22.08 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part delivers 3.942 TFLOPS for FP32 and 7.885 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

API support also differs. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The difference in DirectX feature level, 12_2 versus 12_1, indicates the AMD part supports a higher tier of DirectX 12 features.

Power and physical specifications diverge as well. The AMD part has a TDP of 170 W, uses a dual-slot form factor, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The Intel part has a TDP of 65 W, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP), does not list power connectors or a suggested power supply, and uses a ring bus interface rather than a PCIe connection. The AMD part connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel part uses the ring bus, reflecting its mobile integrated nature.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates a decisive performance hierarchy between these two parts. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, with a percentile rank of 83 and an average benchmark score of 42,723, sits in the upper quartile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, with a percentile rank of 50, sits at the median. The AMD part trails the nearest NVIDIA rivals by only 1.2% to 1.3% in aggregate score, placing it in a competitive segment alongside parts like the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile.

The Intel part's lack of an aggregate benchmark score and absence of nearest rivals in the database limits direct quantitative comparison, but its lower percentile rank and significantly lower compute specifications indicate it occupies a lower performance tier. The AMD part delivers roughly 5.6 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel part, based on the recorded 22.08 TFLOPS versus 3.942 TFLOPS. Its texture rate is about 2.8 times higher, and its pixel rate is over three times higher.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a discrete, dual-slot, 170 W desktop-oriented graphics card with 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is a 65 W integrated GPU that shares system memory, designed for mobile platforms. The architectural data makes clear that the AMD part is built for sustained, high-throughput rendering workloads, while the Intel part is optimized for power efficiency within a mobile processor package.

For users seeking maximum graphics performance in a discrete card form factor, the data points to the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. For users constrained to a mobile integrated solution, the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile provides a baseline level of 3D capability, but the recorded specifications place it well below the AMD part in every compute metric.

FAQ

Q: What is the percentile rank of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE holds a percentile rank of 83 among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile holds a percentile rank of 50.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile delivers 3.942 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: What process nodes are used for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process node.

Q: Which DirectX versions do the two GPUs support?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a TDP of 65 W.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins decisively across all recorded performance metrics. Its average benchmark score of 42,723 places it within 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, the Quadro M6000 24 GB, the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, and the Quadro M6000. This indicates the AMD part delivers performance in the upper tier of recorded GPUs, making it suitable for demanding desktop rendering workloads where high frame rates and detailed graphics are required.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 65 W TDP is substantially lower than the AMD part's 170 W TDP. It is an integrated graphics processor, meaning it requires no separate slot space, no power connectors, and no dedicated power supply recommendation. For mobile platforms where battery life and thermal constraints are paramount, the Intel part offers a built-in graphics solution without additional hardware requirements.

The AMD part also wins in memory bandwidth and dedicated video memory capacity. With 8 GB of GDDR6 and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, it can handle high-resolution textures and large datasets without relying on system memory. The Intel part's system-shared memory approach is dependent on the host system's memory configuration, which may introduce variability in performance.

In compute throughput, the AMD part wins by a wide margin across FP32, FP16, texture rate, and pixel rate. Its 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, 22.08 TFLOPS FP16, 345.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate far exceed the Intel part's 3.942 TFLOPS FP32, 7.885 TFLOPS FP16, 123.2 GTexel/s, and 52.80 GPixel/s.

The Intel part wins in API compatibility in one specific regard: it does not require the same power delivery infrastructure as the AMD part, making it easier to integrate into constrained mobile designs. It also uses a ring bus interface, which is appropriate for its integrated role within a Meteor Lake processor package.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two GPUs, based on recorded data:

• Architecture: AMD uses RDNA 3.0; Intel uses Xe-LPG.
• Chip: AMD uses Navi 33; Intel uses Meteor Lake.
• Generation: AMD is Navi III (RX 7000); Intel is Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake).
• Process Node: AMD uses 6 nm (TSMC); Intel uses 10 nm (Intel).
• Foundry: AMD uses TSMC; Intel uses Intel.
• Transistors: AMD has 13,300 million; Intel has no recorded value.
• Die Size: AMD has 204 mm²; Intel has no recorded value.
• Transistor Density: AMD has 65.2M / mm²; Intel has no recorded value.
• Base Clock: AMD is 1720 MHz; Intel is 300 MHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD is 2695 MHz; Intel is 2200 MHz.
• Game Clock: AMD is 2350 MHz; Intel has no recorded value.
• Memory Clock: AMD is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective); Intel is system-shared.
• Memory Size: AMD is 8 GB; Intel is system-shared.
• Memory Type: AMD is GDDR6; Intel is system-shared.
• Memory Bus Width: AMD is 128 bit; Intel is system-shared.
• Memory Bandwidth: AMD is 288.0 GB/s; Intel is system-dependent.
• Shading Units: AMD has 2048; Intel has 896.
• Texture Mapping Units: AMD has 128; Intel has 56.
• Render Output Units: AMD has 64; Intel has 24.
• Ray Tracing Cores: AMD has 32; Intel has no recorded value.
• Pixel Rate: AMD is 172.5 GPixel/s; Intel is 52.80 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: AMD is 345.0 GTexel/s; Intel is 123.2 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Performance: AMD is 22.08 TFLOPS; Intel is 3.942 TFLOPS.
• FP16 Performance: AMD is 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1); Intel is 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: AMD is 170 W; Intel is 65 W.
• Slot Width: AMD is dual-slot; Intel is IGP.
• Power Connectors: AMD uses 1x 8-pin; Intel has no recorded value.
• Suggested PSU: AMD is 450 W; Intel has no recorded value.
• Bus Interface: AMD is PCIe 4.0 x8; Intel is ring bus.
• Display Outputs: AMD is 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1; Intel is portable device dependent.
• DirectX Support: AMD is 12 Ultimate (12_2); Intel is 12 (12_1).
• Release Date: AMD is 2025-02-06; Intel is 2023-12-13.
• Predecessor: AMD is Navi II; Intel is HD Graphics-M.
• Successor: AMD is Navi IV; Intel has no recorded value.
• Launch MSRP: AMD is 279 USD; Intel has no recorded value.