AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has an average benchmark score of 12710 across all recorded tests in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT compare to its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 scores 12773, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7600M XT. The RX 7600M XT trails by a marginal 0.5% in this comparison.

Q: What memory configuration does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX use?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX consumes 105 W more power according to the recorded specifications.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, compared to 20.23 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is approximately 21.5% higher in raw FP32 throughput.

Q: What shading unit counts do the two cards have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 2048 shading units, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX carries three times the shading units of the AMD part.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture. Its codename is Hotpink Bonefish, and it is part of the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M). The chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process, with 13,300 million transistors packed into a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 7G106 chip built on an architecture labeled TrueGPU, from the 7G100 generation. It is also fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The database does not record a transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this chip. The manufacturer is listed as unknown, and no codename is provided.

Both cards use PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces. The AMD card is an integrated GPU package (IGP) with no power connectors and a slot width of IGP, indicating it is designed for portable devices. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a dual-slot card with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Its display outputs are four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, while the AMD card's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Memory architecture differs substantially. The RX 7600M XT uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both run their memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), but the wider bus on the LX MAX produces 50% more bandwidth.

Compute resource counts diverge sharply. The RX 7600M XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing core count is recorded for it. The LX MAX has exactly three times the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs of the AMD part.

The RX 7600M XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but its Vulkan support is 1.3, one minor version lower than the AMD card. Both cards list the same DirectX and OpenGL feature levels.

Clock behavior differs in documentation. The RX 7600M XT has recorded base, boost, and game clocks of 1280 MHz, 2469 MHz, and 2023 MHz respectively. The LX MAX has no base, boost, or game clocks recorded in the database. Only the memory clock is specified for both cards.

Pixel and texture rates reflect the architectural differences. The RX 7600M XT achieves 158.0 GPixel/s and 316.0 GTexel/s. The LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The LX MAX is about 21.5% higher in pixel rate and also about 21.5% higher in texture rate, consistent with its higher FP32 throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and neither card records any wins in direct comparisons. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no individual benchmark scores listed, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a full set of individual benchmark scores. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2048. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 74869, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 27793. Passmark results are as follows: DirectX 10 scores 76, DirectX 11 scores 137, DirectX 12 scores 58, DirectX 9 scores 175, G2D scores 894, G3D scores 13907, and GPU compute scores 7140.

Without benchmark scores for the LX MAX, direct performance comparison relies on specification-derived metrics. The LX MAX's FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7600M XT's 20.23 TFLOPS by about 21.5%. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s exceeds the AMD card's 288.0 GB/s by 50%. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s exceeds the AMD card's 316.0 GTexel/s by about 21.5%. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s exceeds the AMD card's 158.0 GPixel/s by about 21.5%.

The RX 7600M XT holds advantages in several areas where it has recorded data. It has a 52nd percentile ranking against all GPUs, while the LX MAX sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD card's average benchmark score of 12710 contrasts with the LX MAX's recorded average of 0, though this reflects missing data rather than actual performance.

The RX 7600M XT's nearest rivals in the database are all NVIDIA or AMD professional or older desktop parts. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 has an average score of 12773, which is 0.5% above the RX 7600M XT. The NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm scores 12625, which is 0.7% below the RX 7600M XT. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 scores 12830, which is 0.9% above the RX 7600M XT. The AMD Radeon Pro 455 scores 12831, also 0.9% above the RX 7600M XT. This places the RX 7600M XT in a tight performance band where its closest rivals are within about one percentage point in either direction.

The absence of LX MAX benchmark data means no delta percentages can be calculated against the RX 7600M XT. The database records no nearest rivals for the LX MAX, and its wins count is zero in both directions. Any direct comparison must therefore be framed through the specification data that is present.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on physical form factor and power envelope. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is an integrated GPU package with a 120 W TDP and no power connectors, designed for portable devices. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a dual-slot add-in card with a 225 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. These are different classes of hardware.

