AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Intel Arc Pro B370

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 and Intel Arc Pro B370 occupy very different positions in the hardware landscape. The RX 7600 is a discrete, actively cooled desktop graphics card with a full benchmark record, while the Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the Arc Pro B370 brings its own advantages in efficiency and form factor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The RX 7600 has a complete set of ten recorded benchmark scores, while the Arc Pro B370 has zero recorded benchmarks and an average benchmark score of 0. This absence of data means any quantitative comparison must rely on the RX 7600’s recorded measurements and the architectural differences between the two parts.

The RX 7600’s average benchmark score stands at 15,171. This places it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with an average score of 15,199, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the RX 7600 trails that card by a negligible margin. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15,270, putting the RX 7600 0.7% behind it. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15,082, with the RX 7600 ahead by 0.6%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15,063, with the RX 7600 ahead by 0.7%. These tight deltas indicate the RX 7600 sits in a very competitive mid-range cluster.

Looking at specific workloads, the RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 21.75 TFLOPS of FP16 compute at a 1:1 ratio. Its pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 7600 scores 2,310 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 88,051 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 34,401 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results show 16,634 in G3D, 8,790 in GPU Compute, 984 in G2D, 226 in DirectX 9, 172 in DirectX 11, 84 in DirectX 10, and 58 in DirectX 12.

The Arc Pro B370, by contrast, has no recorded scores for any of these tests. Its FP32 compute is 6.144 TFLOPS, its FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. These figures place the Arc Pro B370 at roughly 28% of the RX 7600’s FP32 throughput, 56% of its pixel fill rate, and 28% of its texture fill rate. With no benchmark scores to confirm real-world performance, the database can only show that the RX 7600’s theoretical compute advantage is substantial.

The percentile data reinforces this gap. The RX 7600 sits at the 57th percentile, while the Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile. A 50th percentile ranking with zero benchmark scores suggests the database assigns it a median position by default, not from measured performance. The RX 7600’s 57th percentile is backed by actual measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different architectures and process technologies. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation and is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, and no transistor density figure is recorded. The 3 nm process is a smaller node than the RX 7600’s 6 nm process, which typically allows for higher density and lower power consumption, though the database does not provide density numbers to confirm this for the Intel part.

The RX 7600 has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster output pipelines, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. In every one of these counts, the RX 7600 has more hardware resources. The RX 7600’s shading units are 1.6 times more numerous, its TMUs are 3.2 times more numerous, its ROPs are 3.2 times more numerous, and its ray tracing cores are 3.2 times more numerous.

Memory configurations differ drastically. The RX 7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective data rate. This yields a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. Its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system dependent. The RX 7600’s dedicated 288.0 GB/s bandwidth contrasts with the Arc Pro B370’s reliance on shared system memory, which typically provides lower and more variable bandwidth.

Clock speeds also differ. The RX 7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2655 MHz, and a game clock of 2250 MHz. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed. The RX 7600’s base clock is over 5.7 times higher, and its boost clock is 10.6% higher.

Power and physical characteristics diverge sharply. The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W. It is a dual-slot card measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU requirement. It is an IGP, meaning it is integrated into a processor package and has no physical dimensions listed. The Arc Pro B370’s power draw is 15% of the RX 7600’s, a significant efficiency advantage.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the RX 7600 has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Arc Pro B370’s outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its integrated nature. The RX 7600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Arc Pro B370 uses an IGP interface with no separate bus.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The RX 7600 is 3.5 times higher in FP32 throughput.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory for all memory functions. Its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system dependent. The RX 7600 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W, requires a 1x 8-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Are both GPUs compatible with the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The RX 7600’s average score is 15,171. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM by 0.2% (that card scores 15,199) and the AMD Radeon 680M by 0.7% (that card scores 15,270). It leads the AMD Radeon Pro 560X by 0.6% (15,082) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 0.7% (15,063).

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RX 7600 has 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores, which is 3.2 times fewer.

The Verdict

The data shows two products aimed at entirely different use cases. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a discrete desktop graphics card with measured performance in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 15,171 places it in tight competition with cards like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, AMD Radeon Pro 560X, AMD Radeon 680M, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti, all within 0.7% of each other. The RX 7600’s dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute make it suitable for gaming and content creation workloads where discrete memory and high throughput matter.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 50th percentile ranking but no measured benchmarks. Its 25 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and system shared memory indicate a design for low-power, portable devices where battery life and thermals take priority over raw performance. Its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are substantially lower than the RX 7600’s figures, but its 3 nm process node and integrated form factor serve a different purpose.

For users who need measured performance, the RX 7600 is the clear choice. The database contains its full benchmark suite, including a 2,310 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and an 88,051 score in Geekbench OpenCL. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmarks, so its real-world performance cannot be verified from the data. The RX 7600’s 57th percentile ranking, backed by ten separate test scores, indicates a card that performs competitively within its mid-range class.

For users prioritizing efficiency and integration, the Arc Pro B370 offers advantages that the RX 7600 cannot match. Its 25 W TDP is 15% of the RX 7600’s 165 W, it needs no power connectors, and its IGP form factor eliminates the need for a separate card slot. The 3 nm process node suggests a more modern manufacturing approach, though the database does not provide transistor density figures to confirm this. Its system shared memory model means flexibility in memory allocation, though it sacrifices the dedicated bandwidth of the RX 7600’s 288.0 GB/s GDDR6 solution.

The architecture differences are stark. The RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0 with 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 uses Xe3-LPG with 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. Every hardware resource count favors the RX 7600 by factors of 1.6 to 3.2. Clock speeds also favor the RX 7600, with a base clock of 1720 MHz versus 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz versus 2400 MHz.

The release dates differ by over two and a half years. The RX 7600 launched on 2023-05-24, while the Arc Pro B370 launched on 2026-01-26. The RX 7600 has a recorded launch MSRP of 269 USD, while the Arc Pro B370 has no launch MSRP listed. The RX 7600 has a successor in Navi IV and a predecessor in Navi II, while the Arc Pro B370 has a predecessor in HD Graphics-WM and no successor listed.

The recorded data indicates that the RX 7600 is a fully realized discrete graphics product with competitive mid-range performance. The Arc Pro B370 is a newer, more efficient integrated solution whose performance remains unmeasured in the database. Users seeking confirmed performance should look to the RX 7600; users seeking minimal power draw and integrated simplicity should consider the Arc Pro B370. No benchmark data exists to suggest the Arc Pro B370 can challenge the RX 7600 in raw throughput, and the theoretical compute figures confirm a substantial gap.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | Intel Arc Pro B370 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe3-LPG |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 1720 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2250 MHz | null |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 128 | 40 |

| ROPs | 64 | 20 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 10 |

| FP32 Compute | 21.75 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 165 W | 25 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | null |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2023-05-24 | 2026-01-26 |

| Launch MSRP | 269 USD | null |

| Predecessor | Navi II | HD Graphics-WM |

| Successor | Navi IV | null |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 57 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 15171 | 0 |