AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a full suite of benchmark results, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means the head-to-head analysis relies entirely on the AMD part’s measured performance and the architectural characteristics of both GPUs.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2048 points. In Geekbench, it records 74869 points for OpenCL and 27793 points for Vulkan. Passmark results show 13907 points in G3D, 7140 points in GPU Compute, 894 points in G2D, and legacy DirectX scores of 175 (DX9), 137 (DX11), 76 (DX10), and 58 (DX12). Its average benchmark score across all tests is 12710 points.

The AMD part sits at the 52nd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 at 12773 points (0.5% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 455 at 12831 points (0.9% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 at 12830 points (0.9% ahead), and the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm at 12625 points (0.7% behind). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the RX 7600M XT performs in a tightly clustered band around these older desktop and workstation parts.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0 and no entries in the benchmark array. Its percentile ranking is 50, which places it at the median, but this is based on no recorded performance data. Consequently, there are no direct score comparisons to report between the two GPUs. The wins counter shows zero for both sides, reflecting the absence of head-to-head benchmark entries.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is the only one of the two with measurable performance. It delivers a concrete set of scores across multiple APIs, with its average benchmark score of 12710 placing it at the 52nd percentile. The Intel Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no recorded benchmarks, so its real-world performance cannot be quantified from the database.

For users who require verified performance numbers, the AMD part is the clear choice based on available evidence. Its nearest competitors in the database, such as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and GTX 590, are all within 1% of its average score, which shows that the RX 7600M XT occupies a familiar performance tier. The Intel part’s 50th percentile ranking is nominal, since it lacks any supporting scores.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 does have advantages in power draw and manufacturing process, but without benchmark results, its actual graphics capability remains unverified. The AMD part’s 120 W TDP and 6 nm process node are documented, while the Intel part’s 25 W TDP and 3 nm node are also recorded, but these specifications do not substitute for measured performance.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT uses the Navi 33 chip based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M series) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip based on the Xe3-LPG architecture. It is part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation and is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel. Its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown, so no direct comparison is possible for those metrics.

The AMD part has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. These numbers indicate that the AMD GPU has a substantially larger execution resource pool.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature levels match. The AMD part uses PCIe 4.0 x16 for its bus interface, while the Intel part uses an integrated graphics processor (IGP) interface, which means it connects via the system bus rather than a discrete PCIe slot.

Specification Differences

The memory configuration differs fundamentally. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, with a type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." This means the Intel GPU has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the host system’s memory.

Clock speeds show a mixed picture. The AMD part has a base clock of 1280 MHz, a boost clock of 2469 MHz, and a game clock of 2023 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, but no game clock is listed. While the Intel boost clock is close to AMD’s, its base clock is significantly lower.

Pixel and texture rates reflect the resource disparity. The AMD GPU achieves 158.0 GPixel/s and 316.0 GTexel/s. The Intel GPU achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. These figures are consistent with the AMD part having more ROPs and TMUs.

Compute performance differs by a factor of over three. The AMD part delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Power consumption also contrasts sharply: the AMD TDP is 120 W, while the Intel TDP is 25 W.

Both GPUs are listed as IGP slot width with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The AMD part was released on 2023-01-03, while the Intel part has a release date of 2026-01-26. The AMD predecessor is Polaris Mobile, and the Intel predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. Neither has a successor listed, and neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: Its average benchmark score is 12710 points, placing it within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 (12773 points, 0.5% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831 points, 0.9% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830 points, 0.9% ahead), and the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm (12625 points, 0.7% behind).

Q: What benchmark scores does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B370. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile ranking of 50 is based on no recorded performance data.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 2048 shading units, compared to 1280 for the Intel Arc Pro B370. The AMD part also has 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs, versus 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs for the Intel part.

Q: How do the memory systems differ?

A: The AMD GPU has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel GPU uses system shared memory, with its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system.

Q: What is the power draw for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W. Both use an IGP slot width and have no power connectors.

Q: Which GPU delivers higher compute throughput?

A: The AMD part delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The AMD GPU also has higher pixel and texture rates: 158.0 GPixel/s and 316.0 GTexel/s, versus 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s for Intel.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Navi 33 chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Panther Lake chip is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the Intel chip’s transistor count and die size are unknown.