For systems requiring a low-power integrated solution, the RX 7600M XT is the only viable option between the two. Its 120 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it belongs in a mobile or compact platform. Its average benchmark score of 12710 and 52nd percentile ranking show it operates in a mid-range band relative to all GPUs, with its closest rivals within 0.9% of its score.

For systems that can accommodate a dual-slot card with external power, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX presents a specification profile that exceeds the RX 7600M XT in every measured compute and memory metric. Its FP32 throughput is 21.5% higher, its memory bandwidth is 50% higher, its texture rate is 21.5% higher, and its pixel rate is 21.5% higher. It also carries 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, and a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit.

However, the LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average score of 0 in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on incomplete data. The RX 7600M XT has a complete benchmark record and verified competitive positioning against four known rivals. Any verdict on the LX MAX rests entirely on its specification sheet.

The RX 7600M XT also holds an API advantage in Vulkan version support, listing Vulkan 1.4 compared to the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3. Both cards share DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 support. Ray tracing capability is recorded for the RX 7600M XT with 32 dedicated cores, while no ray tracing core count exists for the LX MAX.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and Lisuan Tech LX MAX differ in the following recorded fields:

• Series: Radeon RX 7000 series versus none recorded
• Manufacturer: AMD versus unknown
• Chip: Navi 33 versus 7G106
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 versus TrueGPU
• Codename: Hotpink Bonefish versus none recorded
• Generation: Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) versus 7G100
• Transistors: 13,300 million versus unknown
• Die size: 204 mm² versus unknown
• Transistor density: 65.2M per mm² versus none recorded
• Base clock: 1280 MHz versus none recorded
• Boost clock: 2469 MHz versus none recorded
• Game clock: 2023 MHz versus none recorded
• Memory size: 8 GB versus 12 GB
• Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 288.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 2048 versus 6144
• TMUs: 128 versus 192
• ROPs: 64 versus 96
• Ray tracing cores: 32 versus none recorded
• Pixel rate: 158.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 316.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 20.23 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: 40.45 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 120 W versus 225 W
• Slot width: IGP versus dual-slot
• Power connectors: none versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: none recorded versus 550 W
• Display outputs: portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan version: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Dimensions: none recorded versus 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width
• Release date: 2023-01-03 versus 2026-03-16
• Predecessor: Polaris Mobile versus none recorded

The two cards share the same process node (6 nm), foundry (TSMC), memory type (GDDR6), memory clock (2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective), bus interface (PCIe 4.0 x16), DirectX support (12 Ultimate, 12_2), OpenGL support (4.6), and production status (Active). Neither card has a launch MSRP recorded, and neither has a successor listed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT wins in integration and efficiency. Its 120 W TDP is 105 W lower than the LX MAX. It requires no power connectors, fits an IGP slot width, and is designed for portable device display outputs. Its release date of 2023-01-03 places it earlier in the product timeline. It has a complete benchmark record with an average score of 12710, a 52nd percentile ranking, and verified rival comparisons where its closest competitor sits only 0.9% away. Its Vulkan 1.4 support exceeds the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3. It has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the LX MAX records none.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in raw compute and memory capacity. Its 6144 shading units triple the AMD card's 2048. Its 12 GB memory exceeds the AMD card's 8 GB by 50%. Its 192-bit bus provides 50% more bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the AMD card's 20.23 TFLOPS by approximately 21.5%. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the AMD card's 40.45 TFLOPS by approximately 21.5%. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s both exceed the corresponding AMD figures by approximately 21.5%. Its 96 ROPs exceed the AMD card's 64 ROPs, and its 192 TMUs exceed the AMD card's 128 TMUs. It offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for desktop connectivity and has a later release date of 2026-03-16. Its dual-slot form factor with a 16-pin connector and 550 W suggested PSU indicates it is intended for a full desktop power delivery system.

The database records no direct benchmark wins for either card. The wins count is zero for both. The RX 7600M XT's strengths are proven through measured benchmark scores and competitor deltas. The LX MAX's strengths are entirely specification-based, since no benchmark scores exist for it. The performance picture for the LX MAX is therefore an extrapolation from its listed compute resources, memory subsystem, and clock-derived rates, not from tested results.