AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy different positions in the database. The RX 7600 has a complete set of recorded benchmark scores, while the LX MAX currently has no benchmark entries, yielding an average benchmark score of 0. The RX 7600 sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15171. The LX MAX is listed at the 50th percentile, though this ranking is based on incomplete data.

The RX 7600's strongest recorded result comes from Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 88051. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it delivers 2310 points. PassMark G3D shows 16634, while PassMark GPU Compute records 8790. The card also produces PassMark scores of 984 in G2D, 226 in DirectX 9, 172 in DirectX 11, 84 in DirectX 10, and 58 in DirectX 12. Geekbench Vulkan adds 34401 points.

Direct rival comparisons for the RX 7600 place it within a narrow band. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 15199, which is 0.2% higher than the RX 7600's average. The AMD Radeon 680M averages 15270, 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X averages 15082, 0.6% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti averages 15063, 0.7% lower. These deltas are small, indicating the RX 7600 trades blows with these cards within a fraction of a percent.

The LX MAX has no head-to-head benchmark entries and no nearest rivals listed. Its average benchmark score of 0 reflects the absence of recorded data. The database shows the LX MAX with a 50th percentile placement, but without measured results, direct score comparisons between the two cards are not possible. The data instead allows for architectural and specification analysis, where the two cards diverge substantially.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 wins in any scenario requiring recorded benchmark validation. Its suite of PassMark tests, Geekbench workloads, and 3DMark Steel Nomad provides measurable performance across DirectX 9 through 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, compute, and 2D operations. The card's 57th percentile placement among all GPUs indicates it outperforms more than half of the database population.

The LX MAX wins in memory capacity and memory bandwidth. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s. The LX MAX also offers more shading units, texture mapping units, and render output units. With 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, it exceeds the RX 7600's 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs.

The LX MAX also posts higher theoretical throughput figures. Its FP32 rating is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 21.75 TFLOPS for the RX 7600. In FP16, the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS at 1:1. Pixel rate favors the LX MAX at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 169.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate favors it at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s.

The LX MAX supports a wider PCIe interface. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The LX MAX also has a higher TDP at 225 W, suggesting a more power-hungry design that may sustain higher sustained loads, though the database does not list efficiency metrics.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation within the Radeon RX 7000 series, manufactured by AMD on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Its predecessor is Navi II, and its successor is Navi IV. The RX 7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores. Its FP16 throughput matches FP32 at 21.75 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio.

The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip based on TrueGPU architecture, from the 7G100 generation. The manufacturer is listed as Unknown. Process node is also 6 nm at TSMC, but transistor count, die size, and transistor density are not recorded. The LX MAX has no listed ray tracing cores. Its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS, which is exactly double its FP32 rate, indicating a 2:1 ratio. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3, whereas the RX 7600 supports Vulkan 1.4.

The RX 7600's RDNA 3.0 architecture is a known quantity in the database with a full benchmark history. The LX MAX's TrueGPU architecture has no recorded benchmarks, so its real-world behavior cannot be validated from the data. The architectural differences in FP16 ratio and ray tracing support suggest different design priorities, but without measured results, the impact remains speculative.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. Memory size: 8 GB for the RX 7600, 12 GB for the LX MAX. Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 192 bit. Memory bandwidth: 288.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Both use GDDR6 memory with the same effective clock of 2250 MHz 18 Gbps.

Shading units: 2048 versus 6144. TMUs: 128 versus 192. ROPs: 64 versus 96. The RX 7600 has 32 ray tracing cores; the LX MAX has none listed. Pixel rate: 169.9 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 339.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 21.75 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: 165 W for the RX 7600, 225 W for the LX MAX. Power connector: 1x 8-pin for the RX 7600, 1x 16-pin for the LX MAX. Suggested PSU: 450 W versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: the RX 7600 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1; the LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Dimensions differ as well. The RX 7600 measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Both are dual-slot cards.

Clock speeds are partially recorded. The RX 7600 has base, boost, and game clocks of 1720 MHz, 2655 MHz, and 2250 MHz respectively. The LX MAX has no base, boost, or game clocks recorded. Only the memory clock is listed, matching the RX 7600 at 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective.

The RX 7600 has a launch MSRP of 269 USD. The LX MAX has no launch MSRP recorded. Release dates also differ: the RX 7600 was released on 2023-05-24, while the LX MAX has a release date of 2026-03-16. Both cards are listed as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The LX MAX provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth on a 192-bit bus. The RX 7600 provides 288.0 GB/s on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference?

A: The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is higher than the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS.

Q: Which card has ray tracing support?

A: The RX 7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has no ray tracing cores listed in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W and requires a 450 W PSU with a 1x 8-pin connector. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W PSU with a 1x 16-pin connector.

Q: Do both cards support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which card has recorded benchmark scores?

A: Only the RX 7600 has benchmark entries. Its average benchmark score is 15171, placing it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The LX MAX has no recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0.