AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data separates these two GPUs into distinct use cases. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a discrete, actively sold add-in card with a full benchmark suite, a 60th percentile ranking among all GPUs, and an average benchmark score of 17083. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated processor graphics solution, consuming 25 W, built into a Panther Lake package, with no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals. The database shows zero head-to-head benchmark entries, zero wins for either side, and no direct comparison points.

For users who need a discrete graphics card with proven performance data, the RX 7600 XT is the only option with measurements. For users who need an integrated graphics solution on a Panther Lake processor, the Arc Pro B370 is the only option that fits that form factor. The data does not support a recommendation for one over the other in a shared use case, because they occupy different product categories. The RX 7600 XT delivers measured performance across ten benchmark tests. The Arc Pro B370 delivers none. The choice depends entirely on whether the system requires a standalone card or an integrated processor.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no benchmark entries in the database.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W and requires a 450 W suggested PSU with a single 8-pin power connector. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, requires no power connectors, and lists a suggested PSU as null.

Q: What process nodes do the two chips use?

A: The RX 7600 XT uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm Intel process, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ?

A: The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The RX 7600 XT is built on RDNA 3.0, a discrete GPU architecture from the Navi III (RX 7000) generation, using the Navi 33 chip with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. The Arc Pro B370 is built on Xe3-LPG, an Intel architecture for integrated graphics, part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation, and uses the Panther Lake chip.

The process nodes differ substantially. The RX 7600 XT is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process, with 13,300 million transistors and a die size of 204 mm², yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Arc Pro B370 is fabricated by Intel on a 3 nm process, with transistor count, die size, and density all listed as unknown.

The compute resources diverge sharply. The RX 7600 XT carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 carries 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RX 7600 XT has roughly 1.6 times the shading units, 3.2 times the TMUs, 3.2 times the ROPs, and 3.2 times the ray tracing cores.

Memory architecture differs completely. The RX 7600 XT uses dedicated GDDR6 memory: 16 GB on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses System Shared memory, meaning it draws from the host system's RAM, with bandwidth described as System Dependent. This reflects the integrated nature of the Arc Pro B370 versus the discrete design of the RX 7600 XT. The RX 7600 XT also has a dual-slot form factor, a 1x 8-pin power connector, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The Arc Pro B370 is an IGP, meaning it is integrated into the processor package with no slot width, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface.

Specification Differences

The clock behavior separates the two clearly. The RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a boost clock of 2755 MHz, and a game clock of 2470 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed. The memory clock differs as well: the RX 7600 XT runs at 2250 MHz, equivalent to 18 Gbps effective, while the Arc Pro B370 lists memory as System Shared.

The compute rates reflect the architectural gap. The RX 7600 XT achieves a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS. The Arc Pro B370 achieves 48.00 GPixel/s, 96.00 GTexel/s, and 6.144 TFLOPS FP32. The RX 7600 XT delivers roughly 3.7 times the pixel rate, 3.7 times the texture rate, and 3.7 times the FP32 throughput. The FP16 rates also differ: the RX 7600 XT lists FP16 at 22.57 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc Pro B370 lists 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating the Intel part can double its FP16 throughput relative to FP32.

The physical specifications diverge entirely. The RX 7600 XT measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded dimensions, as it is integrated. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W and no suggested PSU. The RX 7600 XT has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The Arc Pro B370 lists display outputs as Portable Device Dependent.

The release dates are separated by two years. The RX 7600 XT launched on 2024-01-23 with a launch MSRP of 329 USD. The Arc Pro B370 launched on 2026-01-26 with no launch MSRP recorded. The RX 7600 XT has a predecessor of Navi II and a successor of Navi IV. The Arc Pro B370 has a predecessor of HD Graphics-WM and no recorded successor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the RX 7600 XT and the Arc Pro B370. There are zero recorded wins for either GPU in direct comparisons. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both winsA and winsB are 0. This means no direct test data exists to compare the two in the same workload.

The RX 7600 XT has its own benchmark results, however. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2348. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 92426. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 48366. Passmark results include DirectX 10 at 85, DirectX 11 at 167, DirectX 12 at 65, DirectX 9 at 228, G2D at 1030, G3D at 17132, and GPU Compute at 8987. Its average benchmark score across these tests is 17083.

The Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 50, which reflects its placement relative to all recorded GPUs despite lacking any direct test scores. Its nearest rivals list is empty.

The RX 7600 XT's nearest rivals provide context for its measured performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 has an average score of 17037, a 0.3% delta. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M has an average score of 17019, a 0.4% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has an average score of 17208, a -0.7% delta. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 has an average score of 16932, a 0.9% delta. The RX 7600 XT sits within 1% of all four rivals, with its closest competitor being the RTX 3070, which leads by 0.7%, and the Tesla M4, which trails by 0.9%.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 XT wins in every category where measured data exists. It has a 60th percentile ranking among all GPUs, an average benchmark score of 17083, and ten individual benchmark results across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads. It delivers 22.57 TFLOPS FP32, 352.6 GTexel/s texture rate, and 176.3 GPixel/s pixel rate. It has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. It is a discrete, dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and three DisplayPort outputs plus one HDMI output.

The Arc Pro B370 wins in efficiency and integration. Its TDP of 25 W is dramatically lower than the RX 7600 XT's 190 W. It requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU. It is an IGP, meaning it takes no slot space, has no dimensions, and draws memory from the system. Its FP16 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio indicates it can process half-precision workloads at double its FP32 rate, a feature that may serve certain compute tasks. Its 3 nm Intel process node is newer than the 6 nm TSMC node of the RX 7600 XT.

For gaming and general discrete GPU workloads, the RX 7600 XT is the only option with benchmark data. For integrated systems where power draw and physical footprint are primary constraints, the Arc Pro B370 is the only option that fits. The data does not show any overlap in their intended roles. The RX 7600 XT has a predecessor and successor, indicating an active product line. The Arc Pro B370 has a predecessor but no successor, and its production status is Active. Both are listed as Active in production status.